Heart transplant donation after circulatory death: current status and implications.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Current Opinion in Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-18 DOI:10.1097/HCO.0000000000001109
Savitri Fedson
{"title":"Heart transplant donation after circulatory death: current status and implications.","authors":"Savitri Fedson","doi":"10.1097/HCO.0000000000001109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The use of cardiac transplantation following circulatory death (DCD) has been limited worldwide. Concerns about cardiac function after warm ischemia and the potential for decreased graft function have been important considerations in this hesitancy. In addition, ethical and legal questions about the two widely used organ procurement methods have led to discussions and public education in many countries.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Publication of a US randomized trial of cardiac transplantation following DCD has shown that it is both feasible and has similar short-term outcomes compared with cardiac transplantation following brain death (DBD). These data support those from both Australia and the UK who have largest experience to date.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The adoption of cardiac transplantation following circulatory death has increased overall cardiac transplantation in those transplant centers who have incorporated these donors. Short term outcomes for DCD organ procurement methods are similar to those outcomes using DBD hearts. Continued study and standardization of warm ischemic times will allow for better comparisons of organ procurement techniques and organ optimization. The ethical concerns about procurement methods, in addition to a discussion of procurement costs and feasibility will need to be addressed further in the efforts to expand the organ pool and increase overall cardiac transplantation numbers.</p>","PeriodicalId":55197,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HCO.0000000000001109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: The use of cardiac transplantation following circulatory death (DCD) has been limited worldwide. Concerns about cardiac function after warm ischemia and the potential for decreased graft function have been important considerations in this hesitancy. In addition, ethical and legal questions about the two widely used organ procurement methods have led to discussions and public education in many countries.

Recent findings: Publication of a US randomized trial of cardiac transplantation following DCD has shown that it is both feasible and has similar short-term outcomes compared with cardiac transplantation following brain death (DBD). These data support those from both Australia and the UK who have largest experience to date.

Summary: The adoption of cardiac transplantation following circulatory death has increased overall cardiac transplantation in those transplant centers who have incorporated these donors. Short term outcomes for DCD organ procurement methods are similar to those outcomes using DBD hearts. Continued study and standardization of warm ischemic times will allow for better comparisons of organ procurement techniques and organ optimization. The ethical concerns about procurement methods, in addition to a discussion of procurement costs and feasibility will need to be addressed further in the efforts to expand the organ pool and increase overall cardiac transplantation numbers.

循环死亡后的心脏移植捐赠:现状与影响。
审查目的:在全球范围内,循环死亡(DCD)后心脏移植的使用一直受到限制。人们对热缺血后心脏功能的担忧以及移植物功能下降的可能性是造成这种犹豫不决的重要原因。此外,有关两种广泛使用的器官获取方法的伦理和法律问题也引发了许多国家的讨论和公众教育:美国公布的一项关于 DCD 后心脏移植的随机试验表明,与脑死亡(DBD)后心脏移植相比,DCD 后心脏移植是可行的,并且具有相似的短期效果。这些数据支持了澳大利亚和英国迄今为止最丰富的经验。摘要:循环死亡后心脏移植的采用增加了那些纳入这些供体的移植中心的整体心脏移植量。DCD器官获取方法的短期结果与使用DBD心脏的结果相似。对温暖缺血时间的持续研究和标准化将有助于更好地比较器官获取技术和器官优化。在努力扩大器官库和增加整体心脏移植数量的过程中,除了讨论器官获取成本和可行性外,还需要进一步解决有关器官获取方法的伦理问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Cardiology
Current Opinion in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​Current Opinion in Cardiology is a bimonthly publication offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field. Each issue features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With fourteen disciplines published across the year – including arrhythmias, molecular genetics, HDL cholesterol and clinical trials – every issue also contains annotated reference detailing the merits of the most important papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信