Patient and Clinician Stakeholder Perspectives on a Patient Portal Questionnaire Eliciting Illness and Treatment Understanding and Core Health-Related Values.

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative medicine reports Pub Date : 2023-11-30 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1089/pmr.2023.0057
William E Rosa, Jaime Gilliland, Meghan McDarby, Judith E Nelson, Anjali V Desai, Andrew S Epstein
{"title":"Patient and Clinician Stakeholder Perspectives on a Patient Portal Questionnaire Eliciting Illness and Treatment Understanding and Core Health-Related Values.","authors":"William E Rosa, Jaime Gilliland, Meghan McDarby, Judith E Nelson, Anjali V Desai, Andrew S Epstein","doi":"10.1089/pmr.2023.0057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Person-centered communication is foundational to cancer care. In pilot research, a questionnaire eliciting patients' illness and treatment understanding (ITU) and core health-related values (HRV) through the electronic patient portal demonstrated feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy. The aim of this study was to elicit stakeholder feedback to refine the design of the portal-based intervention, remain end-user centered, and optimize future system-wide integration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between April and June 2023, we purposively sampled patients and clinicians from a previous pilot study to participate in a 20-30-minute semistructured interview about their opinions of and experiences with the portal questionnaire on ITU and HRV. An interdisciplinary coding team used a two-phase rapid analysis to identify themes, subthemes, and illustrative participant quotations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen patients (mean age = 68 years) and 12 clinicians participated (total <i>n</i> = 26). Colorectal cancer was the commonest malignancy (64%) among patients. Clinicians were mostly physicians (50%), nurse practitioners (33%), and registered nurses (17%), with two-thirds having >15 years of experience in their specialty. Analysis generated four themes: (1) clinical utility of questionnaire, (2) barriers to questionnaire implementation, (3) considerations and strategies for modifying the questionnaire, and (4) considerations and strategies for questionnaire implementation. Themes captured key information about incorporating this questionnaire into clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with cancer and their clinicians found a portal-based ITU and HRV questionnaire clinically useful to improve multiple aspects of person-centered communication. Participant recommendations about questionnaire timing and sharing of questionnaire responses with the clinical team will inform future questionnaire implementation and scaling in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":74394,"journal":{"name":"Palliative medicine reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10712361/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative medicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pmr.2023.0057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Person-centered communication is foundational to cancer care. In pilot research, a questionnaire eliciting patients' illness and treatment understanding (ITU) and core health-related values (HRV) through the electronic patient portal demonstrated feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy. The aim of this study was to elicit stakeholder feedback to refine the design of the portal-based intervention, remain end-user centered, and optimize future system-wide integration.

Methods: Between April and June 2023, we purposively sampled patients and clinicians from a previous pilot study to participate in a 20-30-minute semistructured interview about their opinions of and experiences with the portal questionnaire on ITU and HRV. An interdisciplinary coding team used a two-phase rapid analysis to identify themes, subthemes, and illustrative participant quotations.

Results: Fourteen patients (mean age = 68 years) and 12 clinicians participated (total n = 26). Colorectal cancer was the commonest malignancy (64%) among patients. Clinicians were mostly physicians (50%), nurse practitioners (33%), and registered nurses (17%), with two-thirds having >15 years of experience in their specialty. Analysis generated four themes: (1) clinical utility of questionnaire, (2) barriers to questionnaire implementation, (3) considerations and strategies for modifying the questionnaire, and (4) considerations and strategies for questionnaire implementation. Themes captured key information about incorporating this questionnaire into clinical practice.

Conclusion: Patients with cancer and their clinicians found a portal-based ITU and HRV questionnaire clinically useful to improve multiple aspects of person-centered communication. Participant recommendations about questionnaire timing and sharing of questionnaire responses with the clinical team will inform future questionnaire implementation and scaling in clinical settings.

患者和临床医生利益相关者对患者门户网站问卷调查的看法,该问卷调查旨在了解患者对疾病和治疗的理解以及与健康相关的核心价值观。
简介以人为本的沟通是癌症护理的基础。在试点研究中,通过电子患者门户网站收集患者对疾病和治疗的理解(ITU)以及与健康相关的核心价值观(HRV)的问卷调查显示了其可行性、可接受性和有效性。本研究旨在征求利益相关者的反馈意见,以完善基于门户网站的干预设计,始终以最终用户为中心,并优化未来的全系统整合:方法:2023 年 4 月至 6 月期间,我们有目的地从之前的试点研究中抽取了患者和临床医生,让他们参加 20-30 分钟的半结构式访谈,了解他们对 ITU 和心率变异门户问卷的看法和使用体验。跨学科编码小组采用两阶段快速分析法确定主题、次主题和参与者的说明性引文:共有 14 名患者(平均年龄为 68 岁)和 12 名临床医生参与(总人数为 26 人)。结肠直肠癌是患者中最常见的恶性肿瘤(64%)。临床医生大多是内科医生(50%)、执业护士(33%)和注册护士(17%),其中三分之二在其专业领域有超过 15 年的工作经验。分析产生了四个主题:(1) 问卷的临床实用性;(2) 实施问卷的障碍;(3) 修改问卷的注意事项和策略;(4) 实施问卷的注意事项和策略。这些主题捕捉到了将该问卷纳入临床实践的关键信息:结论:癌症患者及其临床医生发现,基于门户网站的 ITU 和心率变异调查问卷在临床上非常有用,可以改善以人为本的沟通的多个方面。参与者就问卷时间安排和与临床团队分享问卷答复提出的建议将为未来问卷在临床环境中的实施和推广提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信