Adherence to Modern Contraceptives Among Female Refugee Adolescents in Northern Uganda: A Prospective Single Cohort Study.

IF 1.8 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Open access journal of contraception Pub Date : 2023-12-02 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OAJC.S430813
Ritah Bakesiima, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson, Jolly Beyeza-Kashesya, Amanda Cleeve, Elin C Larsson, Rose Chalo Nabirye
{"title":"Adherence to Modern Contraceptives Among Female Refugee Adolescents in Northern Uganda: A Prospective Single Cohort Study.","authors":"Ritah Bakesiima, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson, Jolly Beyeza-Kashesya, Amanda Cleeve, Elin C Larsson, Rose Chalo Nabirye","doi":"10.2147/OAJC.S430813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Contraceptive adherence is the current and consistent use of a contraceptive method as prescribed by a health worker or family planning provider so as to prevent pregnancy. Globally, adherence is lowest among adolescents. This has greatly contributed to the high burden of adolescent pregnancies. Adherence and reasons for discontinuation among refugee adolescents are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to determine the rates and predictors of adherence to modern contraceptives among female refugee adolescents in northern Uganda.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective single cohort study, nested into a randomised controlled trial (RCT) assessing the effect of peer counselling on acceptance of modern contraceptives. The RCT was conducted among female refugee adolescents in Palabek refugee settlement, northern Uganda. The study involved 272 new starters of modern contraceptives who were followed up for six months from May 2019 to January 2020. The outcome was measured at one, three, and six months after receiving a contraceptive method, and the predictors of adherence were determined using Generalised Estimating Equations (GEE). Data were analysed using STATA version 14.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adherence rates were low and reduced over time. By the end of the six months, only 44% of the participants were using a contraceptive method. Participants using long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC) were more likely to adhere compared to those who were using short-acting reversible contraceptives (SARC) (OR: 3.37, 95% CI: 1.914-5.937, <i>p</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adherence to modern contraceptives was low, leaving adolescents at risk of unintended pregnancies. Participants using LARC were more likely to adhere than those using SARC. Interventions addressing fear of side effects and partner prohibition should be studied and implemented to enable adherence to modern contraceptives.</p>","PeriodicalId":74348,"journal":{"name":"Open access journal of contraception","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10700036/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open access journal of contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJC.S430813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Contraceptive adherence is the current and consistent use of a contraceptive method as prescribed by a health worker or family planning provider so as to prevent pregnancy. Globally, adherence is lowest among adolescents. This has greatly contributed to the high burden of adolescent pregnancies. Adherence and reasons for discontinuation among refugee adolescents are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to determine the rates and predictors of adherence to modern contraceptives among female refugee adolescents in northern Uganda.

Methods: This was a prospective single cohort study, nested into a randomised controlled trial (RCT) assessing the effect of peer counselling on acceptance of modern contraceptives. The RCT was conducted among female refugee adolescents in Palabek refugee settlement, northern Uganda. The study involved 272 new starters of modern contraceptives who were followed up for six months from May 2019 to January 2020. The outcome was measured at one, three, and six months after receiving a contraceptive method, and the predictors of adherence were determined using Generalised Estimating Equations (GEE). Data were analysed using STATA version 14.0.

Results: Adherence rates were low and reduced over time. By the end of the six months, only 44% of the participants were using a contraceptive method. Participants using long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC) were more likely to adhere compared to those who were using short-acting reversible contraceptives (SARC) (OR: 3.37, 95% CI: 1.914-5.937, p<0.001).

Conclusion: Adherence to modern contraceptives was low, leaving adolescents at risk of unintended pregnancies. Participants using LARC were more likely to adhere than those using SARC. Interventions addressing fear of side effects and partner prohibition should be studied and implemented to enable adherence to modern contraceptives.

乌干达北部女性难民青少年坚持使用现代避孕药具的情况:一项前瞻性单一队列研究。
背景:坚持使用避孕药具是指当前坚持使用卫生工作者或计划生育服务提供者规定的避孕方法,以防止怀孕。在全球范围内,青少年的避孕率最低。这在很大程度上造成了青少年怀孕的高负担。人们对难民青少年坚持使用避孕药具和中止使用的原因知之甚少。本研究旨在确定乌干达北部女性难民青少年坚持使用现代避孕药具的比例和预测因素:这是一项前瞻性单一队列研究,嵌套于一项随机对照试验(RCT)中,评估同伴咨询对接受现代避孕药具的影响。随机对照试验在乌干达北部帕拉贝克难民定居点的女性难民青少年中进行。研究涉及 272 名新开始使用现代避孕药具的青少年,从 2019 年 5 月至 2020 年 1 月对她们进行了为期 6 个月的随访。研究结果在接受避孕方法后的1个月、3个月和6个月进行测量,并使用广义估计方程(GEE)确定坚持避孕的预测因素。数据使用 STATA 14.0 版进行分析:坚持率较低,并随着时间的推移而降低。六个月结束时,只有 44% 的参与者使用了避孕方法。与使用短效可逆避孕药(SARC)的参与者相比,使用长效可逆避孕药(LARC)的参与者更有可能坚持使用(OR:3.37,95% CI:1.914-5.937,p):现代避孕药具的依从性很低,使青少年面临意外怀孕的风险。使用 LARC 的参与者比使用 SARC 的参与者更有可能坚持使用。应研究并实施干预措施,消除对副作用的恐惧和禁止伴侣使用,以促进坚持使用现代避孕药具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信