Plantar Thermography in High-Risk Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Compared to Nondiabetic Individuals.

Gabriela Verónica Carro, María Laura Noli, María Gabriela Rodriguez, Miguel Ticona, Mariana Fuentes, María de Los Ángeles Llanos, Federico Caporaso, Guillermo Marciales, Sebastián Leandro Emanuel Turco
{"title":"Plantar Thermography in High-Risk Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Compared to Nondiabetic Individuals.","authors":"Gabriela Verónica Carro, María Laura Noli, María Gabriela Rodriguez, Miguel Ticona, Mariana Fuentes, María de Los Ángeles Llanos, Federico Caporaso, Guillermo Marciales, Sebastián Leandro Emanuel Turco","doi":"10.1177/15347346231218034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diabetic foot (DF) is one of the most devastating complications of diabetes mellitus (DM). Infrared thermography has been studied for its potential in early diagnosis and preventive measures against DF ulcers, although its role in the management and prevention of DF complications remains uncertain. The objective of this study was to determine the average temperatures of different points of the plantar foot using infrared thermography in patients with DM and history of DF (DFa group, at the highest risk of developing foot ulcers) and compare them to people without DM (NoDM group). One hundred and twenty-three feet were included, 63 of them belonged to DFa Group and the other 60 to NoDM Group. The average temperature in the NoDM Group was 27.4 (26.3-28.5) versus 28.6 (26.8-30.3) in the DFa Group (<i>p</i> = .002). There were differences between both groups in temperatures at the metatarsal heads and heels, but not in the arch. Average foot temperatures did not relate to sex, ankle-brachial index, and age, and had a mild correlation with daily temperature (Spearman 0.51, <i>p</i> < .001). Data provided in our study could be useful in establishing a parameter of normal temperatures for high-risk patients. This could serve as a foundational framework for future research and provide reference values, not only for preventative purposes, as commonly addressed in most studies, but also to assess the applicability of thermography in clinical scenarios particularly when one foot cannot serve as a reference, suspected osteomyelitis of the remaining bone, or instances of increased temperature in specific areas which may necessitate adjustments to the insoles in secondary prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346231218034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diabetic foot (DF) is one of the most devastating complications of diabetes mellitus (DM). Infrared thermography has been studied for its potential in early diagnosis and preventive measures against DF ulcers, although its role in the management and prevention of DF complications remains uncertain. The objective of this study was to determine the average temperatures of different points of the plantar foot using infrared thermography in patients with DM and history of DF (DFa group, at the highest risk of developing foot ulcers) and compare them to people without DM (NoDM group). One hundred and twenty-three feet were included, 63 of them belonged to DFa Group and the other 60 to NoDM Group. The average temperature in the NoDM Group was 27.4 (26.3-28.5) versus 28.6 (26.8-30.3) in the DFa Group (p = .002). There were differences between both groups in temperatures at the metatarsal heads and heels, but not in the arch. Average foot temperatures did not relate to sex, ankle-brachial index, and age, and had a mild correlation with daily temperature (Spearman 0.51, p < .001). Data provided in our study could be useful in establishing a parameter of normal temperatures for high-risk patients. This could serve as a foundational framework for future research and provide reference values, not only for preventative purposes, as commonly addressed in most studies, but also to assess the applicability of thermography in clinical scenarios particularly when one foot cannot serve as a reference, suspected osteomyelitis of the remaining bone, or instances of increased temperature in specific areas which may necessitate adjustments to the insoles in secondary prevention.

与非糖尿病患者相比,糖尿病高危患者的足底热成像。
糖尿病足(DF)是糖尿病(DM)最具破坏性的并发症之一。红外热成像技术在早期诊断和预防糖尿病足溃疡方面的潜力已得到研究,但其在管理和预防糖尿病足并发症方面的作用仍不确定。本研究的目的是利用红外热成像技术确定有糖尿病和 DF 病史的患者(DFa 组,罹患足部溃疡的风险最高)足底不同部位的平均温度,并将其与无糖尿病患者(无 DFa 组)进行比较。共纳入了 123 只脚,其中 63 只属于 DFa 组,另外 60 只属于 NoDM 组。NoDM 组的平均温度为 27.4(26.3-28.5),而 DFa 组为 28.6(26.8-30.3)(p = .002)。两组的跖骨头和脚跟温度存在差异,但足弓温度没有差异。足部平均温度与性别、踝肱指数和年龄无关,与日温度有轻度相关性(Spearman 0.51,p = 0.002)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信