Patients with Chronic Pain: Are Mindfulness Traits Protective Against Distress, Anxiety and Depression?

IF 2 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Mario Miniati, Graziella Orrù, Mery Paroli, Maristella Cinque, Adriana Paolicchi, Angelo Gemignani, Giulio Perugi, Rebecca Ciacchini, Donatella Marazziti, Laura Palagini, Ciro Conversano
{"title":"Patients with Chronic Pain: Are Mindfulness Traits Protective Against Distress, Anxiety and Depression?","authors":"Mario Miniati, Graziella Orrù, Mery Paroli, Maristella Cinque, Adriana Paolicchi, Angelo Gemignani, Giulio Perugi, Rebecca Ciacchini, Donatella Marazziti, Laura Palagini, Ciro Conversano","doi":"10.36131/cnfioritieditore20230505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate mindfulness traits/attitudes as protective factors against chronic pain related distress, depression and anxiety.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Fifty patients (25 with chronic non-oncologic pain-NOP; 25 with chronic oncologic pain-COP) were administered with the following scales: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Pain Disability Index (PDI), Italian Questionnaire for Pain (QUID), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), State and Trait Anxiety Scale (STAY-y1 module), Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Psychological General Well Being Index (PGWBI), Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MAAS value ≥ 4.38 was adopted as cut-off to compare '<i>high level of mindfulness</i>' (HM) vs. '<i>normal level of mindfulness</i>' (NM) attitudes. Twenty-six patients (52%) scored ≥4.38, with no different distribution between NOP and COP. HM patients scored significantly lower than NM patients on PDI <i>'family/home responsibilities'</i> domain (4.5±3.2 vs. 6.4±2.8; p<.037), and on PSS (17.8±2.6 vs. 20.9±2.5; p<.0001), STAY-y1 (9.4±1.8 vs. 10.3±2.1; p<.0001), BDI-II (7.8±5.0 vs. 17.6±8.6; p<.0001) total scores. HM scored significantly higher than NM patients in all PGWBI domains. A multiple regression analysis was carried out to analyze the predictor variables of PGWB. The most complete model considered the variables MAAS, STAIy and VAS (F=42.21; p<.0001), that accounted for the 71.6% of PGWB variance. MAAS score was the only variable positively predicting for PGWB; STAIy and VAS scores predicted negatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Chronic pain patients with high levels of mindfulness attitudes experienced less distress, anxiety, depressive symptoms, and more physical and general wellbeing than patients with low levels of mindfulness attitudes.</p>","PeriodicalId":46700,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10712298/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36131/cnfioritieditore20230505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate mindfulness traits/attitudes as protective factors against chronic pain related distress, depression and anxiety.

Method: Fifty patients (25 with chronic non-oncologic pain-NOP; 25 with chronic oncologic pain-COP) were administered with the following scales: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Pain Disability Index (PDI), Italian Questionnaire for Pain (QUID), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), State and Trait Anxiety Scale (STAY-y1 module), Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Psychological General Well Being Index (PGWBI), Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS).

Results: MAAS value ≥ 4.38 was adopted as cut-off to compare 'high level of mindfulness' (HM) vs. 'normal level of mindfulness' (NM) attitudes. Twenty-six patients (52%) scored ≥4.38, with no different distribution between NOP and COP. HM patients scored significantly lower than NM patients on PDI 'family/home responsibilities' domain (4.5±3.2 vs. 6.4±2.8; p<.037), and on PSS (17.8±2.6 vs. 20.9±2.5; p<.0001), STAY-y1 (9.4±1.8 vs. 10.3±2.1; p<.0001), BDI-II (7.8±5.0 vs. 17.6±8.6; p<.0001) total scores. HM scored significantly higher than NM patients in all PGWBI domains. A multiple regression analysis was carried out to analyze the predictor variables of PGWB. The most complete model considered the variables MAAS, STAIy and VAS (F=42.21; p<.0001), that accounted for the 71.6% of PGWB variance. MAAS score was the only variable positively predicting for PGWB; STAIy and VAS scores predicted negatively.

Conclusions: Chronic pain patients with high levels of mindfulness attitudes experienced less distress, anxiety, depressive symptoms, and more physical and general wellbeing than patients with low levels of mindfulness attitudes.

慢性疼痛患者:正念特质是否能抵御压力、焦虑和抑郁?
目的: 研究正念特质/态度作为慢性疼痛相关痛苦、抑郁和焦虑的保护因素:研究正念特质/态度作为慢性疼痛相关痛苦、抑郁和焦虑的保护因素:对 50 名患者(25 名慢性非肿瘤性疼痛患者-NOP;25 名慢性肿瘤性疼痛患者-COP)进行以下量表测试:视觉模拟量表(VAS)、疼痛残疾指数(PDI)、意大利疼痛问卷(QUID)、感知压力量表(PSS)、状态和特质焦虑量表(STAY-y1 模块)、贝克抑郁量表 II(BDI-II)、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)、心理总体健康指数(PGWBI)、正念注意力认知量表(MAAS):以 MAAS 值≥ 4.38 为临界值,比较 "高水平正念"(HM)与 "正常水平正念"(NM)的态度。26名患者(52%)的得分≥4.38,NOP和COP之间的分布无差异。在 PDI "家庭/居家责任 "领域,HM 患者的得分明显低于 NM 患者(4.5±3.2 vs. 6.4±2.8;p 结论:与正念态度低的患者相比,正念态度高的慢性疼痛患者经历的痛苦、焦虑和抑郁症状较少,身体和总体健康状况较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropsychiatry
Clinical Neuropsychiatry CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信