Retention and Patient Satisfaction of Conventional Over Simplified Non-Balanced Maxillary Removable Complete Dentures.

IF 1.1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-05-31 DOI:10.1922/EJPRD_2568Ponmani07

S Ponmani, N G Chander, K V Anitha, M Balasubramaniam

{"title":"Retention and Patient Satisfaction of Conventional Over Simplified Non-Balanced Maxillary Removable Complete Dentures.","authors":"S Ponmani, N G Chander, K V Anitha, M Balasubramaniam","doi":"10.1922/EJPRD_2568Ponmani07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Insufficient evidence is available in quantifying the retention between simplified and conventional non-balanced dentures. The aim of the study was to quantify and compare the maxillary denture retention and patient satisfaction between conventional and simplified removable non-balanced complete dentures.Method: This randomized clinical trial recruited 44 patients (n=22) with definitive criteria. Simplified and conventional non-balanced complete dentures were fabricated for the intervention groups. The denture retention of maxillary complete dentures was assessed with a dynamometer and patient satisfaction with a visual analogue scale. The mean retention of maxillary denture and satisfaction were recorded at 0-,3-, and 6 - month intervals. The data were statistically analyzed. (α=.05).Results: The mean ±SD of retention for conventional denture at 0, 3, and 6 months by dynamometer ranged from 122 ± 1.64 N to 121 ± 1.57 N and 111 ±1.45N to 110±1.97 N for the simplified denture. The mean ±SD of visual analogue score varied between 9.45±0.35 to 7.19± 0.69 for conventional dentures and 8.00 ±1.39 to 6.81±0.82 for simplified dentures. The repeated ANOVA, t-test and post-hoc Bonferroni revealed statistically significant differences between the two types of denture. (P⟨.05) Conclusion: Numerical retention and satisfaction were higher in conventional non-balanced dentures than simplified dentures.","PeriodicalId":45686,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2568Ponmani07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Insufficient evidence is available in quantifying the retention between simplified and conventional non-balanced dentures. The aim of the study was to quantify and compare the maxillary denture retention and patient satisfaction between conventional and simplified removable non-balanced complete dentures.

Method: This randomized clinical trial recruited 44 patients (n=22) with definitive criteria. Simplified and conventional non-balanced complete dentures were fabricated for the intervention groups. The denture retention of maxillary complete dentures was assessed with a dynamometer and patient satisfaction with a visual analogue scale. The mean retention of maxillary denture and satisfaction were recorded at 0-,3-, and 6 - month intervals. The data were statistically analyzed. (α=.05).

Results: The mean ±SD of retention for conventional denture at 0, 3, and 6 months by dynamometer ranged from 122 ± 1.64 N to 121 ± 1.57 N and 111 ±1.45N to 110±1.97 N for the simplified denture. The mean ±SD of visual analogue score varied between 9.45±0.35 to 7.19± 0.69 for conventional dentures and 8.00 ±1.39 to 6.81±0.82 for simplified dentures. The repeated ANOVA, t-test and post-hoc Bonferroni revealed statistically significant differences between the two types of denture. (P⟨.05) Conclusion: Numerical retention and satisfaction were higher in conventional non-balanced dentures than simplified dentures.

查看原文本刊更多论文

传统型比简化型非平衡上颌可摘全口义齿的固位和患者满意度。

目的：在量化简易义齿和传统非平衡义齿的固位情况方面，现有证据不足。本研究旨在量化和比较传统义齿和简化可摘非平衡全口义齿的上颌义齿固位情况和患者满意度：这项随机临床试验共招募了 44 名符合明确标准的患者（22 人）。为干预组制作了简易和常规非平衡全口义齿。用测力计评估上颌全口义齿的固位情况，用视觉模拟量表评估患者的满意度。上颌义齿的平均固位率和满意度分别在 0 个月、3 个月和 6 个月时进行记录。对数据进行了统计分析。(结果：传统义齿在 0、3 和 6 个月时的测力计保持力平均值（±SD）为 122 ± 1.64 N 至 121 ± 1.57 N，简化义齿为 111 ± 1.45 N 至 110 ± 1.97 N。传统义齿的视觉模拟评分平均值（±SD）在 9.45±0.35 到 7.19±0.69 之间，简化义齿的视觉模拟评分平均值（±SD）在 8.00±1.39 到 6.81±0.82 之间。经重复方差分析、t 检验和事后 Bonferroni 检验，两种义齿之间存在显著统计学差异。(P⟨.05）结论：传统非平衡义齿的数值保持率和满意度均高于简化义齿。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-

CiteScore

2.30

自引率

7.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry is published quarterly and includes clinical and research articles in subjects such as prosthodontics, operative dentistry, implantology, endodontics, periodontics and dental materials.