Comparison of P300 Cognitive-evoked Potentials and Visual and Auditory Reaction Time in Stage 5 Chronic Kidney Disease Patients on Different Treatment Modalities.

IF 0.5 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Manoharan Renugasundari, Subramaniyam Velkumary, Sreejith Parameswaran, Nivedita Nanda, Jean Fredrick
{"title":"Comparison of P300 Cognitive-evoked Potentials and Visual and Auditory Reaction Time in Stage 5 Chronic Kidney Disease Patients on Different Treatment Modalities.","authors":"Manoharan Renugasundari, Subramaniyam Velkumary, Sreejith Parameswaran, Nivedita Nanda, Jean Fredrick","doi":"10.4103/1319-2442.391001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at a higher risk of cognitive impairment. Poor quality of life and decreased compliance are frequently observed with cognitive decline among CKD patients. Cognitive impairment among Stage 5 CKD patients varies with different modalities of treatment, and contradicting results have been reported. Fifty-four medically stable Stage 5 CKD patients undergoing different modalities of treatment were recruited: Patients with Stage 5 CKD on maintenance hemodialysis (HD) (n = 18), continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) (n = 18), and conservative management (CM) (n = 18). Eighteen apparently healthy participants were recruited as a control group. The cognitive functions assessed were P300 event- related potential, auditory and visual reaction times (VRTs). Kidney function was assessed by serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Creatinine levels were significantly higher in all three treatment groups compared with the control group. Multivariate analysis revealed a significant association between the CKD groups (n = 54) and the parameters of cognitive function. P300 latency was prolonged in all treatment groups compared with the control group and was significantly prolonged in patients on CM compared with HD and CAPD patients. The VRT of CM patients was found to be significantly higher compared with the control group. The auditory reaction time was significantly prolonged in all treatment groups compared with the control group and in the CM group compared with the CAPD group. Cognitive function was more affected in Stage 5 CKD patients on CM compared with patients undergoing HD or CAPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":21356,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation","volume":"34 1","pages":"42-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/1319-2442.391001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at a higher risk of cognitive impairment. Poor quality of life and decreased compliance are frequently observed with cognitive decline among CKD patients. Cognitive impairment among Stage 5 CKD patients varies with different modalities of treatment, and contradicting results have been reported. Fifty-four medically stable Stage 5 CKD patients undergoing different modalities of treatment were recruited: Patients with Stage 5 CKD on maintenance hemodialysis (HD) (n = 18), continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) (n = 18), and conservative management (CM) (n = 18). Eighteen apparently healthy participants were recruited as a control group. The cognitive functions assessed were P300 event- related potential, auditory and visual reaction times (VRTs). Kidney function was assessed by serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Creatinine levels were significantly higher in all three treatment groups compared with the control group. Multivariate analysis revealed a significant association between the CKD groups (n = 54) and the parameters of cognitive function. P300 latency was prolonged in all treatment groups compared with the control group and was significantly prolonged in patients on CM compared with HD and CAPD patients. The VRT of CM patients was found to be significantly higher compared with the control group. The auditory reaction time was significantly prolonged in all treatment groups compared with the control group and in the CM group compared with the CAPD group. Cognitive function was more affected in Stage 5 CKD patients on CM compared with patients undergoing HD or CAPD.

不同治疗模式下慢性肾脏病 5 期患者 P300 认知诱发电位与视听反应时间的比较
慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者出现认知障碍的风险较高。随着认知能力的下降,慢性肾脏病患者经常会出现生活质量下降和依从性降低的情况。第 5 期慢性肾脏病患者的认知功能损害因不同的治疗方式而异,有报道称结果相互矛盾。研究人员招募了 54 名接受不同方式治疗的病情稳定的 5 期 CKD 患者:接受维持性血液透析(HD)(18 人)、持续非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)(18 人)和保守治疗(CM)(18 人)的 5 期 CKD 患者。另外还招募了 18 名表面健康的参与者作为对照组。评估的认知功能包括 P300 事件相关电位、听觉和视觉反应时间(VRT)。肾功能通过血清肌酐和估计肾小球滤过率进行评估。与对照组相比,三个治疗组的肌酐水平均明显升高。多变量分析显示,CKD 组(n = 54)与认知功能参数之间存在显著关联。与对照组相比,所有治疗组的 P300 潜伏期均延长,与 HD 和 CAPD 患者相比,CM 患者的 P300 潜伏期明显延长。与对照组相比,CM 患者的 VRT 明显更高。与对照组相比,所有治疗组的听觉反应时间都明显延长;与 CAPD 组相比,CM 组的听觉反应时间也明显延长。与接受 HD 或 CAPD 治疗的患者相比,接受 CM 治疗的 5 期 CKD 患者的认知功能受到的影响更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊介绍: Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation (SJKDT, ISSN 1319-2442) is the official publication of the Saudi Center for Organ Transplantation, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. It is published six times a year. SJKDT publishes peer-reviewed original research work and review papers related to kidney diseases, urinary tract, renal replacement therapies, and transplantation. The journal publishes original papers and reviews on cell therapy and islet transplantation, clinical transplantation, experimental transplantation, immunobiology and genomics and xenotransplantation related to the kidney. The journal also publishes short communications, case studies, letters to the editors, an annotated bibliography and a column on news and views.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信