The Effect of Exercise on Cardiotoxicity in Women with Breast Cancer Receiving Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Oncology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-15 DOI:10.1159/000535737
Cho-Han Chiang, Yu-Cheng Chang, Yulin Haw, Jia Yi Tan, Cho-Hsien Chiang, Yuan Ping Hsia, Cho-Hung Chiang
{"title":"The Effect of Exercise on Cardiotoxicity in Women with Breast Cancer Receiving Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Cho-Han Chiang, Yu-Cheng Chang, Yulin Haw, Jia Yi Tan, Cho-Hsien Chiang, Yuan Ping Hsia, Cho-Hung Chiang","doi":"10.1159/000535737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women with a 5-year survival over 90%. However, anthracycline-based chemotherapy causes significant cardiotoxicity often requiring discontinuation of chemotherapeutic regimen among breast cancer survivors. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of exercise training in mitigating anthracycline-related cardiotoxicity among women with breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. The outcomes of interest were left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), global longitudinal strain (GLS), early to atrial filling velocity (E/A) ratio, maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 max), and cardiac output (CO). We used the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) to assess the risk of bias in individual studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified a total of 596 articles with 5 trials included in the final analysis. Exercise training was associated with an increase in VO2 max compared with no exercise training (mean difference, 3.95 [95% CI, 0.63-7.26]; I2 = 99.68%). Other cardiovascular outcomes such as LVEF (mean difference, 1.76 [95% CI, -1.95 to 5.46]; I2 = 99.44%), GLS (mean difference, 0.30 [95% CI, -0.49 to 1.10]; I2 = 96.63%), E/A ratio (mean difference, 0.05 [95% CI, -0.05 to 0.15]; I2 = 94.16%), and CO (mean difference, 0.38 [95% CI, -0.91 to 1.66]; I2 = 99.73%) are similar between patients who underwent exercise training and those who did not.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Exercise was associated with an improvement in maximal oxygen uptake among women with breast cancer receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19497,"journal":{"name":"Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11151974/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000535737","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women with a 5-year survival over 90%. However, anthracycline-based chemotherapy causes significant cardiotoxicity often requiring discontinuation of chemotherapeutic regimen among breast cancer survivors. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of exercise training in mitigating anthracycline-related cardiotoxicity among women with breast cancer.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. The outcomes of interest were left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), global longitudinal strain (GLS), early to atrial filling velocity (E/A) ratio, maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 max), and cardiac output (CO). We used the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) to assess the risk of bias in individual studies.

Results: We identified a total of 596 articles with 5 trials included in the final analysis. Exercise training was associated with an increase in VO2 max compared with no exercise training (mean difference, 3.95 [95% CI, 0.63-7.26]; I2 = 99.68%). Other cardiovascular outcomes such as LVEF (mean difference, 1.76 [95% CI, -1.95 to 5.46]; I2 = 99.44%), GLS (mean difference, 0.30 [95% CI, -0.49 to 1.10]; I2 = 96.63%), E/A ratio (mean difference, 0.05 [95% CI, -0.05 to 0.15]; I2 = 94.16%), and CO (mean difference, 0.38 [95% CI, -0.91 to 1.66]; I2 = 99.73%) are similar between patients who underwent exercise training and those who did not.

Conclusions: Exercise was associated with an improvement in maximal oxygen uptake among women with breast cancer receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy.

运动对接受蒽环类化疗的乳腺癌女性患者心脏毒性的影响:系统回顾与元分析》。
导言乳腺癌是女性最常见的癌症,5 年生存率超过 90%。然而,蒽环类化疗会导致严重的心脏毒性,乳腺癌幸存者往往需要停止化疗。我们进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,以评估运动训练在减轻乳腺癌女性患者中与蒽环类药物相关的心脏毒性方面的疗效:我们检索了 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、Web of Science 和 Scopus 数据库。研究结果包括左心室射血分数(LVEF)、整体纵向应变(GLS)、早期心房充盈速度(E/A)比值、最大耗氧量(VO2 max)和心输出量(CO)。我们使用科克伦随机试验偏倚风险工具(RoB 2)来评估各项研究的偏倚风险:结果:我们共发现了 596 篇文章,其中 5 项试验被纳入最终分析。与不进行运动训练相比,运动训练与最大容氧量的增加有关(平均差异为 3.95 [95% CI,0.63 至 7.26];I2 = 99.68%)。其他心血管结果,如 LVEF(平均差异,1.76 [95% CI,-1.95 至 5.46];I2 = 99.44%)、GLS(平均差异,0.30 [95% CI,-0.49 至 1.10];I2 = 96.63%)、E/A 比值(平均差异,0.05 [95% CI, -0.05 to 0.15]; I2 = 94.16%)和 CO(平均差异,0.38 [95% CI, -0.91 to 1.66]; I2 = 99.73%)在接受运动训练和未接受运动训练的患者之间相似:结论:在接受蒽环类化疗的乳腺癌女性患者中,运动与最大摄氧量的改善有关。.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncology
Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Although laboratory and clinical cancer research need to be closely linked, observations at the basic level often remain removed from medical applications. This journal works to accelerate the translation of experimental results into the clinic, and back again into the laboratory for further investigation. The fundamental purpose of this effort is to advance clinically-relevant knowledge of cancer, and improve the outcome of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The journal publishes significant clinical studies from cancer programs around the world, along with important translational laboratory findings, mini-reviews (invited and submitted) and in-depth discussions of evolving and controversial topics in the oncology arena. A unique feature of the journal is a new section which focuses on rapid peer-review and subsequent publication of short reports of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical cancer trials, with a goal of insuring that high-quality clinical cancer research quickly enters the public domain, regardless of the trial’s ultimate conclusions regarding efficacy or toxicity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信