Improving access to advanced veterinary care for rescued cats and dogs.

IF 1.9 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Ann E Hohenhaus
{"title":"Improving access to advanced veterinary care for rescued cats and dogs.","authors":"Ann E Hohenhaus","doi":"10.1177/1098612X231211755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of this study were as follows: (1) to describe the AMC to the Rescue (AMCTTR) funding criteria and the application process; (2) to describe the distribution of species cared for through the program, the medical conditions treated in cats compared with those treated in dogs and the cost of that care; and (3) to define the successes and challenges of the program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The AMCTTR database was reviewed for applications submitted between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2022. Data collected included the following: the date of application; rescue organization seeking financial support; species; age of pet at time of application; expenditures funded by AMCTTR; and the method by which the rescue organization learned about AMCTTR. The animals in the AMCTTR database were sorted into two groups: those accepted for funding and those that did not meet funding criteria. The Animal Medical Center (AMC) medical record system was searched for the total number of individual animals, species and age seen at AMC during the study period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 267 applications were reviewed and 190 applications from 134 cats, 52 dogs and four rabbits were accepted for advanced veterinary care funded by AMCTTR. Over the 3-year study period, US$612,564 were awarded and over half of those funds were awarded to cats. The average expenditure per animal during this time period was US$3224. The most common referrals to AMCTTR were made to ophthalmology, surgery and dentistry.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The needs of cats differed from dogs in that feline applications were most commonly submitted for ophthalmology or dentistry. Expenditures per cat were less than per dog because dogs were referred for more expensive orthopedic surgery. The need for advanced veterinary care for rescue animals is enormous, especially for cats. Programs that subsidize advanced veterinary care increase access to that care.</p>","PeriodicalId":15851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10811763/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X231211755","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of this study were as follows: (1) to describe the AMC to the Rescue (AMCTTR) funding criteria and the application process; (2) to describe the distribution of species cared for through the program, the medical conditions treated in cats compared with those treated in dogs and the cost of that care; and (3) to define the successes and challenges of the program.

Methods: The AMCTTR database was reviewed for applications submitted between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2022. Data collected included the following: the date of application; rescue organization seeking financial support; species; age of pet at time of application; expenditures funded by AMCTTR; and the method by which the rescue organization learned about AMCTTR. The animals in the AMCTTR database were sorted into two groups: those accepted for funding and those that did not meet funding criteria. The Animal Medical Center (AMC) medical record system was searched for the total number of individual animals, species and age seen at AMC during the study period.

Results: In total, 267 applications were reviewed and 190 applications from 134 cats, 52 dogs and four rabbits were accepted for advanced veterinary care funded by AMCTTR. Over the 3-year study period, US$612,564 were awarded and over half of those funds were awarded to cats. The average expenditure per animal during this time period was US$3224. The most common referrals to AMCTTR were made to ophthalmology, surgery and dentistry.

Conclusions and relevance: The needs of cats differed from dogs in that feline applications were most commonly submitted for ophthalmology or dentistry. Expenditures per cat were less than per dog because dogs were referred for more expensive orthopedic surgery. The need for advanced veterinary care for rescue animals is enormous, especially for cats. Programs that subsidize advanced veterinary care increase access to that care.

改善获救猫狗获得先进兽医护理的机会。
目标:本研究的目标如下(1)描述 "拯救猫科动物 "项目(AMC to the Rescue,AMCTTR)的资助标准和申请流程;(2)描述通过该项目接受治疗的物种分布情况、猫科动物与犬科动物接受治疗的病症对比情况以及治疗费用;(3)确定该项目取得的成功和面临的挑战:对 AMCTTR 数据库中 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间提交的申请进行了审查。收集的数据包括:申请日期;寻求资助的救援组织;物种;申请时宠物的年龄;AMCTTR 资助的支出;以及救援组织了解 AMCTTR 的方式。AMCTTR 数据库中的动物被分为两组:接受资助的动物和不符合资助标准的动物。在动物医疗中心(AMC)的医疗记录系统中搜索了研究期间在AMC就诊的动物个体总数、种类和年龄:共审查了 267 份申请,接受了来自 134 只猫、52 只狗和 4 只兔子的 190 份申请,由 AMCTTR 提供高级兽医护理资助。在为期 3 年的研究期间,共发放了 612,564 美元,其中一半以上的资金发放给了猫。在此期间,每只动物的平均花费为 3224 美元。AMCTTR最常转诊的动物是眼科、外科和牙科:猫的需求与狗不同,猫科动物最常申请眼科或牙科治疗。每只猫的花费低于每只狗,因为狗需要转诊接受更昂贵的整形外科手术。救助动物对高级兽医护理的需求巨大,尤其是猫。为高级兽医护理提供补贴的计划可增加获得这种护理的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
17.60%
发文量
254
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: JFMS is an international, peer-reviewed journal aimed at both practitioners and researchers with an interest in the clinical veterinary healthcare of domestic cats. The journal is published monthly in two formats: ‘Classic’ editions containing high-quality original papers on all aspects of feline medicine and surgery, including basic research relevant to clinical practice; and dedicated ‘Clinical Practice’ editions primarily containing opinionated review articles providing state-of-the-art information for feline clinicians, along with other relevant articles such as consensus guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信