Superior antibody and membrane protein-specific T-cell responses to CoronaVac by intradermal versus intramuscular routes in adolescents.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
World Journal of Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-12 DOI:10.1007/s12519-023-00764-0
Jaime S Rosa Duque, Samuel M S Cheng, Carolyn A Cohen, Daniel Leung, Xiwei Wang, Xiaofeng Mu, Yuet Chung, Tsun Ming Lau, Manni Wang, Wenyue Zhang, Yanmei Zhang, Howard H W Wong, Leo C H Tsang, Sara Chaothai, Tsz Chun Kwan, John K C Li, Karl C K Chan, Leo L H Luk, Jenson C H Ho, Wing Yan Li, Amos M T Lee, Jennifer H Y Lam, Sau Man Chan, Wilfred H S Wong, Issan Y S Tam, Masashi Mori, Sophie A Valkenburg, Malik Peiris, Wenwei Tu, Yu Lung Lau
{"title":"Superior antibody and membrane protein-specific T-cell responses to CoronaVac by intradermal versus intramuscular routes in adolescents.","authors":"Jaime S Rosa Duque, Samuel M S Cheng, Carolyn A Cohen, Daniel Leung, Xiwei Wang, Xiaofeng Mu, Yuet Chung, Tsun Ming Lau, Manni Wang, Wenyue Zhang, Yanmei Zhang, Howard H W Wong, Leo C H Tsang, Sara Chaothai, Tsz Chun Kwan, John K C Li, Karl C K Chan, Leo L H Luk, Jenson C H Ho, Wing Yan Li, Amos M T Lee, Jennifer H Y Lam, Sau Man Chan, Wilfred H S Wong, Issan Y S Tam, Masashi Mori, Sophie A Valkenburg, Malik Peiris, Wenwei Tu, Yu Lung Lau","doi":"10.1007/s12519-023-00764-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Optimising the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines to improve their protection against disease is necessary. Fractional dosing by intradermal (ID) administration has been shown to be equally immunogenic as intramuscular (IM) administration for several vaccines, but the immunogenicity of ID inactivated whole severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) at the full dose is unknown. This study (NCT04800133) investigated the superiority of antibody and T-cell responses of full-dose CoronaVac by ID over IM administration in adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants aged 11-17 years received two doses of IM or ID vaccine, followed by the 3rd dose 13-42 days later. Humoral and cellular immunogenicity outcomes were measured post-dose 2 (IM-CC versus ID-CC) and post-dose 3 (IM-CCC versus ID-CCC). Doses 2 and 3 were administered to 173 and 104 adolescents, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Spike protein (S) immunoglobulin G (IgG), S-receptor-binding domain (RBD) IgG, S IgG Fcγ receptor IIIa (FcγRIIIa)-binding, SNM [sum of individual (S), nucleocapsid protein (N), and membrane protein (M) peptide pool]-specific interleukin-2 (IL-2)<sup>+</sup>CD4<sup>+</sup>, SNM-specific IL-2<sup>+</sup>CD8<sup>+</sup>, S-specific IL-2<sup>+</sup>CD8<sup>+</sup>, N-specific IL-2<sup>+</sup>CD4<sup>+</sup>, N-specific IL-2<sup>+</sup>CD8<sup>+</sup> and M-specific IL-2<sup>+</sup>CD4<sup>+</sup> responses fulfilled the superior and non-inferior criteria for ID-CC compared to IM-CC, whereas IgG avidity was inferior. For ID-CCC, S-RBD IgG, surrogate virus neutralisation test, 90% plaque reduction neutralisation titre (PRNT90), PRNT50, S IgG avidity, S IgG FcγRIIIa-binding, M-specific IL-2<sup>+</sup>CD4<sup>+</sup>, interferon-γ<sup>+</sup>CD8<sup>+</sup> and IL-2<sup>+</sup>CD8<sup>+</sup> responses were superior and non-inferior to IM-CCC. The estimated vaccine efficacies were 49%, 52%, 66% and 79% for IM-CC, ID-CC, IM-CCC and ID-CCC, respectively. The ID groups reported more local, mild adverse reactions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first study to demonstrate superior antibody and M-specific T-cell responses by ID inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and serves as the basis for future research to improve the immunogenicity of inactivated vaccines.</p>","PeriodicalId":23883,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"353-370"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11052846/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-023-00764-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Optimising the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines to improve their protection against disease is necessary. Fractional dosing by intradermal (ID) administration has been shown to be equally immunogenic as intramuscular (IM) administration for several vaccines, but the immunogenicity of ID inactivated whole severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) at the full dose is unknown. This study (NCT04800133) investigated the superiority of antibody and T-cell responses of full-dose CoronaVac by ID over IM administration in adolescents.

Methods: Participants aged 11-17 years received two doses of IM or ID vaccine, followed by the 3rd dose 13-42 days later. Humoral and cellular immunogenicity outcomes were measured post-dose 2 (IM-CC versus ID-CC) and post-dose 3 (IM-CCC versus ID-CCC). Doses 2 and 3 were administered to 173 and 104 adolescents, respectively.

Results: Spike protein (S) immunoglobulin G (IgG), S-receptor-binding domain (RBD) IgG, S IgG Fcγ receptor IIIa (FcγRIIIa)-binding, SNM [sum of individual (S), nucleocapsid protein (N), and membrane protein (M) peptide pool]-specific interleukin-2 (IL-2)+CD4+, SNM-specific IL-2+CD8+, S-specific IL-2+CD8+, N-specific IL-2+CD4+, N-specific IL-2+CD8+ and M-specific IL-2+CD4+ responses fulfilled the superior and non-inferior criteria for ID-CC compared to IM-CC, whereas IgG avidity was inferior. For ID-CCC, S-RBD IgG, surrogate virus neutralisation test, 90% plaque reduction neutralisation titre (PRNT90), PRNT50, S IgG avidity, S IgG FcγRIIIa-binding, M-specific IL-2+CD4+, interferon-γ+CD8+ and IL-2+CD8+ responses were superior and non-inferior to IM-CCC. The estimated vaccine efficacies were 49%, 52%, 66% and 79% for IM-CC, ID-CC, IM-CCC and ID-CCC, respectively. The ID groups reported more local, mild adverse reactions.

Conclusion: This is the first study to demonstrate superior antibody and M-specific T-cell responses by ID inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and serves as the basis for future research to improve the immunogenicity of inactivated vaccines.

Abstract Image

青少年皮内与肌肉注射 CoronaVac 的抗体和膜蛋白特异性 T 细胞反应效果更佳。
背景:有必要优化 COVID-19 疫苗的免疫原性,以提高其对疾病的保护能力。对几种疫苗来说,通过皮内注射(ID)进行分次给药已被证明与肌肉注射(IM)具有相同的免疫原性,但全量ID灭活全株严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的免疫原性尚不清楚。本研究(NCT04800133)调查了在青少年中以 ID 方式接种全剂量 CoronaVac 的抗体和 T 细胞反应优于以 IM 方式接种的情况:方法: 11-17岁的参与者接种两剂IM或ID疫苗,13-42天后接种第3剂。对第 2 剂(IM-CC 与 ID-CC)和第 3 剂(IM-CCC 与 ID-CCC)后的体液和细胞免疫原性结果进行了测定。第 2 剂和第 3 剂分别用于 173 名和 104 名青少年:尖峰蛋白(S)免疫球蛋白 G(IgG)、S-受体结合域(RBD)IgG、S IgG Fcγ 受体 IIIa(FcγRIIIa)结合、SNM[个体(S)、核帽蛋白(N)和膜蛋白(M)肽池之和]-特异性白细胞介素-2(IL-2)+CD4+、SNM-特异性IL-2+CD4+、SNM-特异性IL-2+CD4+、SNM-特异性IL-2+CD4+、SNM-特异性IL-2+CD4+、SNM特异性IL-2+CD8+、S特异性IL-2+CD8+、N特异性IL-2+CD4+、N特异性IL-2+CD8+和M特异性IL-2+CD4+反应符合ID-CC优于IM-CC和非劣的标准,而IgG热度则较低。对于 ID-CCC,S-RBD IgG、代用病毒中和试验、90%斑块缩小中和滴度(PRNT90)、PRNT50、S IgG 效价、S IgG FcγRIIIa 结合力、M 特异性 IL-2+CD4+、干扰素-γ+CD8+ 和 IL-2+CD8+ 反应均优于 IM-CCC,而非劣于 IM-CCC。IM-CCC、ID-CC、IM-CCC 和 ID-CCC 的估计疫苗有效率分别为 49%、52%、66% 和 79%。ID组报告的局部轻度不良反应较多:结论:这是第一项证明接种 ID 灭活 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗能产生较好的抗体和 M 特异性 T 细胞反应的研究,为今后提高灭活疫苗免疫原性的研究奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Pediatrics
World Journal of Pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
1.10%
发文量
592
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The World Journal of Pediatrics, a monthly publication, is dedicated to disseminating peer-reviewed original papers, reviews, and special reports focusing on clinical practice and research in pediatrics. We welcome contributions from pediatricians worldwide on new developments across all areas of pediatrics, including pediatric surgery, preventive healthcare, pharmacology, stomatology, and biomedicine. The journal also covers basic sciences and experimental work, serving as a comprehensive academic platform for the international exchange of medical findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信