Matthew L Magruder, Shabnam Parsa, Adam M Gordon, Mitchell Ng, Che Hang J Wong
{"title":"Inflammatory bowel disease patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty have higher odds of implant-related complications.","authors":"Matthew L Magruder, Shabnam Parsa, Adam M Gordon, Mitchell Ng, Che Hang J Wong","doi":"10.1177/11207000231214768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates whether IBD patients are at increased risk of implant-related complications after THA.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective study from 01 January 2010 to 31 October 31 2020 using an administrative claims database was performed. IBD patients undergoing THA (<i>n</i> = 11,025), without corticosteroid treatment, were propensity score matched to controls in a 1:5 ratio (<i>n</i> = 55,121) based on age, sex, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Outcomes evaluated included periprosthetic fracture, aseptic loosening, prosthetic joint infection, and THA revision within 2 years of index procedure. Chi-square analyses were used to compare the matched cohorts. The association of IBD and implant-related complications was evaluated using logistical regression to calculate odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), and <i>p</i>-values. A <i>p-</i>value < 0.001 was used as the significance threshold.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with IBD had a greater incidence and odds of total implant complications (7.03% vs. 3.98%; OR 1.76; <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared with matched controls. IBD patients had significantly higher incidence and odds of developing periprosthetic fracture (0.50% vs. 0.20%; OR 2.46; <i>p</i> < 0.001), THA revisions (2.21% vs. 1.17%; OR 1.91; <i>p</i> < 0.001), aseptic loosening (1.45% vs. 0.84%; OR 1.75; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and prosthetic joint infection (2.87% vs. 1.77%; OR 1.64; <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with IBD who underwent primary THA had a significantly higher risk of implant-related complications compared to matched controls. Providers should use this study to appropriately assess post-complication risk factors for their patients with IBD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12911,"journal":{"name":"HIP International","volume":" ","pages":"498-502"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIP International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11207000231214768","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluates whether IBD patients are at increased risk of implant-related complications after THA.
Materials and methods: A retrospective study from 01 January 2010 to 31 October 31 2020 using an administrative claims database was performed. IBD patients undergoing THA (n = 11,025), without corticosteroid treatment, were propensity score matched to controls in a 1:5 ratio (n = 55,121) based on age, sex, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Outcomes evaluated included periprosthetic fracture, aseptic loosening, prosthetic joint infection, and THA revision within 2 years of index procedure. Chi-square analyses were used to compare the matched cohorts. The association of IBD and implant-related complications was evaluated using logistical regression to calculate odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), and p-values. A p-value < 0.001 was used as the significance threshold.
Results: Patients with IBD had a greater incidence and odds of total implant complications (7.03% vs. 3.98%; OR 1.76; p < 0.001) compared with matched controls. IBD patients had significantly higher incidence and odds of developing periprosthetic fracture (0.50% vs. 0.20%; OR 2.46; p < 0.001), THA revisions (2.21% vs. 1.17%; OR 1.91; p < 0.001), aseptic loosening (1.45% vs. 0.84%; OR 1.75; p < 0.001), and prosthetic joint infection (2.87% vs. 1.77%; OR 1.64; p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Patients with IBD who underwent primary THA had a significantly higher risk of implant-related complications compared to matched controls. Providers should use this study to appropriately assess post-complication risk factors for their patients with IBD.
期刊介绍:
HIP International is the official journal of the European Hip Society. It is the only international, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal dedicated to diseases of the hip. HIP International considers contributions relating to hip surgery, traumatology of the hip, prosthetic surgery, biomechanics, and basic sciences relating to the hip. HIP International invites reviews from leading specialists with the aim of informing its readers of current evidence-based best practice.
The journal also publishes supplements containing proceedings of symposia, special meetings or articles of special educational merit.
HIP International is divided into six independent sections led by editors of the highest scientific merit. These sections are:
• Biomaterials
• Biomechanics
• Conservative Hip Surgery
• Paediatrics
• Primary and Revision Hip Arthroplasty
• Traumatology