Endonasal Endoscopic Optic Canal Decompression for Nontraumatic Optic Neuropathy: Long-Term Visual Outcomes in 36 Patients.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-14 DOI:10.1097/WNO.0000000000002062
Romain Manet, Francesco Calvanese, Gianpaolo Jannelli, Alberto Delaidelli, Jules Fricker, Sarah Verrecchia, Caroline Froment Tilikete, Emmanuel Jouanneau
{"title":"Endonasal Endoscopic Optic Canal Decompression for Nontraumatic Optic Neuropathy: Long-Term Visual Outcomes in 36 Patients.","authors":"Romain Manet, Francesco Calvanese, Gianpaolo Jannelli, Alberto Delaidelli, Jules Fricker, Sarah Verrecchia, Caroline Froment Tilikete, Emmanuel Jouanneau","doi":"10.1097/WNO.0000000000002062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of compressive optic neuropathy (CON) arising from nontraumatic compression of the optic nerve within the optic canal (OC) remains a topic of controversy. In this study, our aim was to assess the effectiveness and safety of endonasal endoscopic optic nerve decompression (EEOND). In addition, we conducted an analysis of prognostic factors that could potentially influence visual outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study was conducted between January 2015 and December 2021, involving adult patients (age > 18) diagnosed with CON and treated with EEOND at our specialized skull base expert center. The study evaluated the impact of surgery on visual acuity (VA), mean deficit (MD), and foveal threshold (FT) of the visual field (VF). These parameters were assessed preoperatively and at 3- and 12-month postoperative follow-ups. The relationship between clinical variables and the differences in postoperative to preoperative VA, MD, and FT of the visual field was analyzed through univariate and multivariate approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six patients (38 eyes) were included, with a mean age of 52 (±12) years, and a female predominance (78%). The mean ophthalmologic follow-up duration was 38 (±32) months. At the 12-month follow-up, 39% of the patients exhibited a VA improvement of ≥0.2 LogMAR. Partial VF improvement (MD improvement ≥25%) was observed in 55% of the patients, whereas 19% experienced complete recovery. In multivariate analysis, the presence of a type 4 OC was identified as the sole negative prognostic factor for visual improvement (VA and VF) at 12 months. Six patients (17%) encountered minor surgical complications, all of which were managed conservatively and had no impact on visual outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrates that EEOND is a safe and effective procedure, even in cases of severe and long-lasting CON caused by nontraumatic compression of the optic nerve at the level of the OC.</p>","PeriodicalId":16485,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"511-516"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0000000000002062","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The management of compressive optic neuropathy (CON) arising from nontraumatic compression of the optic nerve within the optic canal (OC) remains a topic of controversy. In this study, our aim was to assess the effectiveness and safety of endonasal endoscopic optic nerve decompression (EEOND). In addition, we conducted an analysis of prognostic factors that could potentially influence visual outcomes.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted between January 2015 and December 2021, involving adult patients (age > 18) diagnosed with CON and treated with EEOND at our specialized skull base expert center. The study evaluated the impact of surgery on visual acuity (VA), mean deficit (MD), and foveal threshold (FT) of the visual field (VF). These parameters were assessed preoperatively and at 3- and 12-month postoperative follow-ups. The relationship between clinical variables and the differences in postoperative to preoperative VA, MD, and FT of the visual field was analyzed through univariate and multivariate approaches.

Results: Thirty-six patients (38 eyes) were included, with a mean age of 52 (±12) years, and a female predominance (78%). The mean ophthalmologic follow-up duration was 38 (±32) months. At the 12-month follow-up, 39% of the patients exhibited a VA improvement of ≥0.2 LogMAR. Partial VF improvement (MD improvement ≥25%) was observed in 55% of the patients, whereas 19% experienced complete recovery. In multivariate analysis, the presence of a type 4 OC was identified as the sole negative prognostic factor for visual improvement (VA and VF) at 12 months. Six patients (17%) encountered minor surgical complications, all of which were managed conservatively and had no impact on visual outcomes.

Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that EEOND is a safe and effective procedure, even in cases of severe and long-lasting CON caused by nontraumatic compression of the optic nerve at the level of the OC.

治疗非外伤性视神经病变的鼻内镜下视神经管减压术:36 例患者的长期视觉疗效。
背景:视神经在视管(OC)内受到非外伤性压迫而引起的压迫性视神经病变(CON)的治疗方法仍存在争议。在这项研究中,我们的目的是评估鼻内镜视神经减压术(EEOND)的有效性和安全性。此外,我们还对可能影响视力结果的预后因素进行了分析:这项回顾性队列研究是在 2015 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间进行的,涉及在我们的专业颅底专家中心确诊为 CON 并接受 EEOND 治疗的成年患者(年龄大于 18 岁)。研究评估了手术对视力(VA)、平均缺损(MD)和视野(VF)的眼窝阈值(FT)的影响。这些参数在术前、术后 3 个月和 12 个月的随访中进行了评估。通过单变量和多变量方法分析了临床变量与术后视野 VA、MD 和 FT 与术前差异之间的关系:共纳入 36 名患者(38 只眼),平均年龄为 52(±12)岁,女性占多数(78%)。平均眼科随访时间为 38 (±32) 个月。在 12 个月的随访中,39% 的患者视力改善≥0.2 LogMAR。55%的患者视力有部分改善(MD改善≥25%),19%的患者视力完全恢复。在多变量分析中,4 型 OC 的存在被确定为 12 个月视力改善(VA 和 VF)的唯一负面预后因素。6名患者(17%)出现了轻微的手术并发症,所有这些并发症都得到了保守治疗,对视力结果没有影响:我们的研究表明,EEOND是一种安全有效的手术,即使是在OC水平非外伤性压迫视神经引起的严重和持久的CON病例中也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology
Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
13.80%
发文量
593
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology (JNO) is the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society (NANOS). It is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original and commissioned articles related to neuro-ophthalmology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信