Extraction of the pull force from inertial sensors during the pull test for Parkinson's disease: A reliability study.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Movement Disorders Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-15 DOI:10.14802/jmd.23185
Ryoma Taniuchi, Shusaku Kanai, Amane Hara, Kazuya Monden, Hiroaki Nagatani, Tsuyoshi Torii, Toshihide Harada
{"title":"Extraction of the pull force from inertial sensors during the pull test for Parkinson's disease: A reliability study.","authors":"Ryoma Taniuchi, Shusaku Kanai, Amane Hara, Kazuya Monden, Hiroaki Nagatani, Tsuyoshi Torii, Toshihide Harada","doi":"10.14802/jmd.23185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the inter- and intra-rater reliability of the pull test in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) using the extracted pull force.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this inter- and intra-rater reliability study, two raters performed a pull test on 30 patients with PD. The pull force was quantified using inertial sensors attached to the rater's right hand and the patient's lower trunk. In this study, the pull force was calculated as an extracted three-dimensional vector quantity, the resultant acceleration, and was expressed in m/s2. Inter- and intra-rater reliabilities were analyzed using the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the pull force and Cohen's weighted kappa (κw) for the pull test score. Furthermore, Bland-Altman analysis was used to investigate systematic errors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The inter- and intra-rater reliability of the pull force was very poor (ICC = 0.033-0.214). Bland-Altman analysis revealed no systematic errors in the pull forces between the two test points. Conversely, κw for the pull test scores ranged from 0.763 to 0.920, indicating substantial to almost perfect agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pull test score was reliable despite variations in the quantified pull force for inter- and intra-rater reliability. Our findings suggest that the pull test is a robust tool for evaluating postural instability in patients with PD and that the pull force probably does not affect scoring performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":16372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Movement Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"150-157"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11082607/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Movement Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14802/jmd.23185","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine the inter- and intra-rater reliability of the pull test in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) using the extracted pull force.

Methods: In this inter- and intra-rater reliability study, two raters performed a pull test on 30 patients with PD. The pull force was quantified using inertial sensors attached to the rater's right hand and the patient's lower trunk. In this study, the pull force was calculated as an extracted three-dimensional vector quantity, the resultant acceleration, and was expressed in m/s2. Inter- and intra-rater reliabilities were analyzed using the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the pull force and Cohen's weighted kappa (κw) for the pull test score. Furthermore, Bland-Altman analysis was used to investigate systematic errors.

Results: The inter- and intra-rater reliability of the pull force was very poor (ICC = 0.033-0.214). Bland-Altman analysis revealed no systematic errors in the pull forces between the two test points. Conversely, κw for the pull test scores ranged from 0.763 to 0.920, indicating substantial to almost perfect agreement.

Conclusion: The pull test score was reliable despite variations in the quantified pull force for inter- and intra-rater reliability. Our findings suggest that the pull test is a robust tool for evaluating postural instability in patients with PD and that the pull force probably does not affect scoring performance.

从惯性传感器中提取帕金森病拉力测试中的拉力:可靠性研究
目的利用提取的拉力,研究帕金森病(PD)患者拉力测试的评分者之间和评分者内部的可靠性:在这项评分者之间和评分者内部的可靠性研究中,两名评分者对 30 名帕金森病患者进行了牵拉测试。拉力是通过连接在评分者右手和患者躯干下部的惯性传感器进行量化的。该研究将拉力计算为一个提取的三维矢量量,即结果加速度,单位为 m/s2。使用拉力的类间相关系数(ICC)和拉力测试得分的科恩加权卡帕(κw)分析了评分者之间和评分者内部的可靠性。此外,还采用了布兰-阿尔特曼分析法来研究系统误差:结果:拉力的评分者之间和评分者内部的信度都很低(ICC = 0.033-0.214)。布兰-阿尔特曼分析显示,两个测试点的拉力之间没有系统误差。相反,拉力测试得分的κw为0.763-0.920,表明几乎完全一致:结论:尽管量化的拉力在评分者之间和评分者内部的可靠性存在差异,但拉力测试得分是可靠的。我们的研究结果表明,牵拉试验是评估帕金森病患者姿势不稳定性的可靠工具,牵拉力可能不会影响评分结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Movement Disorders
Journal of Movement Disorders CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.10%
发文量
49
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信