Exploring Patients' Perceptions on Injectable Opioid Agonist Treatment: Influences on Treatment Initiation and Implications for Practice.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
European Addiction Research Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-15 DOI:10.1159/000535416
Zoe Friedmann, Annette Binder, Hans-Tilmann Kinkel, Claudia Kühner, Andreas Zsolnai, Inge Mick
{"title":"Exploring Patients' Perceptions on Injectable Opioid Agonist Treatment: Influences on Treatment Initiation and Implications for Practice.","authors":"Zoe Friedmann, Annette Binder, Hans-Tilmann Kinkel, Claudia Kühner, Andreas Zsolnai, Inge Mick","doi":"10.1159/000535416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Injectable opioid agonist treatment (iOAT) with diacetylmorphine is an effective option for individuals previously considered non-responsive to opioid substitution treatment. Despite implementation in Canada and several European countries, relatively few eligible people choose to initiate iOAT. To better understand what encourages or deters prospective patients from initiating iOAT, the current study explores patients' perceptions on iOAT and how these influence therapy initiation in practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted 34 semi-structured interviews with individuals currently in or eligible for iOAT in two German outpatient iOAT clinics. Transcripts were analysed following qualitative content analysis, with development of inductive categories and use of consensual coding. For member checking, we consulted individuals with lived experiences prior to data collection and publication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants based their choice to initiate iOAT on the perceived implications of the treatment on one's daily life and individual recovery. Participants were encouraged to initiate iOAT due to the therapy's perceived potential in reducing cravings and substance use, its positive health consequences, and due to the image of iOAT as a path towards abstinence. Regarding deterring perceptions, participants feared a profound impairment of daily life due to factors such as the daily visits to the clinic, were concerned about whether iOAT would sufficiently promote or even impede one's recovery, and described negative health effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Perceptions found in this study profoundly influenced participants' decisions on iOAT enrolment and contextualize the previous literature. The study reveals the dynamic coexistence of different perceptions about iOAT and sheds light on the inner-group stigmatization of iOAT. Practitioners and future research should acknowledge the complexities found in the current study in order to exploit the full potential of effective treatment modalities such as iOAT.</p>","PeriodicalId":11902,"journal":{"name":"European Addiction Research","volume":" ","pages":"32-42"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10836922/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Addiction Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000535416","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Injectable opioid agonist treatment (iOAT) with diacetylmorphine is an effective option for individuals previously considered non-responsive to opioid substitution treatment. Despite implementation in Canada and several European countries, relatively few eligible people choose to initiate iOAT. To better understand what encourages or deters prospective patients from initiating iOAT, the current study explores patients' perceptions on iOAT and how these influence therapy initiation in practice.

Methods: We conducted 34 semi-structured interviews with individuals currently in or eligible for iOAT in two German outpatient iOAT clinics. Transcripts were analysed following qualitative content analysis, with development of inductive categories and use of consensual coding. For member checking, we consulted individuals with lived experiences prior to data collection and publication.

Results: Participants based their choice to initiate iOAT on the perceived implications of the treatment on one's daily life and individual recovery. Participants were encouraged to initiate iOAT due to the therapy's perceived potential in reducing cravings and substance use, its positive health consequences, and due to the image of iOAT as a path towards abstinence. Regarding deterring perceptions, participants feared a profound impairment of daily life due to factors such as the daily visits to the clinic, were concerned about whether iOAT would sufficiently promote or even impede one's recovery, and described negative health effects.

Conclusion: Perceptions found in this study profoundly influenced participants' decisions on iOAT enrolment and contextualize the previous literature. The study reveals the dynamic coexistence of different perceptions about iOAT and sheds light on the inner-group stigmatization of iOAT. Practitioners and future research should acknowledge the complexities found in the current study in order to exploit the full potential of effective treatment modalities such as iOAT.

探索患者对注射阿片类激动剂治疗的看法:对开始治疗的影响及对实践的启示。
简介:使用二乙酰吗啡进行阿片类激动剂注射治疗(iOAT),对于以前被认为对阿片类药物替代治疗无反应的人来说,是一种有效的选择。尽管加拿大和一些欧洲国家已经实施了这种治疗方法,但选择开始 iOAT 治疗的符合条件者相对较少。为了更好地了解是什么鼓励或阻止了潜在患者开始 iOAT 治疗,本研究探讨了患者对 iOAT 的看法以及这些看法如何在实践中影响治疗的开始:我们在两家德国 iOAT 门诊诊所对目前正在接受或有资格接受 iOAT 治疗的患者进行了 34 次半结构式访谈。我们对访谈记录进行了定性内容分析,并进行了归纳分类和共识编码。在数据收集和发表之前,我们咨询了有生活经验的人士,以进行成员核对:结果:参与者选择开始 iOAT 的依据是治疗对日常生活和个人康复的影响。我们鼓励参与者开始 iOAT 治疗,因为我们认为这种疗法具有减少渴求和药物使用的潜力,对健康有积极的影响,而且 iOAT 被认为是实现戒毒的途径。关于阻碍性认知,参与者担心每天去诊所等因素会严重影响日常生活,担心 iOAT 是否能充分促进甚至阻碍个人康复,并描述了对健康的负面影响:本研究中发现的观念深刻影响了参与者关于加入 iOAT 的决定,并与之前的文献相吻合。研究揭示了对 iOAT 的不同看法的动态共存,并揭示了 iOAT 在群体内部的污名化。从业人员和未来的研究应认识到当前研究中发现的复杂性,以充分挖掘 iOAT 等有效治疗模式的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Addiction Research
European Addiction Research SUBSTANCE ABUSE-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.10%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''European Addiction Research'' is a unique international scientific journal for the rapid publication of innovative research covering all aspects of addiction and related disorders. Representing an interdisciplinary forum for the exchange of recent data and expert opinion, it reflects the importance of a comprehensive approach to resolve the problems of substance abuse and addiction in Europe. Coverage ranges from clinical and research advances in the fields of psychiatry, biology, pharmacology and epidemiology to social, and legal implications of policy decisions. The goal is to facilitate open discussion among those interested in the scientific and clinical aspects of prevention, diagnosis and therapy as well as dealing with legal issues. An excellent range of original papers makes ‘European Addiction Research’ the forum of choice for all.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信