{"title":"Effect of Nutritional Intervention on Energy Intake in Head and Neck Cancer Patients After Radiotherapy.","authors":"Yuanyuan Li, Yingtao Meng, Zengfen Pang, Jing Huai, Suisui Yi, Ronghua Kong","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to analyze the impact of nutritional intervention during radiotherapy for head and neck tumors and its effects on energy intake, consumption, and nutritional status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comparative or observational study was conducted, and a total of 103 head and neck tumor patients undergoing radiotherapy were selected for this study and divided into two groups. The control group (n = 51) received routine nursing intervention, while the observation group (n = 52) received additional nutritional intervention. We compared the nutritional status, energy intake and consumption, and emotional well-being between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the intervention, the observation group exhibited significantly higher levels of BMI, serum prealbumin, hemoglobin, and albumin compared to the control group (P < .05). Energy intake during radiotherapy was significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group. Furthermore, the energy consumption in the observation group was significantly lower than in the control group (P < .05). After the intervention, the observation group reported lower scores on the Self-rating Anxiety Scale and Self-rating Depression Scale compared to the control group (P < .05). In a three-month follow-up after radiotherapy, the observation group's EORTC Cancer Quality of Life Scale score was also significantly higher than that of the control group (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nutritional intervention proved effective in increasing energy intake and reducing energy consumption in patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck tumors. This improvement positively impacted the nutritional status and quality of life of the patients, emphasizing its significant research value.</p>","PeriodicalId":7571,"journal":{"name":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to analyze the impact of nutritional intervention during radiotherapy for head and neck tumors and its effects on energy intake, consumption, and nutritional status.
Methods: A comparative or observational study was conducted, and a total of 103 head and neck tumor patients undergoing radiotherapy were selected for this study and divided into two groups. The control group (n = 51) received routine nursing intervention, while the observation group (n = 52) received additional nutritional intervention. We compared the nutritional status, energy intake and consumption, and emotional well-being between the two groups.
Results: After the intervention, the observation group exhibited significantly higher levels of BMI, serum prealbumin, hemoglobin, and albumin compared to the control group (P < .05). Energy intake during radiotherapy was significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group. Furthermore, the energy consumption in the observation group was significantly lower than in the control group (P < .05). After the intervention, the observation group reported lower scores on the Self-rating Anxiety Scale and Self-rating Depression Scale compared to the control group (P < .05). In a three-month follow-up after radiotherapy, the observation group's EORTC Cancer Quality of Life Scale score was also significantly higher than that of the control group (P < .05).
Conclusions: Nutritional intervention proved effective in increasing energy intake and reducing energy consumption in patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck tumors. This improvement positively impacted the nutritional status and quality of life of the patients, emphasizing its significant research value.
期刊介绍:
Launched in 1995, Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine has a mission to promote the art and science of integrative medicine and a responsibility to improve public health. We strive to maintain the highest standards of ethical medical journalism independent of special interests that is timely, accurate, and a pleasure to read. We publish original, peer-reviewed scientific articles that provide health care providers with continuing education to promote health, prevent illness, and treat disease. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine was the first journal in this field to be indexed in the National Library of Medicine. In 2006, 2007, and 2008, ATHM had the highest impact factor ranking of any independently published peer-reviewed CAM journal in the United States—meaning that its research articles were cited more frequently than any other journal’s in the field.
Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine does not endorse any particular system or method but promotes the evaluation and appropriate use of all effective therapeutic approaches. Each issue contains a variety of disciplined inquiry methods, from case reports to original scientific research to systematic reviews. The editors encourage the integration of evidence-based emerging therapies with conventional medical practices by licensed health care providers in a way that promotes a comprehensive approach to health care that is focused on wellness, prevention, and healing. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine hopes to inform all licensed health care practitioners about developments in fields other than their own and to foster an ongoing debate about the scientific, clinical, historical, legal, political, and cultural issues that affect all of health care.