Clinical effects of Special Pressure Ulcer Intervention Combined with Gel Positioning Pad Intervention on Preventing Acute Stress Injury in Patients Undergoing Long-Term Lateral Position Spinal Surgery.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-08-01
Qian Gu, Qian Liu, Xia Wang, Yuanyuan Xia, Jinting Hu
{"title":"Clinical effects of Special Pressure Ulcer Intervention Combined with Gel Positioning Pad Intervention on Preventing Acute Stress Injury in Patients Undergoing Long-Term Lateral Position Spinal Surgery.","authors":"Qian Gu, Qian Liu, Xia Wang, Yuanyuan Xia, Jinting Hu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Prevention of acute pressure injuries (PS) is critical in patients undergoing certain surgeries. This type of pressure injury can develop during and after surgery, causing unnecessary pain and complications for the patient. However, preventing PS in these high-risk patients may present some challenges and require specific nursing measures. To explore the clinical effects of special pressure ulcer intervention combined with gel positioning pad intervention on the prevention of acute stress injury in patients undergoing long-term lateral position spinal surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The simple randomization method was used in this study; 100 patients with lateral position spinal surgery from March 2022 to March 2023 were selected as research subjects and were divided into an observation group and control group with 50 cases in each group by the random number table method. The control group was given routine intervention, and the observation group carried out special pressure ulcer intervention and gel positioning pad intervention. Special pressure ulcer intervention was performed, using appropriate surface support to relieve pressure, keeping the patient's skin clean and dry, and turning regularly to relieve pressure. In addition, we use a gel positioning pad intervention to disperse pressure, improve local blood circulation, and reduce the risk of pressure injuries. The occurrence of acute stress injury, VAS scores at different time points after surgery, local skin infrared thermography analysis results at 72 hours after surgery, incidence rates of complications and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups of patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence rates of acute stress injury during surgery, within 2 hours after surgery and within 72 hours after surgery in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P < .0046). The number and area of injury in the observation group were smaller than those in the control group (P < .0037). The National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) grading of acute stress injury in the observation group was lower compared with that in the control group (P < .0021). The pain VAS scores in the observation group at 2 hours, 24 hours and 72 hours after surgery were lower than those in the control group (P < .001). The local skin infrared thermography analysis temperature values of the neck, shoulder, hip, knee and ankle were lower in the observation group than those in the control group at 72 hours after surgery (P < .001). The incidence rates of postoperative lumbago and shoulder-neck pain in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P < .001). The scores of three aspects of nursing technology and nursing operation satisfaction, service attitude and humanistic care satisfaction, and nursing environment satisfaction were higher in the observation group than compared to the control group (P < .001). The findings of this study highlight the importance of specific pressure ulcer interventions that can be widely used in clinical practice and have the potential to reduce the incidence of pressure injuries and improve patient satisfaction with care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Special pressure ulcer intervention combined with gel positioning pad intervention has a good preventive effect on acute stress injury in patients undergoing long-term lateral position spinal surgery. Limitations of this study include the small sample size and single study institution, which may affect the external validity of the study. In addition, data collection in this study was limited to a specific time period and does not reflect long-term outcomes. Future studies could consider multi-center, broader samples, and longer follow-up to confirm the benefits of these interventions and to investigate in depth the long-term rehabilitation and quality of life of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Prevention of acute pressure injuries (PS) is critical in patients undergoing certain surgeries. This type of pressure injury can develop during and after surgery, causing unnecessary pain and complications for the patient. However, preventing PS in these high-risk patients may present some challenges and require specific nursing measures. To explore the clinical effects of special pressure ulcer intervention combined with gel positioning pad intervention on the prevention of acute stress injury in patients undergoing long-term lateral position spinal surgery.

Methods: The simple randomization method was used in this study; 100 patients with lateral position spinal surgery from March 2022 to March 2023 were selected as research subjects and were divided into an observation group and control group with 50 cases in each group by the random number table method. The control group was given routine intervention, and the observation group carried out special pressure ulcer intervention and gel positioning pad intervention. Special pressure ulcer intervention was performed, using appropriate surface support to relieve pressure, keeping the patient's skin clean and dry, and turning regularly to relieve pressure. In addition, we use a gel positioning pad intervention to disperse pressure, improve local blood circulation, and reduce the risk of pressure injuries. The occurrence of acute stress injury, VAS scores at different time points after surgery, local skin infrared thermography analysis results at 72 hours after surgery, incidence rates of complications and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups of patients.

Results: The incidence rates of acute stress injury during surgery, within 2 hours after surgery and within 72 hours after surgery in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P < .0046). The number and area of injury in the observation group were smaller than those in the control group (P < .0037). The National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) grading of acute stress injury in the observation group was lower compared with that in the control group (P < .0021). The pain VAS scores in the observation group at 2 hours, 24 hours and 72 hours after surgery were lower than those in the control group (P < .001). The local skin infrared thermography analysis temperature values of the neck, shoulder, hip, knee and ankle were lower in the observation group than those in the control group at 72 hours after surgery (P < .001). The incidence rates of postoperative lumbago and shoulder-neck pain in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P < .001). The scores of three aspects of nursing technology and nursing operation satisfaction, service attitude and humanistic care satisfaction, and nursing environment satisfaction were higher in the observation group than compared to the control group (P < .001). The findings of this study highlight the importance of specific pressure ulcer interventions that can be widely used in clinical practice and have the potential to reduce the incidence of pressure injuries and improve patient satisfaction with care.

Conclusion: Special pressure ulcer intervention combined with gel positioning pad intervention has a good preventive effect on acute stress injury in patients undergoing long-term lateral position spinal surgery. Limitations of this study include the small sample size and single study institution, which may affect the external validity of the study. In addition, data collection in this study was limited to a specific time period and does not reflect long-term outcomes. Future studies could consider multi-center, broader samples, and longer follow-up to confirm the benefits of these interventions and to investigate in depth the long-term rehabilitation and quality of life of patients.

特殊压疮干预与凝胶定位垫干预相结合对预防长期侧位脊柱手术患者急性应激损伤的临床效果。
目的:对于接受某些手术的病人来说,预防急性压伤(PS)至关重要。这类压伤可能在手术中和手术后发生,给病人带来不必要的痛苦和并发症。然而,预防这类高危患者的压伤可能会面临一些挑战,需要采取特殊的护理措施。目的:探讨特殊压疮干预联合凝胶定位垫干预对长期侧位脊柱手术患者预防急性压力性损伤的临床效果:本次研究采用简单随机法,选取2022年3月-2023年3月期间100例脊柱侧位手术患者作为研究对象,通过随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,每组50例。对照组给予常规干预,观察组进行特殊压疮干预和凝胶定位垫干预。观察组进行特殊压疮干预,使用适当的表面支撑减轻压力,保持患者皮肤清洁干燥,定期翻身减轻压力。此外,我们还使用凝胶定位垫干预,分散压力,改善局部血液循环,降低压力性损伤的风险。比较两组患者术中急性应激损伤发生率、术后不同时间点VAS评分、术后72小时局部皮肤红外热成像分析结果、并发症发生率及护理满意度:结果:观察组患者术中、术后 2 小时内和术后 72 小时内急性应激损伤的发生率均低于对照组(P < .0046)。观察组的损伤数量和面积均小于对照组(P < .0037)。与对照组相比,观察组的国家压力溃疡顾问团(NPUAP)急性应激损伤分级更低(P < .0021)。观察组术后 2 小时、24 小时和 72 小时的疼痛 VAS 评分均低于对照组(P < .001)。术后 72 小时,观察组颈部、肩部、髋部、膝部和踝部的局部皮肤红外热成像分析温度值低于对照组(P < .001)。观察组术后腰痛和肩颈痛的发生率低于对照组(P < .001)。观察组在护理技术与护理操作满意度、服务态度与人文关怀满意度、护理环境满意度三个方面的评分均高于对照组(P < .001)。本研究结果强调了特殊压疮干预措施的重要性,这些措施可广泛应用于临床实践,并有可能降低压伤发生率,提高患者对护理工作的满意度:结论:特殊压疮干预结合凝胶定位垫干预对长期侧卧位脊柱手术患者的急性压力性损伤具有良好的预防效果。本研究的局限性包括样本量较小且研究机构单一,这可能会影响研究的外部有效性。此外,本研究的数据收集仅限于特定时间段,不能反映长期结果。未来的研究可以考虑多中心、更广泛的样本和更长时间的随访,以确认这些干预措施的益处,并深入调查患者的长期康复情况和生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信