Predicting Fractures Using Vertebral 18F-NaF Uptake in Prostate Cancer Patients.

Q2 Medicine
Journal of Bone Metabolism Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-30 DOI:10.11005/jbm.2023.30.4.329
Helene Chesnais, Nikita Bastin, Sofia Miguez, Daniel Kargilis, Anita Kalluri, Ashley Terry, Chamith S Rajapakse
{"title":"Predicting Fractures Using Vertebral 18F-NaF Uptake in Prostate Cancer Patients.","authors":"Helene Chesnais, Nikita Bastin, Sofia Miguez, Daniel Kargilis, Anita Kalluri, Ashley Terry, Chamith S Rajapakse","doi":"10.11005/jbm.2023.30.4.329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with prostate cancer tend to be at heightened risk for fracture due to bone metastases and treatment with androgen-deprivation therapy. Bone mineral density (BMD) derived from dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the standard for determining fracture risk in this population. However, BMD often fails to predict many osteoporotic fractures. Patients with prostate cancer also undergo 18F-sodium fluoride (18F-NaF)-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) to monitor metastases. The purpose of this study was to assess whether bone deposition, assessed by 18F-NaF uptake in 18F-NaF PET/CT, could predict incident fractures better than DXA- or CT-derived BMD in patients with prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 105 males with prostate cancer who had undergone full body 18F-NaF PET/CT. Standardized uptake value (SUVmean and SUVmax) and CT-derived Hounsfield units (HU), a correlate of BMD, were recorded for each vertebral body. The average SUVmean, SUVmax, and HU were calculated for cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and sacral areas. The t-test was used to assess significant differences between fracture and no-fracture groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SUVmean and SUVmax values for the thoracic area were lower in the fracture group than in the no-fracture group. There was no significant difference in cervical, thoracic, lumbar or sacral HU between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study reports that lower PET-derived non-metastatic bone deposition in the thoracic spine is correlated with incidence of fractures in patients with prostate cancer. CT-derived HU, a correlate of DXA-derived BMD, was not predictive of fracture risk. 18F-NaF PET/CT may provide important insight into bone quality and fracture risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":15070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone Metabolism","volume":"30 4","pages":"329-337"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10721380/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11005/jbm.2023.30.4.329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with prostate cancer tend to be at heightened risk for fracture due to bone metastases and treatment with androgen-deprivation therapy. Bone mineral density (BMD) derived from dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the standard for determining fracture risk in this population. However, BMD often fails to predict many osteoporotic fractures. Patients with prostate cancer also undergo 18F-sodium fluoride (18F-NaF)-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) to monitor metastases. The purpose of this study was to assess whether bone deposition, assessed by 18F-NaF uptake in 18F-NaF PET/CT, could predict incident fractures better than DXA- or CT-derived BMD in patients with prostate cancer.

Methods: This study included 105 males with prostate cancer who had undergone full body 18F-NaF PET/CT. Standardized uptake value (SUVmean and SUVmax) and CT-derived Hounsfield units (HU), a correlate of BMD, were recorded for each vertebral body. The average SUVmean, SUVmax, and HU were calculated for cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and sacral areas. The t-test was used to assess significant differences between fracture and no-fracture groups.

Results: The SUVmean and SUVmax values for the thoracic area were lower in the fracture group than in the no-fracture group. There was no significant difference in cervical, thoracic, lumbar or sacral HU between the 2 groups.

Conclusions: Our study reports that lower PET-derived non-metastatic bone deposition in the thoracic spine is correlated with incidence of fractures in patients with prostate cancer. CT-derived HU, a correlate of DXA-derived BMD, was not predictive of fracture risk. 18F-NaF PET/CT may provide important insight into bone quality and fracture risk.

利用前列腺癌患者椎体 18F-NaF 摄取预测骨折情况
背景:由于骨转移和雄激素剥夺疗法,前列腺癌患者的骨折风险往往较高。双能 X 射线吸收测定法(DXA)得出的骨密度(BMD)是确定这类人群骨折风险的标准。然而,BMD 通常无法预测许多骨质疏松性骨折。前列腺癌患者还需接受 18F- 氟化钠(18F-NaF)正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)以监测转移情况。本研究的目的是评估通过 18F-NaF PET/CT 中的 18F-NaF 摄取评估的骨沉积是否能比 DXA 或 CT 导出的 BMD 更好地预测前列腺癌患者发生骨折的情况:这项研究包括 105 名接受全身 18F-NaF PET/CT 检查的男性前列腺癌患者。记录了每个椎体的标准化摄取值(SUVmean 和 SUVmax)以及与 BMD 相关的 CT 导出 Hounsfield 单位(HU)。计算了颈椎、胸椎、腰椎和骶椎区域的平均 SUVmean、SUVmax 和 HU。采用 t 检验评估骨折组和未骨折组之间的显著差异:结果:骨折组胸椎区域的 SUVmean 值和 SUVmax 值均低于无骨折组。两组间颈椎、胸椎、腰椎或骶椎的 HU 无明显差异:我们的研究报告表明,胸椎较低的 PET 衍生非转移性骨沉积与前列腺癌患者的骨折发生率相关。CT 导出的 HU(DXA 导出的 BMD 的相关指标)不能预测骨折风险。18F-NaF PET/CT 可提供有关骨质和骨折风险的重要信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Bone Metabolism
Journal of Bone Metabolism Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信