Postoperative therapy for local-advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Zhuo Wang, Lihua Dong, Weiyan Shi, Ling Gao, Xin Jiang, Suyang Xue, Pengyu Chang
{"title":"Postoperative therapy for local-advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Zhuo Wang, Lihua Dong, Weiyan Shi, Ling Gao, Xin Jiang, Suyang Xue, Pengyu Chang","doi":"10.17219/acem/171616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adjuvant therapy after surgery is effective for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (GC), but the regimens are not uniform, resulting in imbalanced benefits.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of patients with local-advanced GC (LAGC) after surgery plus adjuvant therapy and with surgery alone based on meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Literature search was performed among the articles published in the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases from January 2000 to December 2018. Study selection was conducted based on the following criteria: randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on surgery plus adjuvant therapy compared to surgery alone; studies compared OS and/or RFS/DFS; and cases medically confirmed with LAGC. Only articles in English were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 datasets from 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 4606 patients were included in the meta-analysis. There was a significant improvement in OS of patients who underwent postoperative adjuvant therapy (HR 0.78; 95% CI: 0.72-0.84; p < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, it showed a higher improvement in OS patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy plus immunotherapy or radiotherapy (HR 0.72; 95% CI: 0.61-0.85; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adjuvant therapy led to survival benefits in patients with LAGC.</p>","PeriodicalId":7306,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"669-678"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/171616","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adjuvant therapy after surgery is effective for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (GC), but the regimens are not uniform, resulting in imbalanced benefits.

Objectives: To compare the overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of patients with local-advanced GC (LAGC) after surgery plus adjuvant therapy and with surgery alone based on meta-analysis.

Material and methods: Literature search was performed among the articles published in the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases from January 2000 to December 2018. Study selection was conducted based on the following criteria: randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on surgery plus adjuvant therapy compared to surgery alone; studies compared OS and/or RFS/DFS; and cases medically confirmed with LAGC. Only articles in English were included.

Results: A total of 12 datasets from 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 4606 patients were included in the meta-analysis. There was a significant improvement in OS of patients who underwent postoperative adjuvant therapy (HR 0.78; 95% CI: 0.72-0.84; p < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, it showed a higher improvement in OS patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy plus immunotherapy or radiotherapy (HR 0.72; 95% CI: 0.61-0.85; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Adjuvant therapy led to survival benefits in patients with LAGC.

局部晚期胃癌的术后治疗:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:手术后辅助治疗对晚期胃癌(GC)治疗有效,但治疗方案不统一,导致疗效不平衡:手术后辅助治疗对晚期胃癌(GC)的治疗有效,但治疗方案不统一,导致疗效不平衡:基于荟萃分析比较局部晚期胃癌(LAGC)患者手术加辅助治疗与单纯手术治疗后的总生存期(OS)、无复发生存期(RFS)和无病生存期(DFS):在2000年1月至2018年12月期间发表于PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库的文章中进行文献检索。研究选择基于以下标准:手术加辅助治疗与单纯手术相比的随机临床试验(RCT);比较OS和/或RFS/DFS的研究;经医学证实为LAGC的病例。仅纳入英文文章:荟萃分析共纳入了来自11项随机对照试验(RCT)的12个数据集,涉及4606名患者。接受术后辅助治疗的患者的OS明显改善(HR 0.78; 95% CI: 0.72-0.84; p < 0.001)。在亚组分析中,接受辅助化疗加免疫治疗或放疗的患者的OS改善程度更高(HR 0.72;95% CI:0.61-0.85;P <0.001):结论:辅助治疗可提高LAGC患者的生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been published by the Wroclaw Medical University since 1992. Establishing the medical journal was the idea of Prof. Bogumił Halawa, Chair of the Department of Cardiology, and was fully supported by the Rector of Wroclaw Medical University, Prof. Zbigniew Knapik. Prof. Halawa was also the first editor-in-chief, between 1992-1997. The journal, then entitled "Postępy Medycyny Klinicznej i Doświadczalnej", appeared quarterly. Prof. Leszek Paradowski was editor-in-chief from 1997-1999. In 1998 he initiated alterations in the profile and cover design of the journal which were accepted by the Editorial Board. The title was changed to Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine. Articles in English were welcomed. A number of outstanding representatives of medical science from Poland and abroad were invited to participate in the newly established International Editorial Staff. Prof. Antonina Harłozińska-Szmyrka was editor-in-chief in years 2000-2005, in years 2006-2007 once again prof. Leszek Paradowski and prof. Maria Podolak-Dawidziak was editor-in-chief in years 2008-2016. Since 2017 the editor-in chief is prof. Maciej Bagłaj. Since July 2005, original papers have been published only in English. Case reports are no longer accepted. The manuscripts are reviewed by two independent reviewers and a statistical reviewer, and English texts are proofread by a native speaker. The journal has been indexed in several databases: Scopus, Ulrich’sTM International Periodicals Directory, Index Copernicus and since 2007 in Thomson Reuters databases: Science Citation Index Expanded i Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition. In 2010 the journal obtained Impact Factor which is now 1.179 pts. Articles published in the journal are worth 15 points among Polish journals according to the Polish Committee for Scientific Research and 169.43 points according to the Index Copernicus. Since November 7, 2012, Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been indexed and included in National Library of Medicine’s MEDLINE database. English abstracts printed in the journal are included and searchable using PubMed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信