Techno-Economic Comparison of Simple and Cascade Organic Rankine Cycle for Distributed Energy

IF 0.9 Q4 ENERGY & FUELS
O. J. Eyenubo, S. O. Otuagoma, K. Owebor, N. U. Enyinnaya, D. O. Ofotoku
{"title":"Techno-Economic Comparison of Simple and Cascade Organic Rankine Cycle for Distributed Energy","authors":"O. J. Eyenubo,&nbsp;S. O. Otuagoma,&nbsp;K. Owebor,&nbsp;N. U. Enyinnaya,&nbsp;D. O. Ofotoku","doi":"10.1134/S0040601523120042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this paper, two power plant configurations for distributed energy, simple and cascaded Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC), were proposed, modeled, analyzed and compared from a technical and economic point of view. It is proposed to use rice husks from a typical mill in Nigeria as fuel for the operation of the power plant, while the working fluids for the studied ORC plants are toluene and R245fa refrigerants. Power plants are modeled on the basis of fundamental technical and economic approaches. At the same time, power generation, as well as energy and exergy efficiency were selected as key technical parameters for the study. The desired economic parameter determines the cost of a unit of energy. It has been established that with proper use of rice husks as a renewable energy source, the energy generated by the ORC power plant can help to meet 27–38 MWh daily needs of the rice factory and its surroundings. The results of the analysis of the energy and exergy efficiency of a simple and cascade ORC power plant as presented indicates a better prospect for the latter. The working/thermal capacities of the plant elements and the loss of exergy in them are analyzed. The directions of increasing the efficiency of the rice husk power plant have been identified, primarily by improving high-temperature heat exchangers. The results of an economic analysis of the viability of the simple and cascade ORC power plants are presented. A simple ORC demonstrates the best economic performance with a unit energy cost of $0.115 per kWh compared to $0.124 per kWh of a cascade ORC. However, a holistic study of technical, economic, social and environmental indicators creates prerequisites for the research and development of a cascade ORC installation. The paper also presents the results of an analysis of the sensitivity of plant performance on the volume of annual production of rice husks, the temperature of the exhaust gases at the outlet of the chimney and the coefficient of the import tariff. A feasibility study of the prospects of the proposed technical solution for poorly electrified countries is presented.</p>","PeriodicalId":799,"journal":{"name":"Thermal Engineering","volume":"70 12","pages":"1073 - 1082"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thermal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0040601523120042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, two power plant configurations for distributed energy, simple and cascaded Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC), were proposed, modeled, analyzed and compared from a technical and economic point of view. It is proposed to use rice husks from a typical mill in Nigeria as fuel for the operation of the power plant, while the working fluids for the studied ORC plants are toluene and R245fa refrigerants. Power plants are modeled on the basis of fundamental technical and economic approaches. At the same time, power generation, as well as energy and exergy efficiency were selected as key technical parameters for the study. The desired economic parameter determines the cost of a unit of energy. It has been established that with proper use of rice husks as a renewable energy source, the energy generated by the ORC power plant can help to meet 27–38 MWh daily needs of the rice factory and its surroundings. The results of the analysis of the energy and exergy efficiency of a simple and cascade ORC power plant as presented indicates a better prospect for the latter. The working/thermal capacities of the plant elements and the loss of exergy in them are analyzed. The directions of increasing the efficiency of the rice husk power plant have been identified, primarily by improving high-temperature heat exchangers. The results of an economic analysis of the viability of the simple and cascade ORC power plants are presented. A simple ORC demonstrates the best economic performance with a unit energy cost of $0.115 per kWh compared to $0.124 per kWh of a cascade ORC. However, a holistic study of technical, economic, social and environmental indicators creates prerequisites for the research and development of a cascade ORC installation. The paper also presents the results of an analysis of the sensitivity of plant performance on the volume of annual production of rice husks, the temperature of the exhaust gases at the outlet of the chimney and the coefficient of the import tariff. A feasibility study of the prospects of the proposed technical solution for poorly electrified countries is presented.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

用于分布式能源的简单有机郎肯循环和级联有机郎肯循环的技术经济比较
摘要 本文从技术和经济角度提出了两种分布式能源发电厂配置,即简单和级联有机郎肯循环(ORC),并对其进行了建模、分析和比较。建议使用尼日利亚一家典型磨坊的稻壳作为发电厂运行的燃料,而所研究的有机郎肯循环发电厂的工作流体为甲苯和 R245fa 制冷剂。发电厂的建模基于基本的技术和经济方法。同时,发电量以及能量和放能效率被选为研究的关键技术参数。所需的经济参数决定了单位能源的成本。研究结果表明,在适当利用稻壳这种可再生能源的情况下,ORC 发电站产生的能量可满足米厂及其周边地区每天 27-38 兆瓦时的需求。对简单 ORC 发电站和级联 ORC 发电站的能源效率和放能效率的分析结果表明,后者的前景更好。分析了电站元件的工作/热容量以及其中的放能损失。确定了提高稻壳发电厂效率的方向,主要是通过改进高温热交换器。对简单 ORC 发电站和级联 ORC 发电站的可行性进行了经济分析。简单 ORC 的经济效益最佳,单位能源成本为每千瓦时 0.115 美元,而级联 ORC 的单位能源成本为每千瓦时 0.124 美元。然而,对技术、经济、社会和环境指标的全面研究为研究和开发级联 ORC 装置创造了先决条件。本文还介绍了工厂性能对稻壳年产量、烟囱出口废气温度和进口关税系数的敏感性分析结果。此外,还介绍了针对电气化程度较低的国家提出的技术解决方案的可行性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
94
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信