All Health Politics Is Local: Community Battles for Medical Care and Environmental Health by Merlin Chowkwanyun (review)

IF 0.9 2区 哲学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Beatrix Hoffman
{"title":"All Health Politics Is Local: Community Battles for Medical Care and Environmental Health by Merlin Chowkwanyun (review)","authors":"Beatrix Hoffman","doi":"10.1353/bhm.2023.a915278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>All Health Politics Is Local: Community Battles for Medical Care and Environmental Health</em> by Merlin Chowkwanyun <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Beatrix Hoffman </li> </ul> Merlin Chowkwanyun. <em>All Health Politics Is Local: Community Battles for Medical Care and Environmental Health</em>. Studies in Social Medicine. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2022. xii + 338 pp. Ill. $29.95 ( 978-1-4696-6767-6). <p>In 2019, General Iron, a polluting scrap metal company, began to relocate from Chicago's affluent Lincoln Park neighborhood to a poor Latinx community on the city's southeast side. Both the previous mayor, Rahm Emanuel, and the new one, Lori Lightfoot, encouraged the move. But after three years of protests by southeast side residents, including a monthlong hunger strike and a federal civil rights lawsuit, the city withdrew General Iron's permit.</p> <p>With both the Green New Deal and Medicare for All facing daunting political obstacles, this is an excellent time to pay closer attention to environmental and health care activism at the neighborhood level. Merlin Chowkwanyun's <em>All Health Politics Is Local: Community Battles for Medical Care and Environmental Health</em> provides the invigorating analysis we need to begin to assess the efficacy and possibilities of community action to defend the public's health. Taking as a starting <strong>[End Page 523]</strong> point Tip O'Neill's adage that \"all politics is local,\" Chowkwanyun argues that historians of U.S. health politics have synthesized national developments at the expense of variation at the grassroots. To address this deficiency, <em>All Health Politics Is Local</em> presents examples from New York, Los Angeles, Cleveland, and Central Appalachia \"to identify cross-cutting and common themes across places while preserving local uniqueness\" (p. 5). Utilizing this ingenious comparative structure, Chowkwanyun incisively evaluates six ground-level political battles around industrial pollution and medical care.</p> <p>While the case studies, which take place from the 1950s through the 1970s, are organized geographically, readers will also find it useful to read the themed chapters alongside each other. Four of the chapters are about community fights around hospital and clinic care, and two are about environmental health movements. In New York, neighborhood groups, health workers' unions, and medical organizations protested the city's strategy to shut down some of its public hospitals and affiliate the rest with academic medical centers. They won their demand for a new Gouverneur Hospital on the Lower East Side but lost the larger battle against affiliation, primarily due to the overwhelming fiscal pressures on cities in the 1970s. In Los Angeles, activists in the wake of the Watts uprising led a movement for a new public hospital. Here Chowkwanyun's comparative approach provides crucial insights, since the local context and timing of these battles strongly affected their outcomes. He shows that by the time Los Angeles opened the desperately needed Martin Luther King Jr. Hospital in 1972, California had begun its move toward \"a landscape of relentless scarcity\" (p. 134), leaving the new safety net hospital brutally starved of resources.</p> <p>In Cleveland, another city struggling with uprisings and urban renewal, austerity's erosion of hospital care for the poor was less pronounced, Chowkwanyun shows. The region's population loss due to deindustrialization eased the demand for health services, and a decision to place public hospitals and clinics under county rather than city auspices gave Cleveland's safety net institutions more reliable financial footing. But counties are not always positive actors. One of the book's most striking chapters describes how stark corruption reinforced medical inequality in Central Appalachia. In this severely underserved region, counties run by entrenched political machines used federal War on Poverty health dollars to enrich themselves and their cronies rather than improve people's access to care. In this story, the voices of community activists come through strongly as the book details how the Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization fought to hold local and federal officials accountable.</p> <p>Chowkwanyun's comparison of environmental health movements in Los Angeles and Central Appalachia is especially illuminating. In LA, activists fighting against smog won support from politicians and local businesses who saw cleaner air as serving their own interests. They also found scientific backing in studies showing the deleterious health effects of air pollution. But in Appalachia \"scientific...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":55304,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the History of Medicine","volume":"29 8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the History of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/bhm.2023.a915278","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reviewed by:

  • All Health Politics Is Local: Community Battles for Medical Care and Environmental Health by Merlin Chowkwanyun
  • Beatrix Hoffman
Merlin Chowkwanyun. All Health Politics Is Local: Community Battles for Medical Care and Environmental Health. Studies in Social Medicine. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2022. xii + 338 pp. Ill. $29.95 ( 978-1-4696-6767-6).

In 2019, General Iron, a polluting scrap metal company, began to relocate from Chicago's affluent Lincoln Park neighborhood to a poor Latinx community on the city's southeast side. Both the previous mayor, Rahm Emanuel, and the new one, Lori Lightfoot, encouraged the move. But after three years of protests by southeast side residents, including a monthlong hunger strike and a federal civil rights lawsuit, the city withdrew General Iron's permit.

With both the Green New Deal and Medicare for All facing daunting political obstacles, this is an excellent time to pay closer attention to environmental and health care activism at the neighborhood level. Merlin Chowkwanyun's All Health Politics Is Local: Community Battles for Medical Care and Environmental Health provides the invigorating analysis we need to begin to assess the efficacy and possibilities of community action to defend the public's health. Taking as a starting [End Page 523] point Tip O'Neill's adage that "all politics is local," Chowkwanyun argues that historians of U.S. health politics have synthesized national developments at the expense of variation at the grassroots. To address this deficiency, All Health Politics Is Local presents examples from New York, Los Angeles, Cleveland, and Central Appalachia "to identify cross-cutting and common themes across places while preserving local uniqueness" (p. 5). Utilizing this ingenious comparative structure, Chowkwanyun incisively evaluates six ground-level political battles around industrial pollution and medical care.

While the case studies, which take place from the 1950s through the 1970s, are organized geographically, readers will also find it useful to read the themed chapters alongside each other. Four of the chapters are about community fights around hospital and clinic care, and two are about environmental health movements. In New York, neighborhood groups, health workers' unions, and medical organizations protested the city's strategy to shut down some of its public hospitals and affiliate the rest with academic medical centers. They won their demand for a new Gouverneur Hospital on the Lower East Side but lost the larger battle against affiliation, primarily due to the overwhelming fiscal pressures on cities in the 1970s. In Los Angeles, activists in the wake of the Watts uprising led a movement for a new public hospital. Here Chowkwanyun's comparative approach provides crucial insights, since the local context and timing of these battles strongly affected their outcomes. He shows that by the time Los Angeles opened the desperately needed Martin Luther King Jr. Hospital in 1972, California had begun its move toward "a landscape of relentless scarcity" (p. 134), leaving the new safety net hospital brutally starved of resources.

In Cleveland, another city struggling with uprisings and urban renewal, austerity's erosion of hospital care for the poor was less pronounced, Chowkwanyun shows. The region's population loss due to deindustrialization eased the demand for health services, and a decision to place public hospitals and clinics under county rather than city auspices gave Cleveland's safety net institutions more reliable financial footing. But counties are not always positive actors. One of the book's most striking chapters describes how stark corruption reinforced medical inequality in Central Appalachia. In this severely underserved region, counties run by entrenched political machines used federal War on Poverty health dollars to enrich themselves and their cronies rather than improve people's access to care. In this story, the voices of community activists come through strongly as the book details how the Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization fought to hold local and federal officials accountable.

Chowkwanyun's comparison of environmental health movements in Los Angeles and Central Appalachia is especially illuminating. In LA, activists fighting against smog won support from politicians and local businesses who saw cleaner air as serving their own interests. They also found scientific backing in studies showing the deleterious health effects of air pollution. But in Appalachia "scientific...

所有的卫生政治都是地方性的:Merlin Chowkwanyun 著的《医疗和环境健康的社区斗争》(评论)
评论者: 所有的健康政治都是地方性的:Merlin Chowkwanyun Beatrix Hoffman Merlin Chowkwanyun 著。所有的健康政治都是地方性的:社会医学研究》。社会医学研究》。教堂山:北卡罗来纳大学出版社,2022 年。xii + 338 pp.插图,29.95 美元(978-1-4696-6767-6)。2019 年,一家造成污染的废金属公司 General Iron 开始从芝加哥富裕的林肯公园社区搬迁到该市东南部的一个贫穷的拉丁裔社区。前任市长拉姆-伊曼纽尔(Rahm Emanuel)和新任市长洛瑞-莱特福特(Lori Lightfoot)都鼓励搬迁。但经过东南区居民长达三年的抗议,包括长达一个月的绝食抗议和联邦民权诉讼,市政府收回了铁将军公司的许可证。由于绿色新政和全民医疗保险都面临着巨大的政治障碍,现在正是密切关注社区层面的环保和医疗活动的大好时机。Merlin Chowkwanyun 的《所有健康政治都是地方性的》(All Health Politics Is Local:为医疗保健和环境健康而进行的社区斗争》一书提供了令人振奋的分析,我们需要开始评估社区行动的有效性和可能性,以捍卫公众的健康。以蒂普-奥尼尔(Tip O'Neill)的格言 "所有的政治都是地方性的 "为出发点,Chowkwanyun 认为,美国卫生政治史学家综合了全国性的发展,而忽略了基层的变化。为了弥补这一不足,《所有的卫生政治都是地方性的》介绍了纽约、洛杉矶、克利夫兰和阿巴拉契亚中部的例子,"以确定各地交叉和共同的主题,同时保留地方的独特性"(第 5 页)。利用这种巧妙的比较结构,Chowkwanyun 精辟地评估了围绕工业污染和医疗保健的六场地面政治斗争。虽然这些案例研究发生在 20 世纪 50 年代到 70 年代,是按地域组织的,但读者也会发现,将各主题章节放在一起阅读会很有帮助。其中四章是关于围绕医院和诊所护理的社区斗争,两章是关于环境健康运动。在纽约,邻里团体、医务工作者工会和医疗组织抗议纽约市关闭部分公立医院并将其余医院与学术医疗中心合并的策略。他们争取到了在下东区新建一家戈弗尼尔医院的要求,但在更大范围的反对附属医院的斗争中失败了,主要原因是 20 世纪 70 年代城市面临着巨大的财政压力。在洛杉矶,瓦茨起义后的积极分子领导了一场要求新建公立医院的运动。在这方面,周宽云的比较方法提供了至关重要的见解,因为这些斗争的当地背景和时机对其结果产生了很大影响。他指出,1972 年洛杉矶急需的小马丁-路德-金医院开业时,加利福尼亚州已经开始走向 "无情的匮乏"(第 134 页),使得新的安全网医院资源匮乏。在克利夫兰,另一个在起义和城市重建中挣扎的城市,紧缩政策对穷人医院护理的侵蚀并不那么明显,Chowkwanyun 指出。该地区因去工业化而导致的人口减少缓解了对医疗服务的需求,而将公立医院和诊所交由县级而非市级管理的决定也为克利夫兰的安全网机构提供了更可靠的财政基础。但是,县并不总是积极的参与者。书中最引人注目的一章描述了阿巴拉契亚中部地区严重的腐败是如何加剧医疗不平等的。在这个医疗服务严重不足的地区,由根深蒂固的政治机器管理的郡县利用联邦 "扶贫战争 "的医疗资金为自己和亲信中饱私囊,而不是改善人们获得医疗服务的机会。在这个故事中,社区活动人士的声音得到了有力的体现,书中详细介绍了东肯塔基州福利权利组织(Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization)如何为追究地方和联邦官员的责任而斗争。Chowkwanyun 对洛杉矶和阿巴拉契亚中部环境健康运动的比较尤其具有启发性。在洛杉矶,反对雾霾的积极分子赢得了政客和当地企业的支持,他们认为更清洁的空气符合自身利益。他们还从显示空气污染有害健康的研究中找到了科学依据。但在阿巴拉契亚,"科学...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of the History of Medicine
Bulletin of the History of Medicine 医学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A leading journal in its field for more than three quarters of a century, the Bulletin spans the social, cultural, and scientific aspects of the history of medicine worldwide. Every issue includes reviews of recent books on medical history. Recurring sections include Digital Humanities & Public History and Pedagogy. Bulletin of the History of Medicine is the official publication of the American Association for the History of Medicine (AAHM) and the Johns Hopkins Institute of the History of Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信