Thermal variation in human temporal bone using rigid endoscope

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Thales Xavit Souza e Silva, Aline Bruno Figueiredo Nicolau, Marcos Luiz Antunes
{"title":"Thermal variation in human temporal bone using rigid endoscope","authors":"Thales Xavit Souza e Silva,&nbsp;Aline Bruno Figueiredo Nicolau,&nbsp;Marcos Luiz Antunes","doi":"10.1016/j.bjorl.2023.101381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Compare thermal variation in the region of the External Acoustic Canal (EAC) and the Round Window (RW) using different rigid endoscopes and light sources in human temporal bones.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>This is an analytical experimental study using human temporal bones. Thermal variation was assessed during ten minutes, using a thermometer in the region of the EAC and the RW of two temporal bones, right and left. We used three different endoscopes (0° 4-mm, 0° 3-mm and 30° 4-mm) and five intensity/type light source (Halogen 100%, LED 50%, LED 100%, Xenon 50% and Xenon 100% with the same endoscope light fiber.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We found temperature elevations in the EAC and RW in all measurements. Larger caliber endoscopes (4-mm) and light sources at 100% intensity generated higher temperatures, slightly higher in halogen and xenon. The 30° endoscopes tended to put more heat on structures, with little difference in most measurements. We identified greater temperature variations in the EAC of the right and left temporal bones compared to the RW overall. The highest temperature acquired in the present study was in the EAC of the temporal bone with a 4-mm and 30° endoscope, using xenon light source (intensity of 100%), with an increase of 4.51 °C.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The type of endoscope and light source can influence the thermal variation and the risk of tissue injury during endoscopic ear surgery. Larger endoscopes with xenon and halogen light sources at maximum intensity generate more heat.</p></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>5.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49099,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1808869423001490/pdfft?md5=bcaab238dfefca3bc1717b22cce2b9c9&pid=1-s2.0-S1808869423001490-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1808869423001490","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Compare thermal variation in the region of the External Acoustic Canal (EAC) and the Round Window (RW) using different rigid endoscopes and light sources in human temporal bones.

Method

This is an analytical experimental study using human temporal bones. Thermal variation was assessed during ten minutes, using a thermometer in the region of the EAC and the RW of two temporal bones, right and left. We used three different endoscopes (0° 4-mm, 0° 3-mm and 30° 4-mm) and five intensity/type light source (Halogen 100%, LED 50%, LED 100%, Xenon 50% and Xenon 100% with the same endoscope light fiber.

Results

We found temperature elevations in the EAC and RW in all measurements. Larger caliber endoscopes (4-mm) and light sources at 100% intensity generated higher temperatures, slightly higher in halogen and xenon. The 30° endoscopes tended to put more heat on structures, with little difference in most measurements. We identified greater temperature variations in the EAC of the right and left temporal bones compared to the RW overall. The highest temperature acquired in the present study was in the EAC of the temporal bone with a 4-mm and 30° endoscope, using xenon light source (intensity of 100%), with an increase of 4.51 °C.

Conclusion

The type of endoscope and light source can influence the thermal variation and the risk of tissue injury during endoscopic ear surgery. Larger endoscopes with xenon and halogen light sources at maximum intensity generate more heat.

Level of evidence

5.

使用刚性内窥镜观察人体颞骨的热变化
目的使用不同的刚性内窥镜和光源比较人颞骨外耳道(EAC)和圆窗(RW)区域的热变化。 方法这是一项使用人颞骨进行的分析实验研究。使用温度计对左右两块颞骨的外耳道和圆窗区域进行了十分钟的热变化评估。我们使用了三种不同的内窥镜(0° 4 毫米、0° 3 毫米和 30° 4 毫米)和五种强度/类型的光源(卤素灯 100%、LED 50%、LED 100%、氙灯 50%和氙灯 100%,使用相同的内窥镜光纤维)。较大口径的内窥镜(4 毫米)和 100% 强度的光源产生的温度较高,卤素灯和氙灯的温度略高。30° 的内窥镜往往会对结构产生更多热量,但在大多数测量中差别不大。与 RW 整体相比,我们发现左右颞骨 EAC 的温度变化更大。结论内窥镜和光源的类型会影响耳内窥镜手术中的热变化和组织损伤风险。使用氙灯和卤素灯光源的大型内窥镜在最大强度下会产生更多热量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
205
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology publishes original contributions in otolaryngology and the associated areas (cranio-maxillo-facial surgery and phoniatrics). The aim of this journal is the national and international divulgation of the scientific production interesting to the otolaryngology, as well as the discussion, in editorials, of subjects of scientific, academic and professional relevance. The Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology is born from the Revista Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia, of which it is the English version, created and indexed by MEDLINE in 2005. It is the official scientific publication of the Brazilian Association of Otolaryngology and Cervicofacial Surgery. Its abbreviated title is Braz J Otorhinolaryngol., which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信