Online false discovery rate control for LORD++ and SAFFRON under positive, local dependence

IF 1.3 3区 生物学 Q4 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Aaron Fisher
{"title":"Online false discovery rate control for LORD++ and SAFFRON under positive, local dependence","authors":"Aaron Fisher","doi":"10.1002/bimj.202300177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Online testing procedures assume that hypotheses are observed in sequence, and allow the significance thresholds for upcoming tests to depend on the test statistics observed so far. Some of the most popular online methods include alpha investing, LORD++, and SAFFRON. These three methods have been shown to provide online control of the “modified” false discovery rate (mFDR) under a condition known as CS. However, to our knowledge, LORD++ and SAFFRON have only been shown to control the traditional false discovery rate (FDR) under an independence condition on the test statistics. Our work bolsters these results by showing that SAFFRON and LORD++ additionally ensure online control of the FDR under a “local” form of nonnegative dependence. Further, FDR control is maintained under certain types of adaptive stopping rules, such as stopping after a certain number of rejections have been observed. Because alpha investing can be recovered as a special case of the SAFFRON framework, our results immediately apply to alpha investing as well. In the process of deriving these results, we also formally characterize how the conditional super-uniformity assumption implicitly limits the allowed <i>p</i>-value dependencies. This implicit limitation is important not only to our proposed FDR result, but also to many existing mFDR results.</p>","PeriodicalId":55360,"journal":{"name":"Biometrical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biometrical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bimj.202300177","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online testing procedures assume that hypotheses are observed in sequence, and allow the significance thresholds for upcoming tests to depend on the test statistics observed so far. Some of the most popular online methods include alpha investing, LORD++, and SAFFRON. These three methods have been shown to provide online control of the “modified” false discovery rate (mFDR) under a condition known as CS. However, to our knowledge, LORD++ and SAFFRON have only been shown to control the traditional false discovery rate (FDR) under an independence condition on the test statistics. Our work bolsters these results by showing that SAFFRON and LORD++ additionally ensure online control of the FDR under a “local” form of nonnegative dependence. Further, FDR control is maintained under certain types of adaptive stopping rules, such as stopping after a certain number of rejections have been observed. Because alpha investing can be recovered as a special case of the SAFFRON framework, our results immediately apply to alpha investing as well. In the process of deriving these results, we also formally characterize how the conditional super-uniformity assumption implicitly limits the allowed p-value dependencies. This implicit limitation is important not only to our proposed FDR result, but also to many existing mFDR results.

局部正相关条件下 LORD++ 和 SAFFRON 的在线错误发现率控制
在线测试程序假定假设是依次观察到的,并允许即将进行的测试的显著性阈值取决于迄今为止观察到的测试统计量。最流行的在线方法包括阿尔法投资、LORD++ 和 SAFFRON。这三种方法已被证明可以在称为 CS 的条件下对 "修正 "错误发现率(mFDR)进行在线控制。然而,据我们所知,LORD++ 和 SAFFRON 仅能在测试统计量的独立性条件下控制传统的错误发现率 (FDR)。我们的工作证明,SAFFRON 和 LORD++ 还能确保在非负依赖性的 "局部 "形式下对 FDR 进行在线控制,从而巩固了这些成果。此外,在某些类型的自适应停止规则下,例如在观察到一定数量的拒绝后停止,FDR 控制仍能保持。由于阿尔法投资可以作为 SAFFRON 框架的一个特例进行恢复,因此我们的结果也立即适用于阿尔法投资。在推导这些结果的过程中,我们还正式描述了条件超均匀性假设如何隐含地限制了允许的 p 值依赖关系。这种隐含限制不仅对我们提出的 FDR 结果很重要,而且对许多现有的 mFDR 结果也很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biometrical Journal
Biometrical Journal 生物-数学与计算生物学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
119
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biometrical Journal publishes papers on statistical methods and their applications in life sciences including medicine, environmental sciences and agriculture. Methodological developments should be motivated by an interesting and relevant problem from these areas. Ideally the manuscript should include a description of the problem and a section detailing the application of the new methodology to the problem. Case studies, review articles and letters to the editors are also welcome. Papers containing only extensive mathematical theory are not suitable for publication in Biometrical Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信