Incidental findings in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans for implant treatment planning: a retrospective study of 404 CBCT scans

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Philippe Biel, Alice Jurt, Vivianne Chappuis, Valerie G. A. Suter
{"title":"Incidental findings in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans for implant treatment planning: a retrospective study of 404 CBCT scans","authors":"Philippe Biel, Alice Jurt, Vivianne Chappuis, Valerie G. A. Suter","doi":"10.1007/s11282-023-00723-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objectives</h3><p>To investigate the prevalence of incidental findings and need for further dental treatment and analyse the influence of size of field-of-view (FOV) and age in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for pre-implant planning.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>404 CBCT scans were examined retrospectively for incidental findings and need for further dental treatment. Incidental finding-frequencies and need for further treatment were assessed for different age (&lt; 40 years, 40–60 years, &gt; 60 years) and FOV groups (small, medium, large). Intraexaminer and interexaminer agreements were evaluated.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>In 82% of the scans at least one incidental finding was found, with a total of 766 overall. More incidental findings were found in scans with large FOV (98% vs. 72%, OR = 22.39 large vs. small FOV, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001) and in scans of patients &gt; 60 years (OR = 5.37 patient’s age &gt; 60 years vs. &lt; 40 years, <i>p</i> = 0.0003). Further dental treatment due to incidental findings was needed in 31%. Scans with large FOV were more likely to entail further treatment (OR = 3.55 large vs. small FOV, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). Partial edentulism and large FOV were identified as risk factors for further treatment (<i>p</i> = 0.0003 and <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). Further referral of the patient based on incidental findings was judged as indicated in 5%. Intra- and inter-examiner agreements were excellent (kappa = 0.944/0.805).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>A considerable number of incidental findings with need for further dental treatment was found in partially edentulous patients and in patients &gt; 60 years. In pre-implant planning of elderly patients, the selection of large FOV CBCT scans, including dentoalveolar regions not X-rayed recently, help to detect therapeutically relevant incidental findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":56103,"journal":{"name":"Oral Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-023-00723-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the prevalence of incidental findings and need for further dental treatment and analyse the influence of size of field-of-view (FOV) and age in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for pre-implant planning.

Methods

404 CBCT scans were examined retrospectively for incidental findings and need for further dental treatment. Incidental finding-frequencies and need for further treatment were assessed for different age (< 40 years, 40–60 years, > 60 years) and FOV groups (small, medium, large). Intraexaminer and interexaminer agreements were evaluated.

Results

In 82% of the scans at least one incidental finding was found, with a total of 766 overall. More incidental findings were found in scans with large FOV (98% vs. 72%, OR = 22.39 large vs. small FOV, p < 0.0001) and in scans of patients > 60 years (OR = 5.37 patient’s age > 60 years vs. < 40 years, p = 0.0003). Further dental treatment due to incidental findings was needed in 31%. Scans with large FOV were more likely to entail further treatment (OR = 3.55 large vs. small FOV, p < 0.0001). Partial edentulism and large FOV were identified as risk factors for further treatment (p = 0.0003 and p < 0.0001). Further referral of the patient based on incidental findings was judged as indicated in 5%. Intra- and inter-examiner agreements were excellent (kappa = 0.944/0.805).

Conclusions

A considerable number of incidental findings with need for further dental treatment was found in partially edentulous patients and in patients > 60 years. In pre-implant planning of elderly patients, the selection of large FOV CBCT scans, including dentoalveolar regions not X-rayed recently, help to detect therapeutically relevant incidental findings.

Abstract Image

用于种植治疗规划的锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)中的意外发现:对 404 次 CBCT 扫描的回顾性研究
方法 对 404 例 CBCT 扫描进行回顾性研究,以了解偶然发现和进一步牙科治疗的需求。评估了不同年龄组(40 岁、40-60 岁、60 岁)和不同 FOV 组(小、中、大)的偶然发现频率和进一步治疗的需要。结果 在82%的扫描中发现了至少一个偶然发现,总计766个。在大视野扫描(98% vs. 72%,OR = 22.39,大视野 vs. 小视野,p = 0.0001)和 60 岁患者扫描(OR = 5.37,患者年龄为 60 岁 vs. 40 岁,p = 0.0003)中发现的偶然发现更多。31%的患者因偶然发现而需要进一步牙科治疗。大视野扫描更有可能需要进一步治疗(OR = 3.55,大视野 vs. 小视野,p = 0.0001)。部分缺牙和大 FOV 被认为是进一步治疗的风险因素(p = 0.0003 和 p < 0.0001)。根据偶发发现进一步转诊患者的比例为 5%。结论 在部分无牙颌患者和 60 岁患者中发现了大量需要进一步牙科治疗的偶然发现。在对老年患者进行种植前规划时,选择大FOV CBCT扫描,包括最近未进行X光检查的牙槽骨区域,有助于发现与治疗相关的偶然发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oral Radiology
Oral Radiology DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.60%
发文量
87
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official English-language journal of the Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and the Asian Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Oral Radiology is intended to be a forum for international collaboration in head and neck diagnostic imaging and all related fields. Oral Radiology features cutting-edge research papers, review articles, case reports, and technical notes from both the clinical and experimental fields. As membership in the Society is not a prerequisite, contributions are welcome from researchers and clinicians worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信