Analysis of gastric fluid in preterm newborns supports the view that the amniotic cavity is sterile before the onset of parturition: a retrospective cohort study
Kyong-No Lee, Hyun Ji Choi, Ha Lim Shin, Hyeon Ji Kim, Jee Yoon Park, Young Hwa Jung, Kyung Joon Oh, Chang Won Choi
{"title":"Analysis of gastric fluid in preterm newborns supports the view that the amniotic cavity is sterile before the onset of parturition: a retrospective cohort study","authors":"Kyong-No Lee, Hyun Ji Choi, Ha Lim Shin, Hyeon Ji Kim, Jee Yoon Park, Young Hwa Jung, Kyung Joon Oh, Chang Won Choi","doi":"10.1515/jpm-2023-0123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives To compare the frequency of <jats:italic>Ureaplasma</jats:italic>-positive gastric fluid (GF) cultures based on the cause and mode of delivery in preterm newborns. Methods This retrospective cohort study included women with a singleton pregnancy who delivered prematurely (between 23<jats:sup>+0</jats:sup> and 32<jats:sup>+0</jats:sup> weeks of gestation, n=464) at a single university hospital in South Korea. The newborns’ GF was obtained on the day of birth via nasogastric intubation. The frequency of <jats:italic>Ureaplasma</jats:italic> spp. in GF cultures was measured and compared according to the cause and mode of delivery. Results <jats:italic>Ureaplasma</jats:italic> spp. was detected in 20.3 % of the GF samples. The presence of <jats:italic>Ureaplasma</jats:italic> spp. was significantly higher in the spontaneous preterm birth group than in the indicated preterm birth group (30.2 vs. 3.0 %; p<0.001). Additionally, <jats:italic>Ureaplasma</jats:italic> spp. was more frequently found in the vaginal delivery group than in the cesarean delivery group, irrespective of the cause of preterm delivery [indicated preterm birth group (22.2 vs. 1.9 %, p=0.023); spontaneous preterm birth group (37.7 vs. 24.2 %, p=0.015)]. Conclusions <jats:italic>Ureaplasma</jats:italic> spp. were found in 20.3 % of the GFs. However, only 1.9 % of newborns in the indicated preterm birth group with cesarean delivery had a <jats:italic>Ureaplasma</jats:italic>-positive GF culture.","PeriodicalId":16704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2023-0123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives To compare the frequency of Ureaplasma-positive gastric fluid (GF) cultures based on the cause and mode of delivery in preterm newborns. Methods This retrospective cohort study included women with a singleton pregnancy who delivered prematurely (between 23+0 and 32+0 weeks of gestation, n=464) at a single university hospital in South Korea. The newborns’ GF was obtained on the day of birth via nasogastric intubation. The frequency of Ureaplasma spp. in GF cultures was measured and compared according to the cause and mode of delivery. Results Ureaplasma spp. was detected in 20.3 % of the GF samples. The presence of Ureaplasma spp. was significantly higher in the spontaneous preterm birth group than in the indicated preterm birth group (30.2 vs. 3.0 %; p<0.001). Additionally, Ureaplasma spp. was more frequently found in the vaginal delivery group than in the cesarean delivery group, irrespective of the cause of preterm delivery [indicated preterm birth group (22.2 vs. 1.9 %, p=0.023); spontaneous preterm birth group (37.7 vs. 24.2 %, p=0.015)]. Conclusions Ureaplasma spp. were found in 20.3 % of the GFs. However, only 1.9 % of newborns in the indicated preterm birth group with cesarean delivery had a Ureaplasma-positive GF culture.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Perinatal Medicine (JPM) is a truly international forum covering the entire field of perinatal medicine. It is an essential news source for all those obstetricians, neonatologists, perinatologists and allied health professionals who wish to keep abreast of progress in perinatal and related research. Ahead-of-print publishing ensures fastest possible knowledge transfer. The Journal provides statements on themes of topical interest as well as information and different views on controversial topics. It also informs about the academic, organisational and political aims and objectives of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine.