Toward quantification of the feasible potential of land-based carbon dioxide removal

IF 15.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Oliver Perkins, Peter Alexander, Almut Arneth, Calum Brown, James D.A. Millington, Mark Rounsevell
{"title":"Toward quantification of the feasible potential of land-based carbon dioxide removal","authors":"Oliver Perkins, Peter Alexander, Almut Arneth, Calum Brown, James D.A. Millington, Mark Rounsevell","doi":"10.1016/j.oneear.2023.11.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Global climate-change overshoot scenarios, where warming exceeds Paris Agreement limits before being brought back down, are highly dependent on land-based carbon dioxide removal (CDR). In the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Sixth Assessment Report (AR6), such scenarios are supported by optimistic global assessments of the technical and economic potential for land-based CDR. However, a further type of potential—the “feasible” potential, which includes socio-cultural, environmental, and institutional factors—is noted in the AR6 but not quantified. Here, we set out research frameworks to work toward quantification of this feasible potential. We first argue that quantifying the feasible potential will substantially reduce current assessed CDR potential. Second, we demonstrate how transdisciplinary methods are improving understanding of feasibility constraints on land-based CDR. Third, we explore frameworks for synthesizing these advances during the next IPCC assessment process. We conclude that the research community should carefully consider the use of techno-economic CDR assessments in evidence for policymakers.</p>","PeriodicalId":52366,"journal":{"name":"One Earth","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"One Earth","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.11.011","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Global climate-change overshoot scenarios, where warming exceeds Paris Agreement limits before being brought back down, are highly dependent on land-based carbon dioxide removal (CDR). In the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Sixth Assessment Report (AR6), such scenarios are supported by optimistic global assessments of the technical and economic potential for land-based CDR. However, a further type of potential—the “feasible” potential, which includes socio-cultural, environmental, and institutional factors—is noted in the AR6 but not quantified. Here, we set out research frameworks to work toward quantification of this feasible potential. We first argue that quantifying the feasible potential will substantially reduce current assessed CDR potential. Second, we demonstrate how transdisciplinary methods are improving understanding of feasibility constraints on land-based CDR. Third, we explore frameworks for synthesizing these advances during the next IPCC assessment process. We conclude that the research community should carefully consider the use of techno-economic CDR assessments in evidence for policymakers.

量化陆基二氧化碳清除的可行潜力
全球气候变化超调情景,即升温超过《巴黎协定》的限制后再回落,在很大程度上依赖于陆基二氧化碳清除(CDR)。在政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)第六次评估报告(AR6)中,对陆基二氧化碳减排技术和经济潜力的乐观全球评估支持了这些情景。然而,第六次评估报告中还提到了另一种潜力--"可行 "潜力,其中包括社会文化、环境和制度因素,但没有量化。在此,我们提出了研究框架,致力于量化这种可行的潜力。首先,我们认为量化可行潜力将大大降低目前评估的 CDR 潜力。其次,我们展示了跨学科方法如何改善对陆基 CDR 可行性限制的理解。第三,我们探讨了在下一次 IPCC 评估过程中综合这些进展的框架。我们的结论是,研究界应仔细考虑将 CDR 技术经济评估用于为决策者提供证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
One Earth
One Earth Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.90%
发文量
159
期刊介绍: One Earth, Cell Press' flagship sustainability journal, serves as a platform for high-quality research and perspectives that contribute to a deeper understanding and resolution of contemporary sustainability challenges. With monthly thematic issues, the journal aims to bridge gaps between natural, social, and applied sciences, along with the humanities. One Earth fosters the cross-pollination of ideas, inspiring transformative research to address the complexities of sustainability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信