Staphylococcus epidermidis joint isolates: Whole-genome sequencing demonstrates evidence of hospital transmission and common antimicrobial resistance

Samantha J. Simon, Mohamad Sater, Ian Herriott, Miriam Huntley, Emma Briars, Brian L. Hollenbeck
{"title":"Staphylococcus epidermidis joint isolates: Whole-genome sequencing demonstrates evidence of hospital transmission and common antimicrobial resistance","authors":"Samantha J. Simon, Mohamad Sater, Ian Herriott, Miriam Huntley, Emma Briars, Brian L. Hollenbeck","doi":"10.1017/ice.2023.253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: We investigated genetic, epidemiologic, and environmental factors contributing to positive <jats:italic>Staphylococcus epidermidis</jats:italic> joint cultures. Design: Retrospective cohort study with whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Patients: We identified <jats:italic>S. epidermidis</jats:italic> isolates from hip or knee cultures in patients with 1 or more prior corresponding intra-articular procedure at our hospital. Methods: WGS and single-nucleotide polymorphism–based clonality analyses were performed, including species identification, in silico multilocus sequence typing (MLST), phylogenomic analysis, and genotypic assessment of the prevalence of specific antibiotic resistance and virulence genes. Epidemiologic review was performed to compare cluster and noncluster cases. Results: In total, 60 phenotypically distinct <jats:italic>S. epidermidis</jats:italic> isolates were identified. After removal of duplicates and impure samples, 48 isolates were used for the phylogenomic analysis, and 45 (93.7%) isolates were included in the clonality analysis. Notably, 5 <jats:italic>S. epidermidis</jats:italic> strains (10.4%) showed phenotypic susceptibility to oxacillin yet harbored <jats:italic>mecA</jats:italic>, and 3 (6.2%) strains showed phenotypic resistance despite not having <jats:italic>mecA</jats:italic>. <jats:italic>Smr</jats:italic> was found in all isolates, and <jats:italic>mupA</jats:italic> positivity was not observed. We also identified 6 clonal clusters from the clonality analysis, which accounted for 14 (31.1%) of the 45 <jats:italic>S. epidermidis</jats:italic> isolates. Our epidemiologic investigation revealed ties to common aspirations or operative procedures, although no specific common source was identified. Conclusions: Most <jats:italic>S. epidermidis</jats:italic> isolates from clinical joint samples are diverse in origin, but we identified an important subset of 31.1% that belonged to subclinical healthcare–associated clusters. Clusters appeared to resolve spontaneously over time, suggesting the benefit of routine hospital infection control and disinfection practices.","PeriodicalId":13558,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2023.253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We investigated genetic, epidemiologic, and environmental factors contributing to positive Staphylococcus epidermidis joint cultures. Design: Retrospective cohort study with whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Patients: We identified S. epidermidis isolates from hip or knee cultures in patients with 1 or more prior corresponding intra-articular procedure at our hospital. Methods: WGS and single-nucleotide polymorphism–based clonality analyses were performed, including species identification, in silico multilocus sequence typing (MLST), phylogenomic analysis, and genotypic assessment of the prevalence of specific antibiotic resistance and virulence genes. Epidemiologic review was performed to compare cluster and noncluster cases. Results: In total, 60 phenotypically distinct S. epidermidis isolates were identified. After removal of duplicates and impure samples, 48 isolates were used for the phylogenomic analysis, and 45 (93.7%) isolates were included in the clonality analysis. Notably, 5 S. epidermidis strains (10.4%) showed phenotypic susceptibility to oxacillin yet harbored mecA, and 3 (6.2%) strains showed phenotypic resistance despite not having mecA. Smr was found in all isolates, and mupA positivity was not observed. We also identified 6 clonal clusters from the clonality analysis, which accounted for 14 (31.1%) of the 45 S. epidermidis isolates. Our epidemiologic investigation revealed ties to common aspirations or operative procedures, although no specific common source was identified. Conclusions: Most S. epidermidis isolates from clinical joint samples are diverse in origin, but we identified an important subset of 31.1% that belonged to subclinical healthcare–associated clusters. Clusters appeared to resolve spontaneously over time, suggesting the benefit of routine hospital infection control and disinfection practices.
表皮葡萄球菌关节分离株:全基因组测序显示医院传播和常见抗菌药耐药性的证据
目的:我们调查了导致表皮葡萄球菌关节培养阳性的遗传、流行病学和环境因素。设计:全基因组测序(WGS)的回顾性队列研究。患者:我们从髋关节或膝关节培养物中分离出了表皮葡萄球菌,这些患者曾在本院接受过一次或多次相应的关节内手术。方法:WGS 和单核苷酸测序:进行了 WGS 和基于单核苷酸多态性的克隆分析,包括物种鉴定、硅多焦点序列分型 (MLST)、系统发生组分析以及特定抗生素耐药性和毒力基因流行率的基因型评估。还进行了流行病学回顾,以比较集群病例和非集群病例。结果:共鉴定出 60 株表型不同的表皮葡萄球菌分离株。去除重复样本和不纯样本后,48 个分离株被用于系统发生组分析,45 个分离株(93.7%)被纳入克隆性分析。值得注意的是,5 株表皮葡萄球菌(10.4%)对奥沙西林表现出表型敏感性,但却携带有 mecA;3 株(6.2%)尽管没有 mecA,但却表现出表型耐药性。在所有分离株中都发现了 Smr,但未观察到 mupA 阳性。我们还从克隆性分析中发现了 6 个克隆群,在 45 株表皮葡萄球菌分离物中占 14 株(31.1%)。我们的流行病学调查显示,虽然没有发现具体的共同来源,但与常见的抽吸或手术过程有关。得出结论:大多数 S. 表皮真菌分离株与常见的抽吸或手术过程有关:从临床关节样本中分离出的大多数表皮葡萄球菌来源多种多样,但我们发现有31.1%的重要亚群属于亚临床医疗相关菌群。随着时间的推移,集群似乎会自发消退,这表明常规医院感染控制和消毒措施是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信