Medical service utilization patterns among adults with insomnia: A retrospective cohort study

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Min Kyung Hyun, Jang Won Lee
{"title":"Medical service utilization patterns among adults with insomnia: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"Min Kyung Hyun,&nbsp;Jang Won Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.eujim.2023.102325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Patients with insomnia can use Korean medicine (KM) alongside conventional medicine (CM) as treatment options within the Korean healthcare system, but the treatment patterns for insomnia remain unclear. This study evaluated the incidence of newly diagnosed insomnia and medical service utilization, including untreated, CM, KM, and concurrent use of CM and KM, and the determinants of treatment after the insomnia diagnosis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective cohort study analyzed adult Korean patients newly diagnosed with insomnia between 2016 and 2018 using National Health Insurance Service data. The cohort who met the eligibility criteria for insomnia was followed up until 2019 to identify their medical service utilization and the determinants. The medical service utilization was defined based on outpatient visits or hospitalization records with insomnia as the primary diagnosis. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis were used to identify the medical service utilization and its determinants.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the 336,578 patients newly diagnosed with insomnia in 2016–2018, only 155,538 (46.21 %) received more than two insomnia treatments during the follow-up period. Of these, 104,751 (67.35 %), 41,762 (26.85 %), and 9,025 (5.80 %) patients received CM monotherapy, KM alone, and both CM and KM, respectively. The statistically significant factors for receiving insomnia treatment after diagnosis were female, age ≥30 years, Seoul capital area residents, lowest income quintile, National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) enrollment types excluding the employee type, and longer elapsed time after diagnosis. The factors for receiving KM alone rather than CM alone were female, aged 40–79 years, residents of the Seoul capital area and metropolitan city, higher income, employee type among the NHIS enrollment types, and a more recent diagnosis. The common factor for concurrent use rather than CM alone was aged 40–79 years, and concurrent use rather than KM alone was being male.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>More than half of the patients with insomnia received treatment only once. The utilization of CM or KM alone was higher than that of their combined use. Healthcare professionals can utilize these findings to manage patients with insomnia effectively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876382023001014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Patients with insomnia can use Korean medicine (KM) alongside conventional medicine (CM) as treatment options within the Korean healthcare system, but the treatment patterns for insomnia remain unclear. This study evaluated the incidence of newly diagnosed insomnia and medical service utilization, including untreated, CM, KM, and concurrent use of CM and KM, and the determinants of treatment after the insomnia diagnosis.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study analyzed adult Korean patients newly diagnosed with insomnia between 2016 and 2018 using National Health Insurance Service data. The cohort who met the eligibility criteria for insomnia was followed up until 2019 to identify their medical service utilization and the determinants. The medical service utilization was defined based on outpatient visits or hospitalization records with insomnia as the primary diagnosis. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis were used to identify the medical service utilization and its determinants.

Results

Among the 336,578 patients newly diagnosed with insomnia in 2016–2018, only 155,538 (46.21 %) received more than two insomnia treatments during the follow-up period. Of these, 104,751 (67.35 %), 41,762 (26.85 %), and 9,025 (5.80 %) patients received CM monotherapy, KM alone, and both CM and KM, respectively. The statistically significant factors for receiving insomnia treatment after diagnosis were female, age ≥30 years, Seoul capital area residents, lowest income quintile, National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) enrollment types excluding the employee type, and longer elapsed time after diagnosis. The factors for receiving KM alone rather than CM alone were female, aged 40–79 years, residents of the Seoul capital area and metropolitan city, higher income, employee type among the NHIS enrollment types, and a more recent diagnosis. The common factor for concurrent use rather than CM alone was aged 40–79 years, and concurrent use rather than KM alone was being male.

Conclusions

More than half of the patients with insomnia received treatment only once. The utilization of CM or KM alone was higher than that of their combined use. Healthcare professionals can utilize these findings to manage patients with insomnia effectively.

成人失眠症患者的医疗服务使用模式:回顾性队列研究
导言:在韩国医疗系统中,失眠症患者可以使用韩医(KM)和传统医学(CM)作为治疗选择,但失眠症的治疗模式仍不明确。本研究评估了新诊断失眠症的发病率和医疗服务使用情况,包括未经治疗、中医、韩医、同时使用中医和韩医,以及失眠症诊断后治疗的决定因素。方法这项回顾性队列研究利用国民健康保险服务数据分析了2016年至2018年期间新诊断为失眠症的韩国成年患者。研究人员对符合失眠症资格标准的人群进行了随访,直至2019年,以确定他们的医疗服务使用情况及其决定因素。医疗服务使用的定义基于以失眠为主要诊断的门诊就诊或住院记录。结果在2016-2018年新确诊的336578名失眠患者中,只有155538人(46.21%)在随访期间接受了两次以上的失眠治疗。其中,104751 人(67.35%)、41762 人(26.85%)和 9025 人(5.80%)分别接受了中药单药治疗、中药单独治疗以及中药和中药同时治疗。女性、年龄≥30 岁、首尔首都地区居民、最低收入五分位数、国民健康保险服务(NHIS)参保类型(雇员类型除外)和确诊后时间较长是确诊后接受失眠治疗的重要统计因素。女性、40-79 岁、首尔首都地区和首都圈居民、较高收入、国民健康保险服务(NHIS)参保类型中的雇员类型以及较近的诊断时间是单独接受 KM 而非单独接受 CM 的因素。同时使用而非单独使用中药的共同因素是年龄在 40-79 岁之间,同时使用而非单独使用孔明灯的共同因素是男性。半数以上的失眠患者只接受过一次治疗,单独使用中药或孔明粉的比例高于同时使用这两种药物的比例。医护人员可以利用这些发现有效地管理失眠患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Integrative Medicine
European Journal of Integrative Medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
102
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Integrative Medicine (EuJIM) considers manuscripts from a wide range of complementary and integrative health care disciplines, with a particular focus on whole systems approaches, public health, self management and traditional medical systems. The journal strives to connect conventional medicine and evidence based complementary medicine. We encourage submissions reporting research with relevance for integrative clinical practice and interprofessional education. EuJIM aims to be of interest to both conventional and integrative audiences, including healthcare practitioners, researchers, health care organisations, educationalists, and all those who seek objective and critical information on integrative medicine. To achieve this aim EuJIM provides an innovative international and interdisciplinary platform linking researchers and clinicians. The journal focuses primarily on original research articles including systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, other clinical studies, qualitative, observational and epidemiological studies. In addition we welcome short reviews, opinion articles and contributions relating to health services and policy, health economics and psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信