What do remote outer island populations in the Pacific think about foreign aid? Insights from Mauke, Cook Islands

IF 2 3区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Kim Andreas Kessler
{"title":"What do remote outer island populations in the Pacific think about foreign aid? Insights from Mauke, Cook Islands","authors":"Kim Andreas Kessler","doi":"10.1111/dpr.12759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Motivation</h3>\n \n <p>Pacific aid research has largely focused on national issues and social justice, rather than spatial justice and the development of remote outer islands. In particular, the perspectives of remote outer island populations on aid have not previously been assessed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study explores the experiences and views of the population of a remote Pacific outer island, Mauke in the Cook Islands, on the foreign aid they receive. By listening to and learning from local people living with aid on a remote outer island, this article seeks to address spatially insensitive Pacific aid research and policy. Based on these insights, the article derives policy implications for aid and development actors working on Mauke and other remote outer islands in the Pacific.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and approach</h3>\n \n <p>Employing a mixed-methods approach, this article draws on field research conducted on Mauke, involving in-depth semi-structured interviews and a quantitative survey.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>The people of Mauke are divided about whether the island should receive more or less aid. Those calling for more aid tend to be younger; they stress the need for infrastructure development. Those advocating for less aid tend to be older; they argue that aid has harmed Mauke by decreasing endogenous initiatives and creating social tensions, both of which reduce social cohesion among the remote island population.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Policy implications</h3>\n \n <p>Rather than investing in “community-based/−led development”—doing development with the community, aid to remote Pacific outer islands should focus more on “community development”—with the aim of enhancing social cohesion among peripheral islands. Donors, governments, and development partners must carefully reflect on the degree to which their interventions may harm social cohesion and the endogenous development potential of remote outer island populations. These implications matter given the persistence of uncritical (mis)representations and (mis)conceptions of remote Pacific outer island populations as harmonious and mutually supportive.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51478,"journal":{"name":"Development Policy Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dpr.12759","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dpr.12759","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Motivation

Pacific aid research has largely focused on national issues and social justice, rather than spatial justice and the development of remote outer islands. In particular, the perspectives of remote outer island populations on aid have not previously been assessed.

Purpose

This study explores the experiences and views of the population of a remote Pacific outer island, Mauke in the Cook Islands, on the foreign aid they receive. By listening to and learning from local people living with aid on a remote outer island, this article seeks to address spatially insensitive Pacific aid research and policy. Based on these insights, the article derives policy implications for aid and development actors working on Mauke and other remote outer islands in the Pacific.

Methods and approach

Employing a mixed-methods approach, this article draws on field research conducted on Mauke, involving in-depth semi-structured interviews and a quantitative survey.

Findings

The people of Mauke are divided about whether the island should receive more or less aid. Those calling for more aid tend to be younger; they stress the need for infrastructure development. Those advocating for less aid tend to be older; they argue that aid has harmed Mauke by decreasing endogenous initiatives and creating social tensions, both of which reduce social cohesion among the remote island population.

Policy implications

Rather than investing in “community-based/−led development”—doing development with the community, aid to remote Pacific outer islands should focus more on “community development”—with the aim of enhancing social cohesion among peripheral islands. Donors, governments, and development partners must carefully reflect on the degree to which their interventions may harm social cohesion and the endogenous development potential of remote outer island populations. These implications matter given the persistence of uncritical (mis)representations and (mis)conceptions of remote Pacific outer island populations as harmonious and mutually supportive.

Abstract Image

太平洋偏远外岛居民如何看待外国援助?库克群岛毛克岛的见解
动机太平洋援助研究主要集中在国家问题和社会正义,而不是空间正义和偏远外岛的发展。特别是边远外岛居民对援助的看法以前没有得到评估。本研究探讨了库克群岛偏远的太平洋外岛莫克岛居民接受外援的经历和看法。通过倾听和学习生活在偏远外岛的当地援助人员的意见,本文试图解决太平洋援助研究和政策在空间上不敏感的问题。基于这些见解,本文得出了对在莫克岛和其他太平洋偏远外岛工作的援助和发展行动者的政策启示。本文采用混合方法对Mauke进行实地研究,包括深度半结构化访谈和定量调查。莫克岛的人们在是否应该接受更多或更少援助的问题上存在分歧。那些要求更多援助的人往往更年轻;他们强调基础设施发展的必要性。那些主张减少援助的人往往年纪较大;他们认为,援助减少了内生的主动性,造成了社会紧张,这两者都降低了偏远岛屿人口之间的社会凝聚力,从而损害了莫克岛。对偏远太平洋外岛的援助不应投资于“以社区为主导的发展”(与社区一起发展),而应更多地侧重于“社区发展”,目的是加强周边岛屿之间的社会凝聚力。捐助者、政府和发展伙伴必须仔细考虑它们的干预可能在多大程度上损害偏远外岛人口的社会凝聚力和内在发展潜力。鉴于一直存在不加批判的(错误的)表述和(错误的)概念,即偏远的太平洋外岛人口是和谐和相互支持的,这些影响很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Development Policy Review
Development Policy Review DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Development Policy Review is the refereed journal that makes the crucial links between research and policy in international development. Edited by staff of the Overseas Development Institute, the London-based think-tank on international development and humanitarian issues, it publishes single articles and theme issues on topics at the forefront of current development policy debate. Coverage includes the latest thinking and research on poverty-reduction strategies, inequality and social exclusion, property rights and sustainable livelihoods, globalisation in trade and finance, and the reform of global governance. Informed, rigorous, multi-disciplinary and up-to-the-minute, DPR is an indispensable tool for development researchers and practitioners alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信