Rapid functional but slow species diversity recovery of steppe vegetation on former arable fields in southern Ukraine

IF 2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Iwona Dembicz, Maria Zachwatowicz, Ivan Moysiyenko, Viktor Shapoval, Bożena Smreczak, Natalia Zagorodniuk, Anastasia Davydova, Denys Vynokurov, Hallie Seiler, Barbara Sudnik-Wójcikowska
{"title":"Rapid functional but slow species diversity recovery of steppe vegetation on former arable fields in southern Ukraine","authors":"Iwona Dembicz,&nbsp;Maria Zachwatowicz,&nbsp;Ivan Moysiyenko,&nbsp;Viktor Shapoval,&nbsp;Bożena Smreczak,&nbsp;Natalia Zagorodniuk,&nbsp;Anastasia Davydova,&nbsp;Denys Vynokurov,&nbsp;Hallie Seiler,&nbsp;Barbara Sudnik-Wójcikowska","doi":"10.1111/avsc.12756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Questions</h3>\n \n <p>European steppes are among the most threatened ecosystems in the Palaearctic region, mainly because of conversion to arable land. Abandonment may allow for the passive recovery of steppes. We made use of an exceptional old-field succession chronosequence of nearly 100 years to answer the following questions: (a) Are the plant species composition, species richness and functional characteristics typical of virgin grass steppes able to self-restore during ca. 100 years after abandonment? (b) Do the rates of recovery of the above vegetation characteristics differ over the studied chronosequence? (c) Do topsoil carbon and nitrogen content change over the succession chronosequence, leading to concentrations similar to that of virgin steppes?</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Southern Ukraine.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We sampled vegetation and soil in a virgin grass steppe and in old fields abandoned for 6, 15, 31, 50 and ca. 97 years. We subjected the composition data to multivariate analysis. To test whether species richness, functional and soil characteristics of the old fields diverge from those of the virgin steppe, we used one-way analysis of variance with Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) statistic to create 90% confidence intervals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The vegetation composition of the three most recently abandoned old fields differed significantly from that of the virgin steppe. The species richness of vascular plants was lower in old fields than in the virgin steppe. The share of steppe habitat specialists was similar to the virgin steppe only in the field abandoned for ca. 97 years. Functional characteristics were significantly different from the virgin steppe only in the most recently abandoned old field. Contents of C<sub>org</sub> and N<sub>tot</sub> in fields abandoned for ≤50 years were lower compared with the virgin steppe.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The functional characteristics of steppe vegetation seem to recover much faster than its biodiversity. However, based on our results, 100 years can be enough time for the spontaneous re-establishment of typical steppe vegetation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55494,"journal":{"name":"Applied Vegetation Science","volume":"26 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/avsc.12756","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Vegetation Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/avsc.12756","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Questions

European steppes are among the most threatened ecosystems in the Palaearctic region, mainly because of conversion to arable land. Abandonment may allow for the passive recovery of steppes. We made use of an exceptional old-field succession chronosequence of nearly 100 years to answer the following questions: (a) Are the plant species composition, species richness and functional characteristics typical of virgin grass steppes able to self-restore during ca. 100 years after abandonment? (b) Do the rates of recovery of the above vegetation characteristics differ over the studied chronosequence? (c) Do topsoil carbon and nitrogen content change over the succession chronosequence, leading to concentrations similar to that of virgin steppes?

Location

Southern Ukraine.

Methods

We sampled vegetation and soil in a virgin grass steppe and in old fields abandoned for 6, 15, 31, 50 and ca. 97 years. We subjected the composition data to multivariate analysis. To test whether species richness, functional and soil characteristics of the old fields diverge from those of the virgin steppe, we used one-way analysis of variance with Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) statistic to create 90% confidence intervals.

Results

The vegetation composition of the three most recently abandoned old fields differed significantly from that of the virgin steppe. The species richness of vascular plants was lower in old fields than in the virgin steppe. The share of steppe habitat specialists was similar to the virgin steppe only in the field abandoned for ca. 97 years. Functional characteristics were significantly different from the virgin steppe only in the most recently abandoned old field. Contents of Corg and Ntot in fields abandoned for ≤50 years were lower compared with the virgin steppe.

Conclusions

The functional characteristics of steppe vegetation seem to recover much faster than its biodiversity. However, based on our results, 100 years can be enough time for the spontaneous re-establishment of typical steppe vegetation.

Abstract Image

乌克兰南部前耕地上的草原植被功能恢复迅速,但物种多样性恢复缓慢
欧洲大草原是古北地区最受威胁的生态系统之一,主要是因为它们被转化为可耕地。撂荒可以使草原被动恢复。本文利用一个特殊的近100年的老田演替时序来回答以下问题:(a)原始草原区的典型植物物种组成、物种丰富度和功能特征在撂荒后约100年内是否能够自我恢复?(b)上述植被特征的恢复速度是否随所研究的时间顺序而有所不同?(c)表层土壤碳和氮含量是否随演替时间顺序而变化,从而导致与原始草原相似的浓度?地点:乌克兰南部。方法在6年、15年、31年、50年、约97年的原始草原和废弃旧田进行植被和土壤取样。我们对成分数据进行了多变量分析。为了检验老田的物种丰富度、功能和土壤特征是否与原始草原有差异,我们采用单向方差分析和Tukey's诚实显著差异(HSD)统计建立了90%的置信区间。结果3个最近撂荒老田的植被组成与原始草原有显著差异。老田维管植物的物种丰富度低于原始草原。在废弃约97年的原野中,草原生境专家的比例与原始草原相似。仅在最近撂荒的老原野中,功能特征与原始草原有显著差异。撂荒≤50年的草地,与原始草原相比,cog和Ntot含量较低。结论草原植被功能特征的恢复速度远大于其生物多样性的恢复速度。然而,根据我们的研究结果,100年的时间足以使典型的草原植被自发重建。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Vegetation Science
Applied Vegetation Science 环境科学-林学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
10.70%
发文量
67
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Applied Vegetation Science focuses on community-level topics relevant to human interaction with vegetation, including global change, nature conservation, nature management, restoration of plant communities and of natural habitats, and the planning of semi-natural and urban landscapes. Vegetation survey, modelling and remote-sensing applications are welcome. Papers on vegetation science which do not fit to this scope (do not have an applied aspect and are not vegetation survey) should be directed to our associate journal, the Journal of Vegetation Science. Both journals publish papers on the ecology of a single species only if it plays a key role in structuring plant communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信