PP153 Efficacy And Safety of Onasemnogene Abeparvovec For The Treatment Of Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 1: Meta-Analysis

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Stefani Borges, Brígida Fernandes, Fernanda Rodrigues, Bárbara Krug, Hérica Núbia Cirilo, Ida Vanessa Schwartz, Livia Probst, Ivan Zimmermann
{"title":"PP153 Efficacy And Safety of Onasemnogene Abeparvovec For The Treatment Of Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 1: Meta-Analysis","authors":"Stefani Borges, Brígida Fernandes, Fernanda Rodrigues, Bárbara Krug, Hérica Núbia Cirilo, Ida Vanessa Schwartz, Livia Probst, Ivan Zimmermann","doi":"10.1017/s0266462323002556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span>Introduction</span><p>Onasemnogene abeparvovec has been approved for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy 5q (SMA) type 1 in several countries, which calls for an independent assessment of its evidence regarding efficacy and safety.</p><span>Methods</span><p>This study results from searches conducted on databases MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS and Cochrane Library up to November 2022, supported by additional searches on registry databases and by manual searches of references listed in eligible studies. Outcomes of interest were global survival and mechanical-ventilation-free survival, improvement in motor function and treatment-related adverse events. Risk of bias was assessed via ROBINS-I and certainty of evidence via GRADE. Proportional meta-analysis models were performed when applicable.</p><span>Results</span><p>Four reports of three open-label, non-comparative clinical trials (START, STR1VE-US and STR1VE-EU) covering 67 patients were included in review. Meta-analyses of data available in a 12-month follow-up estimate a global survival of 97.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 92.6, 99.9; I2 = 0%, n=67), an event-free survival of 96.5% (95%CI: 90.8, 99.5; I2 = 32%, n=66) and a CHOP-INTEND score of 40 points or less proportion of 87.3% (95%CI: 69.8, 97.8; I2 = 69%, n=67). Proportions of 61.1% (95%CI: 40, 80.2; I² = 62%, n=67) of serious adverse events and of 58.4% (95%CI: 46.5, 69.8; I2 = 78%, n=67) of treatment-related adverse events are estimated. Despite the significant effect magnitude, reviewed studies were assessed as high risk of bias and as having very low certainty of evidence due to imprecision and risk of bias.</p><span>Conclusions</span><p>Reduced sample size and follow-up time offer uncertainties as regards the long-term benefits of the gene therapy, which strongly calls for the monitoring and assessment of results in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462323002556","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Onasemnogene abeparvovec has been approved for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy 5q (SMA) type 1 in several countries, which calls for an independent assessment of its evidence regarding efficacy and safety.

Methods

This study results from searches conducted on databases MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS and Cochrane Library up to November 2022, supported by additional searches on registry databases and by manual searches of references listed in eligible studies. Outcomes of interest were global survival and mechanical-ventilation-free survival, improvement in motor function and treatment-related adverse events. Risk of bias was assessed via ROBINS-I and certainty of evidence via GRADE. Proportional meta-analysis models were performed when applicable.

Results

Four reports of three open-label, non-comparative clinical trials (START, STR1VE-US and STR1VE-EU) covering 67 patients were included in review. Meta-analyses of data available in a 12-month follow-up estimate a global survival of 97.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 92.6, 99.9; I2 = 0%, n=67), an event-free survival of 96.5% (95%CI: 90.8, 99.5; I2 = 32%, n=66) and a CHOP-INTEND score of 40 points or less proportion of 87.3% (95%CI: 69.8, 97.8; I2 = 69%, n=67). Proportions of 61.1% (95%CI: 40, 80.2; I² = 62%, n=67) of serious adverse events and of 58.4% (95%CI: 46.5, 69.8; I2 = 78%, n=67) of treatment-related adverse events are estimated. Despite the significant effect magnitude, reviewed studies were assessed as high risk of bias and as having very low certainty of evidence due to imprecision and risk of bias.

Conclusions

Reduced sample size and follow-up time offer uncertainties as regards the long-term benefits of the gene therapy, which strongly calls for the monitoring and assessment of results in clinical practice.

PP153 Onasemnogene Abeparvovec 治疗 1 型脊髓性肌肉萎缩症患者的有效性和安全性:Meta 分析
onasemnogene abparvovec已在多个国家被批准用于治疗1型脊髓性肌萎缩5q (SMA),这要求对其有效性和安全性的证据进行独立评估。方法本研究结果来源于截至2022年11月在MEDLINE、Embase、LILACS和Cochrane Library数据库中进行的检索,并辅以对注册数据库的额外检索和对符合条件的研究中列出的参考文献的人工检索。关注的结果是总体生存和无机械通气生存、运动功能改善和治疗相关不良事件。通过ROBINS-I评估偏倚风险,通过GRADE评估证据的确定性。适用时采用比例元分析模型。结果共纳入67例患者的3项开放标签、非比较临床试验(START、STR1VE-US和STR1VE-EU)的4份报告。对12个月随访数据的荟萃分析估计,总体生存率为97.6%(95%置信区间[CI]: 92.6, 99.9;I2 = 0%, n=67),无事件生存率为96.5% (95%CI: 90.8, 99.5;I2 = 32%, n=66), chop - intent评分在40分及以下的比例为87.3% (95%CI: 69.8, 97.8;I2 = 69%, n=67)。占61.1% (95%CI: 40,80.2;I²= 62%,n=67)严重不良事件发生率为58.4% (95%CI: 46.5, 69.8;估计治疗相关不良事件(I2 = 78%, n=67)。尽管效果显著,但由于不精确和偏倚风险,所审查的研究被评估为高偏倚风险,证据确定性非常低。结论样本量和随访时间的减少为基因治疗的长期获益提供了不确定性,这强烈要求在临床实践中对结果进行监测和评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.60%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信