Experimental evaluation of asphalt mixtures with emerging additives against cracking and moisture damage

Md. Tanvir A. Sarkar, Mostafa A. Elseifi
{"title":"Experimental evaluation of asphalt mixtures with emerging additives against cracking and moisture damage","authors":"Md. Tanvir A. Sarkar,&nbsp;Mostafa A. Elseifi","doi":"10.1016/j.jreng.2023.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The objective of this study was to evaluate and recommend an asphalt mixture design with emerging additive technologies that would provide superior performance against asphalt concrete (AC) stripping and cracking. To achieve this objective, a laboratory test program was developed to evaluate the use of nanomaterials (nanoclay and graphene nanoplatelet), an emerging anti-stripping agent (adhere), and warm-mix asphalt technologies (ZycoTherm, Sasobit, and EvoTherm). Two mix types were evaluated, which were a stone-matrix asphalt (SMA) and a dense-graded binder mix. In addition, the modified Lottman test (AASHTO T 283) and the indirect tensile asphalt cracking test (IDEAL-CT) test were used as performance indicators of moisture damage resistance and cracking susceptibility. Results were analyzed statistically to identify and quantify the effects of the design variables and selected additives on the performance, moisture damage resistance, and durability of asphalt mixes. Based on the cracking test results, a superior cracking resistance performance was observed with ZycoTherm, irrespective of the mix type. Adhere had the lowest average cracking indices for both mix types, which suggest that it would not perform as well as the other additives in terms of cracking resistance. Overall, SMA mixes displayed greater cracking resistance than the dense-graded mixtures, which may have been the result of the reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) material used in the dense-graded mix and its lower asphalt binder content. In terms of moisture resistance, both nanomaterials (graphene nanoplatelet and nanoclay) did not perform well as they did not meet the minimum required tensile strength ratio (TSR) criterion (&gt;0.80). In addition, nanomaterials showed the lowest TSR values in both mix types suggesting that their effectiveness against moisture-induced damage may not be as good as warm-mix additives. On the other hand, warm-mix additives were expected to show enhanced performance in terms of moisture resistance as compared to the other additives evaluated in this study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100830,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Road Engineering","volume":"3 4","pages":"Pages 336-349"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Road Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2097049823000537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate and recommend an asphalt mixture design with emerging additive technologies that would provide superior performance against asphalt concrete (AC) stripping and cracking. To achieve this objective, a laboratory test program was developed to evaluate the use of nanomaterials (nanoclay and graphene nanoplatelet), an emerging anti-stripping agent (adhere), and warm-mix asphalt technologies (ZycoTherm, Sasobit, and EvoTherm). Two mix types were evaluated, which were a stone-matrix asphalt (SMA) and a dense-graded binder mix. In addition, the modified Lottman test (AASHTO T 283) and the indirect tensile asphalt cracking test (IDEAL-CT) test were used as performance indicators of moisture damage resistance and cracking susceptibility. Results were analyzed statistically to identify and quantify the effects of the design variables and selected additives on the performance, moisture damage resistance, and durability of asphalt mixes. Based on the cracking test results, a superior cracking resistance performance was observed with ZycoTherm, irrespective of the mix type. Adhere had the lowest average cracking indices for both mix types, which suggest that it would not perform as well as the other additives in terms of cracking resistance. Overall, SMA mixes displayed greater cracking resistance than the dense-graded mixtures, which may have been the result of the reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) material used in the dense-graded mix and its lower asphalt binder content. In terms of moisture resistance, both nanomaterials (graphene nanoplatelet and nanoclay) did not perform well as they did not meet the minimum required tensile strength ratio (TSR) criterion (>0.80). In addition, nanomaterials showed the lowest TSR values in both mix types suggesting that their effectiveness against moisture-induced damage may not be as good as warm-mix additives. On the other hand, warm-mix additives were expected to show enhanced performance in terms of moisture resistance as compared to the other additives evaluated in this study.
使用新型添加剂的沥青混合料抗开裂和湿害试验评估
本研究的目的是评估和推荐一种具有新兴添加剂技术的沥青混合料设计,这种技术可以提供优异的抗沥青混凝土(AC)剥离和开裂性能。为了实现这一目标,我们开发了一个实验室测试程序来评估纳米材料(纳米粘土和石墨烯纳米板)、一种新兴的抗剥离剂(粘着剂)和温拌沥青技术(ZycoTherm、Sasobit和EvoTherm)的使用情况。评估了两种混合类型,即石基沥青(SMA)和密级配粘结剂混合料。此外,采用改进的Lottman试验(AASHTO T 283)和间接拉伸沥青开裂试验(IDEAL-CT)作为抗湿损伤和开裂敏感性的性能指标。结果进行了统计分析,以确定和量化设计变量和所选添加剂对沥青混合料性能、抗湿损伤性和耐久性的影响。根据开裂试验结果,无论混合类型如何,ZycoTherm都具有优异的抗裂性能。黏合剂在两种混合类型中的平均开裂指数最低,这表明它在抗裂性方面的表现不如其他添加剂。总体而言,SMA混合料比密集级配混合料表现出更强的抗裂性,这可能是由于在密集级配混合料中使用了再生沥青路面(RAP)材料,并且其沥青粘合剂含量较低。在抗湿性方面,两种纳米材料(石墨烯纳米板和纳米粘土)都没有达到最低要求的抗拉强度比(TSR)标准(>0.80),表现不佳。此外,纳米材料在两种混合类型中显示出最低的TSR值,这表明它们对水分引起的损伤的有效性可能不如温混合添加剂。另一方面,与本研究评估的其他添加剂相比,热混合添加剂有望在抗湿性方面表现出增强的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信