Intravenous vitamin C against acute respiratory distress syndrome: A narrative review

IF 2.4 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Alberto Boretti
{"title":"Intravenous vitamin C against acute respiratory distress syndrome: A narrative review","authors":"Alberto Boretti","doi":"10.1016/j.phanu.2023.100365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>The use of intravenous vitamin C<span> (IV-Vit-C) in the context of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been a topic of interest and research. ARDS is a severe and life-threatening form of respiratory failure that can be triggered by various factors, including infections, trauma, and inflammatory conditions. Some studies and </span></span>clinical trials<span> have explored the potential benefits of high-dose intravenous vitamin C in the treatment<span> of ARDS, particularly in the context of severe respiratory illnesses such as those caused by viral infections.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two literature reviews are performed by using the google scholar data base (scholar.google.com), one searching for “CITRIS-ALI”, and the other searching for “COVID-19 Vitamin C”, without any time restrictions, and selecting specific works, and citing or cited works, deemed appropriate. All the works included in the c19early.org data base are then indirectly considered through their statistical summary of improvements.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Most of the studies support the use of IV-Vit-C against ARDS in general, including the COVID-19 induced ARDS. From the statistical analysis of 66 COVID-19 Vit-C studies, both IV and oral, there is a 18 % improvement in prophylaxis (RR 0.82 CI 0.69–0.97), a 37 % improvement in early treatment (RR 0.63, CI 0.41–0.98), and 21 % improvement in late treatment (RR 0.79, CI 0.70–0.88). Specific to this latter result are 39 studies of the 66.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>While IV-Vit-C was not a cure for COVID-19, it was a pragmatic but effectual means to reduce the COVID-19 mortality in cases of late infections and ARDS. IV and oral Vit-C may be considered one of the tools treating general ARDS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20049,"journal":{"name":"PharmaNutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PharmaNutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213434423000373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The use of intravenous vitamin C (IV-Vit-C) in the context of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been a topic of interest and research. ARDS is a severe and life-threatening form of respiratory failure that can be triggered by various factors, including infections, trauma, and inflammatory conditions. Some studies and clinical trials have explored the potential benefits of high-dose intravenous vitamin C in the treatment of ARDS, particularly in the context of severe respiratory illnesses such as those caused by viral infections.

Methods

Two literature reviews are performed by using the google scholar data base (scholar.google.com), one searching for “CITRIS-ALI”, and the other searching for “COVID-19 Vitamin C”, without any time restrictions, and selecting specific works, and citing or cited works, deemed appropriate. All the works included in the c19early.org data base are then indirectly considered through their statistical summary of improvements.

Results

Most of the studies support the use of IV-Vit-C against ARDS in general, including the COVID-19 induced ARDS. From the statistical analysis of 66 COVID-19 Vit-C studies, both IV and oral, there is a 18 % improvement in prophylaxis (RR 0.82 CI 0.69–0.97), a 37 % improvement in early treatment (RR 0.63, CI 0.41–0.98), and 21 % improvement in late treatment (RR 0.79, CI 0.70–0.88). Specific to this latter result are 39 studies of the 66.

Conclusions

While IV-Vit-C was not a cure for COVID-19, it was a pragmatic but effectual means to reduce the COVID-19 mortality in cases of late infections and ARDS. IV and oral Vit-C may be considered one of the tools treating general ARDS.

静脉注射维生素 C 预防急性呼吸窘迫综合征:叙述性综述
静脉注射维生素C (iv - vitc)在急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)中的应用一直是人们关注和研究的话题。急性呼吸窘迫综合征是一种严重的危及生命的呼吸衰竭,可由多种因素引发,包括感染、创伤和炎症。一些研究和临床试验已经探索了高剂量静脉注射维生素C治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征的潜在益处,特别是在病毒感染引起的严重呼吸系统疾病的情况下。方法使用google scholar数据库(scholar.google.com)进行两篇文献综述,一篇检索“CITRIS-ALI”,另一篇检索“COVID-19维生素C”,不受时间限制,选择特定的文献,并在认为合适的情况下引用或被引文献。然后,c19early.org数据库中包含的所有作品都通过其改进的统计摘要间接考虑。结果大多数研究支持使用iv - vitc治疗ARDS,包括COVID-19诱导的ARDS。通过对66项COVID-19 vitc研究的统计分析,包括静脉注射和口服,预防改善18% (RR 0.82 CI 0.69-0.97),早期治疗改善37% (RR 0.63, CI 0.41-0.98),晚期治疗改善21% (RR 0.79, CI 0.70-0.88)。这66项研究中有39项与后一项结果相关。结论iv - vitc虽不能完全治愈COVID-19,但对于降低晚期感染和ARDS患者的COVID-19死亡率是一种实用而有效的手段。静脉和口服维生素c可被认为是治疗一般ARDS的工具之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PharmaNutrition
PharmaNutrition Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
33
审稿时长
12 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信