{"title":"Przeklęty pastorał i błogosławiony habit, czyli dlaczego Anzelm z Lukki nie chciał być biskupem","authors":"Łukasz Żak","doi":"10.36693/202302p.169-197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cursed crosier and blessed habit: why did Anselm of Lucca not want to be a bishop?\n\nVita Anselmi is a hagiographic piece that presents the life of Anselm, Bishop of Lucca and close collaborator of Pope Gregory VII. The Vita was written shortly after the bishop’s death, probably in 1087, and serves as an important source of information about the Gregorian party in Tuscany and Lombardy. The author is anonymous, but we know that he lived at the court of Matilda of Canossa and was very familiar with the mentality and ideas of the countess’ entourage. In one of the most significant passages of the text the author writes that in 1075 Anselm, tormented by having received investiture with the ring and crosier from the king, left the Bishopric of Lucca and retired to a monastery. Historians who have studied the Vita (C. Violante, E. Pásztor, K. Cushing, P. Golinelli) believe in the veracity of this account; in their opinion Anselm realised that he would be unworthily elevated to episcopal office after the Lateran Synod of 1075, at which he had promulgated a decree against lay investiture. The research of some German scholars (R. Schieffer, J. Englberger) and the analysis of other sources make us understand, however, not only that the Roman Synod had not prohibited investiture “de manu regis” but also that it was by Gregory’s will that Anselm received the episcopacy from Henry IV. The Bishop of Lucca, therefore, must have renounced his office for other reasons. The aim of the paper is to find the real reason for his abdication. To achieve this goal, it is necessary to answer to a more general question: why did some reforming bishops of the eleventh century want to renounce episcopacy? The answer can be found in the letters of Peter Damian, who also asked the pope to be allowed to abandon his episcopal see.","PeriodicalId":146426,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Historyczny","volume":"47 s163","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przegląd Historyczny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36693/202302p.169-197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cursed crosier and blessed habit: why did Anselm of Lucca not want to be a bishop?
Vita Anselmi is a hagiographic piece that presents the life of Anselm, Bishop of Lucca and close collaborator of Pope Gregory VII. The Vita was written shortly after the bishop’s death, probably in 1087, and serves as an important source of information about the Gregorian party in Tuscany and Lombardy. The author is anonymous, but we know that he lived at the court of Matilda of Canossa and was very familiar with the mentality and ideas of the countess’ entourage. In one of the most significant passages of the text the author writes that in 1075 Anselm, tormented by having received investiture with the ring and crosier from the king, left the Bishopric of Lucca and retired to a monastery. Historians who have studied the Vita (C. Violante, E. Pásztor, K. Cushing, P. Golinelli) believe in the veracity of this account; in their opinion Anselm realised that he would be unworthily elevated to episcopal office after the Lateran Synod of 1075, at which he had promulgated a decree against lay investiture. The research of some German scholars (R. Schieffer, J. Englberger) and the analysis of other sources make us understand, however, not only that the Roman Synod had not prohibited investiture “de manu regis” but also that it was by Gregory’s will that Anselm received the episcopacy from Henry IV. The Bishop of Lucca, therefore, must have renounced his office for other reasons. The aim of the paper is to find the real reason for his abdication. To achieve this goal, it is necessary to answer to a more general question: why did some reforming bishops of the eleventh century want to renounce episcopacy? The answer can be found in the letters of Peter Damian, who also asked the pope to be allowed to abandon his episcopal see.
受诅咒的十字架和受祝福的习惯:为什么卢卡的安瑟伦不想当主教?《维塔·安塞尔米》是一部圣徒传记,讲述了卢卡主教、教皇格里高利七世的亲密合作者安塞尔米的一生。维塔是在主教死后不久写的,大概是在1087年,是关于托斯卡纳和伦巴第的格里高利派的重要信息来源。作者是匿名的,但我们知道他住在卡诺萨的玛蒂尔达的宫廷里,非常熟悉伯爵夫人随行人员的心态和想法。在文本中最重要的一段中,作者写道,1075年,Anselm因接受国王授予的戒指和十字架的任命而备受折磨,离开了卢卡主教区,隐居到修道院。研究过《维塔》的历史学家(C. Violante, E. Pásztor, K. Cushing, P. Golinelli)相信这一记载的真实性;在他们看来,安瑟伦意识到,在1075年拉特兰主教会议之后,他将不配升任主教职务,在那次会议上,他颁布了一项反对俗人授职的法令。一些德国学者(R. Schieffer, J. Englberger)的研究和其他来源的分析使我们明白,然而,罗马主教会议不仅没有禁止授予“de manu regis”,而且是由格里高利的遗嘱,安塞尔姆接受了亨利四世的主教职务。因此,卢卡主教必须放弃他的办公室,因为其他原因。这篇文章的目的是找出他退位的真正原因。为了达到这个目标,有必要回答一个更普遍的问题:为什么十一世纪的一些改革主教想要放弃主教职位?答案可以在彼得·达米安的信件中找到,他也要求允许教皇放弃他的主教职位。