Król, wójt, mieszczanie. Rywalizacja o władzę w małopolskich miastach królewskich w dobie jagiellońskiej

M. Mikuła
{"title":"Król, wójt, mieszczanie. Rywalizacja o władzę w małopolskich miastach królewskich w dobie jagiellońskiej","authors":"M. Mikuła","doi":"10.36693/202302p.245-265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The king, the vogt, the burghers. Fight for power in the royal towns of Małopolska in the Jagiellonian era\n\nThe hereditary vogtei was a natural consequence of foundation under German law. In most cases it was assumed by the locator and was associated with powers of a lord, including judicial powers. A hereditary vogt was essentially to be the representative of the town’s owner — thus, in the case of royal towns, the monarch (the vogt as a brachium regale). However, already by the end of Casimir the Great’s reign we can observe a move away from the idea of hereditary vogtei. Probably one of the reasons for this was the reduction in the effectiveness of the hereditary vogt’s actions due to the division of the vogtei through inheritance. However, during the reign of Władysław Jagiełło the hereditary vogtei was used for personal politics — as another type of property which could be used to reward someone’s services. There is a noticeable trend of accumulating property in the hands of noble families. Thus, an authority that undermined urban autonomy was being consolidated in the landscape of the urban system. The term denotes the extent of the burghers’ independence from outside entities in the management of the town, including with regard to the election of councillors. The following correlations have been noted between the extent of autonomy and the nature of hereditary vogtei: rich vogtei in the hands of a nobleman effectively limited the autonomy of a town included in the so-called II or III tax category (Biecz, Bochnia, Myślenice and Pilzno); poor vogtei, even one held by a starosta/ tenutary, was an insufficient basis for effectively limiting urban autonomy (Będzin, Ciężkowice, Częstochowa); the absence of vogtei (Proszowice) or vogtei bought out by the town (Połaniec, Sandomierz, Wieliczka) are circumstances that generally strengthen urban autonomy; the lack of vogtei (Chęciny) or vogtei bought out by a town (Nowy Sącz) may not have translated into significant autonomy, if the castle starosta successfully opposed it and the economic potential of the vogtei was small.","PeriodicalId":146426,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Historyczny","volume":" 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przegląd Historyczny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36693/202302p.245-265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The king, the vogt, the burghers. Fight for power in the royal towns of Małopolska in the Jagiellonian era The hereditary vogtei was a natural consequence of foundation under German law. In most cases it was assumed by the locator and was associated with powers of a lord, including judicial powers. A hereditary vogt was essentially to be the representative of the town’s owner — thus, in the case of royal towns, the monarch (the vogt as a brachium regale). However, already by the end of Casimir the Great’s reign we can observe a move away from the idea of hereditary vogtei. Probably one of the reasons for this was the reduction in the effectiveness of the hereditary vogt’s actions due to the division of the vogtei through inheritance. However, during the reign of Władysław Jagiełło the hereditary vogtei was used for personal politics — as another type of property which could be used to reward someone’s services. There is a noticeable trend of accumulating property in the hands of noble families. Thus, an authority that undermined urban autonomy was being consolidated in the landscape of the urban system. The term denotes the extent of the burghers’ independence from outside entities in the management of the town, including with regard to the election of councillors. The following correlations have been noted between the extent of autonomy and the nature of hereditary vogtei: rich vogtei in the hands of a nobleman effectively limited the autonomy of a town included in the so-called II or III tax category (Biecz, Bochnia, Myślenice and Pilzno); poor vogtei, even one held by a starosta/ tenutary, was an insufficient basis for effectively limiting urban autonomy (Będzin, Ciężkowice, Częstochowa); the absence of vogtei (Proszowice) or vogtei bought out by the town (Połaniec, Sandomierz, Wieliczka) are circumstances that generally strengthen urban autonomy; the lack of vogtei (Chęciny) or vogtei bought out by a town (Nowy Sącz) may not have translated into significant autonomy, if the castle starosta successfully opposed it and the economic potential of the vogtei was small.
国王、市议员、居民。雅盖隆时代马洛波尔斯卡王室城镇的权力争斗
国王,沃特人,市民。雅盖隆王朝时期Małopolska皇室城镇的权力之争世袭的vogtei是在德国法律下建立的自然结果。在大多数情况下,它由定位者承担,并与领主的权力有关,包括司法权。世袭的沃格特本质上是城镇所有者的代表——因此,在皇家城镇的情况下,沃格特是君主(沃格特作为brachium regale)。然而,在卡西米尔大帝统治的末期,我们已经可以观察到一种远离世袭思想的运动。其中一个原因可能是世袭的沃格特行动的有效性降低了,因为沃格特通过继承进行了划分。然而,在Władysław Jagiełło统治期间,世袭的vogtei被用于个人政治——作为另一种财产,可以用来奖励某人的服务。有一种明显的趋势是,财产在贵族家庭手中不断积累。因此,一种破坏城市自治的权力正在城市系统的景观中得到巩固。这个词指的是市民在城镇管理方面独立于外部实体的程度,包括议员的选举。自治权的程度与世袭的vogtei的性质之间存在以下相关性:贵族手中的丰富的vogtei有效地限制了所谓的II或III税收类别中的城镇的自治权(Biecz, Bochnia, Myślenice和Pilzno);贫穷的vogtei,即使是由starosta/ tentary持有,也不足以有效限制城市自治(Będzin, Ciężkowice, Częstochowa);没有vogtei (prozowice)或vogtei被城镇买断(Połaniec, Sandomierz, Wieliczka)是通常加强城市自治的情况;如果城堡starosta成功地反对了vogtei,并且vogtei的经济潜力很小,那么缺乏vogtei (Chęciny)或vogtei被一个城镇买断(Nowy Sącz)可能不会转化为显著的自治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信