Simulating auditory nerve fiber response following micro-electrode stimulation

Q4 Engineering
Cornelia Wenger, Andreas Fellner, Fred Bucek, Paul Werginz, Frank Rattay
{"title":"Simulating auditory nerve fiber response following micro-electrode stimulation","authors":"Cornelia Wenger, Andreas Fellner, Fred Bucek, Paul Werginz, Frank Rattay","doi":"10.1515/cdbme-2023-1202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The cochlear implant was the first effective and is still the most common neuroprosthetic device which is employed for people with severe to profound hearing loss. To restore auditory perception, an array of micro-electrodes that deliver electrical pulses to the auditory nerve is surgically implanted into the lower cochlea duct, the scala tympani (ST). However, implantation into the upper cavity, the scala vestibuli (SV) has been tested due to severe anatomical obstruction or ossification of the ST. Clinical results revealed similar performance and thresholds for SV and ST cochlear implant users. We present a simulation study of auditory nerve fibre response to monophasic stimulation of both polarities. Excitation profiles are compared for microelectrodes placed in the SV and equivalent positions in the ST. In total, 7 different electrode positions for 4 different fibres have been investigated in a homogenous 2D model. Results for the intact fibres predict generally higher anodic thresholds in comparison to cathodic stimulation at the same electrode position and mostly lower thresholds for the SV electrodes in comparison to their ST counterparts. In contrast, anodic thresholds are mostly lower than cathodic thresholds for the degenerated fibres. Furthermore, due to the increased electrode-fibre distance for degenerate fibres which have completely lost the dendrite, SV stimulation is less beneficial. However, for basal fibres and the clinically relevant mid scala placement of the electrode the typically high thresholds remain similar for ST and SV positions.","PeriodicalId":10739,"journal":{"name":"Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering","volume":" 4","pages":"5 - 8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2023-1202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The cochlear implant was the first effective and is still the most common neuroprosthetic device which is employed for people with severe to profound hearing loss. To restore auditory perception, an array of micro-electrodes that deliver electrical pulses to the auditory nerve is surgically implanted into the lower cochlea duct, the scala tympani (ST). However, implantation into the upper cavity, the scala vestibuli (SV) has been tested due to severe anatomical obstruction or ossification of the ST. Clinical results revealed similar performance and thresholds for SV and ST cochlear implant users. We present a simulation study of auditory nerve fibre response to monophasic stimulation of both polarities. Excitation profiles are compared for microelectrodes placed in the SV and equivalent positions in the ST. In total, 7 different electrode positions for 4 different fibres have been investigated in a homogenous 2D model. Results for the intact fibres predict generally higher anodic thresholds in comparison to cathodic stimulation at the same electrode position and mostly lower thresholds for the SV electrodes in comparison to their ST counterparts. In contrast, anodic thresholds are mostly lower than cathodic thresholds for the degenerated fibres. Furthermore, due to the increased electrode-fibre distance for degenerate fibres which have completely lost the dendrite, SV stimulation is less beneficial. However, for basal fibres and the clinically relevant mid scala placement of the electrode the typically high thresholds remain similar for ST and SV positions.
模拟微电极刺激后的听觉神经纤维反应
人工耳蜗是第一种有效的神经修复装置,目前仍是最常用的神经修复装置,用于重度至重度听力损失患者。为了恢复听觉,将一组微电极通过手术植入下耳蜗管,即鼓室(ST),向听神经传递电脉冲。然而,将前庭阶梯(SV)植入上腔时,由于其严重的解剖阻塞或骨化,前庭阶梯(SV)已经受到了测试。临床结果显示,SV和ST人工耳蜗使用者的性能和阈值相似。我们提出了听觉神经纤维反应的模拟研究单相刺激的两个极性。对放置在SV和st中等效位置的微电极的激发曲线进行了比较。在均匀的二维模型中,总共研究了4种不同纤维的7种不同电极位置。完整纤维的结果表明,在相同电极位置,与阴极刺激相比,阳极刺激阈值普遍较高,而SV电极的阈值大多低于ST电极。相反,退化纤维的阳极阈值大多低于阴极阈值。此外,由于完全失去树突的退化纤维的电极-纤维距离增加,SV刺激的效果较差。然而,对于基底纤维和临床相关的中尺度电极放置,ST和SV位置的典型高阈值仍然相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
239
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信