Fast cardiac magnetic resonance protocol. Feasibility of accelerated compressed sensing cine sequences in clinical practice

R. Oca Pernas , N. Hormaza Aguirre , A. Capelastegui Alber , D. Zarranz Sarobe , S. Pérez Fernández , C. Delgado Sánchez-Gracián
{"title":"Fast cardiac magnetic resonance protocol. Feasibility of accelerated compressed sensing cine sequences in clinical practice","authors":"R. Oca Pernas ,&nbsp;N. Hormaza Aguirre ,&nbsp;A. Capelastegui Alber ,&nbsp;D. Zarranz Sarobe ,&nbsp;S. Pérez Fernández ,&nbsp;C. Delgado Sánchez-Gracián","doi":"10.1016/j.rxeng.2023.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To demonstrate the feasibility of cardiac magnetic resonance<span> (CMR) cine sequences with compressed-sensing (CS) acceleration in the assessment of ventricular anatomy, volume, and function; and to present a fast CRM protocol that improves scan efficiency.</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Prospective study of consecutive patients with indication for CMR who underwent CS short-axis (SA) cine imaging compared with conventional SA cine imaging. We analysed ejection fraction (EF), end-diastolic volume (EDV), stroke volume (SV), and myocardial thickness. Two blinded independent observers performed the reading. Inter- and intraobserver agreement was calculated for all the measurements. Image quality of conventional and CS cine sequences was also assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 50 patients were included, 22 women (44%) with a mean age of 57.3 ± 13.2 years. Mean left ventricular EF was 59.1% ± 10.4% with the reference steady-state free precession sequences, versus 58.7% ± 10.6% with CS; and right ventricular EF with conventional imaging was 59.3% ± 5.7%, versus 59.5% ± 6.1% with CS. Mean left ventricular EDV for conventional sequences and CS were 166.8 and 165.1 ml respectively; left ventricular SV was 94.5 versus 92.6 ml; right ventricular EDV was 159.3 versus 156.4 ml; and right ventricular SV was 93.6 versus 91.2 ml, respectively. Excellent intra and interobserver correlations were obtained for all parameters (Intraclass correlation coefficient between 0.932 and 0.99; CI: 95%). There were also no significant differences in ventricular thickness (12.9 ± 2.9 mm vs 12.7 ± 3.1 mm) (p &lt; .001). The mean time of CS SA was &lt;40 sec versus 6–8 min for the conventional SA. The mean duration of the complete study was 15 ± 3 min.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Cine CS sequences are feasible for assessing biventricular function, volume, and anatomy, enabling fast CMR protocols.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94185,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia","volume":"67 2","pages":"Pages 137-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173510723001490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To demonstrate the feasibility of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) cine sequences with compressed-sensing (CS) acceleration in the assessment of ventricular anatomy, volume, and function; and to present a fast CRM protocol that improves scan efficiency.

Methods

Prospective study of consecutive patients with indication for CMR who underwent CS short-axis (SA) cine imaging compared with conventional SA cine imaging. We analysed ejection fraction (EF), end-diastolic volume (EDV), stroke volume (SV), and myocardial thickness. Two blinded independent observers performed the reading. Inter- and intraobserver agreement was calculated for all the measurements. Image quality of conventional and CS cine sequences was also assessed.

Results

A total of 50 patients were included, 22 women (44%) with a mean age of 57.3 ± 13.2 years. Mean left ventricular EF was 59.1% ± 10.4% with the reference steady-state free precession sequences, versus 58.7% ± 10.6% with CS; and right ventricular EF with conventional imaging was 59.3% ± 5.7%, versus 59.5% ± 6.1% with CS. Mean left ventricular EDV for conventional sequences and CS were 166.8 and 165.1 ml respectively; left ventricular SV was 94.5 versus 92.6 ml; right ventricular EDV was 159.3 versus 156.4 ml; and right ventricular SV was 93.6 versus 91.2 ml, respectively. Excellent intra and interobserver correlations were obtained for all parameters (Intraclass correlation coefficient between 0.932 and 0.99; CI: 95%). There were also no significant differences in ventricular thickness (12.9 ± 2.9 mm vs 12.7 ± 3.1 mm) (p < .001). The mean time of CS SA was <40 sec versus 6–8 min for the conventional SA. The mean duration of the complete study was 15 ± 3 min.

Conclusions

Cine CS sequences are feasible for assessing biventricular function, volume, and anatomy, enabling fast CMR protocols.
快速心脏磁共振协议。加速压缩传感 cine 序列在临床实践中的可行性
目的探讨压缩感应(CS)加速心脏磁共振(CMR)序列在心室解剖、体积和功能评估中的可行性;并提出了一个快速的CRM协议,提高了扫描效率。方法前瞻性研究连续有CMR指征的患者行CS短轴(SA)影像与常规SA影像比较。我们分析了射血分数(EF)、舒张末期容积(EDV)、卒中容积(SV)和心肌厚度。两位盲法独立观察者进行了阅读。计算了所有测量结果的观察者之间和观察者内部的一致性。并对常规和CS序列的图像质量进行了评价。结果共纳入50例患者,女性22例(44%),平均年龄57.3 ± 13.2岁。参考稳态自由进动序列左室EF均值为59.1%±10.4%,CS组为58.7%±10.6%;常规影像右室EF为59.3%±5.7%,CS为59.5%±6.1%。常规序列和CS的平均左室EDV分别为166.8和165.1 ml;左室SV为94.5 vs 92.6 ml;右心室EDV分别为159.3 vs 156.4 ml;右心室SV分别为93.6 vs 91.2 ml。所有参数在观察者内和观察者间均具有良好的相关性(类内相关系数为0.932 ~ 0.99;置信区间:95%)。两组心室厚度也无显著差异(12.9 ± 2.9 mm vs 12.7 ± 3.1 mm) (p <; .001)。CS SA的平均时间为40 秒,而常规SA的平均时间为6-8 分钟。完成研究的平均持续时间为15 ± 3 min。结论sciine CS序列可用于评估双心室功能、容积和解剖结构,实现快速CMR方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信