Comprehensive and sensitive validation of the method and determination of measurement uncertainty for simultaneous specification of aflatoxin B1, B2, G1 and G2 in nuts

Hacer Sibel Karapinar , Numan Eczacioglu , Faruk Dogan
{"title":"Comprehensive and sensitive validation of the method and determination of measurement uncertainty for simultaneous specification of aflatoxin B1, B2, G1 and G2 in nuts","authors":"Hacer Sibel Karapinar ,&nbsp;Numan Eczacioglu ,&nbsp;Faruk Dogan","doi":"10.1016/j.meafoo.2023.100124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, a comprehensive and sensitive validation study of the legally used method was conducted to simultaneously determine the levels of aflatoxin B1, B2, G1, and G2 in nuts. The applied method has been extensively evaluated in terms of in-laboratory detection limit and quantification limit, linearity, selectivity, precision, recovery, accuracy, adequacy, and measurement uncertainty. Levels of aflatoxins were examined by a validated immunoaffinity column-high performance liquid chromatography-post column derivatization-fluorescence detection (IAC-HPLC-PCA-FLD) analytical method. Detection limits (LOD) for aflatoxin G2, G1, B2, and B1 were found to be 0.05 μg/kg, 0.13 μg/kg, 0.06 μg/kg, and 0.15 μg/kg, respectively. The regression coefficient (R<sup>2</sup>) was greater than 0.999 according to constructed calibration curves for all aflatoxin components. Thus, the curves exhibited satisfactory linearity within the analyzed range. The combined standard uncertainty values for precision (RSD%) studies were below 10%. It showed a robust and reliable sensitivity with &lt;10% RSD with the test procedure. Average recovery values were detected as 67-84% for hazelnut and 60-89% pistachio. All aflatoxin components in hazelnut paste, which is the proficiency test material, were determined within an appropriate |Z|-score range (≤ 2). The relative expanded uncertainty of measurement was 0.80 μg/kg for AFB1 and AFG1, 0.83 μg/kg for AFB2 and AFG2, and 0.78 μg/kg for total AFs. The results showed that the approved method for the investigation and monitoring of aflatoxins in hazelnuts and pistachios is highly sensitive, robust, reliable, selective, and reproducible. Validation parameters can be successfully used in routine analysis to monitor aflatoxins in nuts for compliance with current regulations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100898,"journal":{"name":"Measurement: Food","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772275923000485/pdfft?md5=f8bccefe81582fdbddcb06fd6b2b950e&pid=1-s2.0-S2772275923000485-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measurement: Food","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772275923000485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, a comprehensive and sensitive validation study of the legally used method was conducted to simultaneously determine the levels of aflatoxin B1, B2, G1, and G2 in nuts. The applied method has been extensively evaluated in terms of in-laboratory detection limit and quantification limit, linearity, selectivity, precision, recovery, accuracy, adequacy, and measurement uncertainty. Levels of aflatoxins were examined by a validated immunoaffinity column-high performance liquid chromatography-post column derivatization-fluorescence detection (IAC-HPLC-PCA-FLD) analytical method. Detection limits (LOD) for aflatoxin G2, G1, B2, and B1 were found to be 0.05 μg/kg, 0.13 μg/kg, 0.06 μg/kg, and 0.15 μg/kg, respectively. The regression coefficient (R2) was greater than 0.999 according to constructed calibration curves for all aflatoxin components. Thus, the curves exhibited satisfactory linearity within the analyzed range. The combined standard uncertainty values for precision (RSD%) studies were below 10%. It showed a robust and reliable sensitivity with <10% RSD with the test procedure. Average recovery values were detected as 67-84% for hazelnut and 60-89% pistachio. All aflatoxin components in hazelnut paste, which is the proficiency test material, were determined within an appropriate |Z|-score range (≤ 2). The relative expanded uncertainty of measurement was 0.80 μg/kg for AFB1 and AFG1, 0.83 μg/kg for AFB2 and AFG2, and 0.78 μg/kg for total AFs. The results showed that the approved method for the investigation and monitoring of aflatoxins in hazelnuts and pistachios is highly sensitive, robust, reliable, selective, and reproducible. Validation parameters can be successfully used in routine analysis to monitor aflatoxins in nuts for compliance with current regulations.

对同时测定坚果中黄曲霉毒素 B1、B2、G1 和 G2 的方法进行全面和灵敏的验证,并确定测量的不确定性
本研究对合法使用的方法进行了全面而灵敏的验证研究,以同时测定坚果中黄曲霉毒素 B1、B2、G1 和 G2 的含量。该方法在实验室检测限和定量限、线性、选择性、精密度、回收率、准确度、充分性和测量不确定性等方面进行了广泛的评估。采用经过验证的免疫亲和柱-高效液相色谱-柱后衍生-荧光检测(IAC-HPLC-PCA-FLD)分析方法检测了黄曲霉毒素的含量。黄曲霉毒素 G2、G1、B2 和 B1 的检出限(LOD)分别为 0.05 微克/千克、0.13 微克/千克、0.06 微克/千克和 0.15 微克/千克。根据构建的校准曲线,所有黄曲霉毒素成分的回归系数(R2)均大于 0.999。因此,在分析范围内,曲线的线性度令人满意。精密度研究的综合标准不确定度值(RSD%)低于 10%。该方法的灵敏度稳定可靠,测试程序的 RSD 为 10%。榛子和开心果的平均回收率分别为 67% 至 84%和 60% 至 89%。作为能力验证材料的榛子酱中的所有黄曲霉毒素成分都在适当的|Z|分数范围内(≤ 2)。AFB1 和 AFG1 的相对扩大不确定度为 0.80 μg/kg,AFB2 和 AFG2 的相对扩大不确定度为 0.83 μg/kg,总黄曲霉毒素的相对扩大不确定度为 0.78 μg/kg。结果表明,该方法灵敏度高、稳健可靠、选择性好、重现性好,可用于榛子和开心果中黄曲霉毒素的调查和监测。验证参数可成功用于常规分析,以监测坚果中的黄曲霉毒素是否符合现行法规。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信