{"title":"Development as Labour and Labour as Development: Korczak’s Philosophy of Labour Against the Background of Interwar Childhoods","authors":"Marta Rakoczy","doi":"10.14746/sho.2023.41.2.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this article, I consider two Korczakian conceptions complementary to each other of children’s labour as a means of building their agency and autonomy. The first is the concept of labour as development. While the second is development as labour. I analyse testimonies from Korczak’s institutions, including notes gleaned from children’s accounts Wspomnienia z maleńkości dzieci Naszego Domu w Pruszkowie [Recollections from the Children of Our Home in Pruszków], children’s texts (Mały Przegląd [Little Review]) and programme and literary texts by Janusz Korczak/Henryk Goldszmit and Maria (Maryna) Falska, who collaborated with him. In the anthropological perspective of new childhood studies I ponder the radicalism of Korczak’s projects involving child labour in light of the time, their perspective on child labour, and childhood itself. In what sense did they have modern origins? And in what sense did they transcend modernity – along with its concepts of childhood and child development?","PeriodicalId":32183,"journal":{"name":"Studia Historiae Oeconomicae","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Historiae Oeconomicae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/sho.2023.41.2.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract In this article, I consider two Korczakian conceptions complementary to each other of children’s labour as a means of building their agency and autonomy. The first is the concept of labour as development. While the second is development as labour. I analyse testimonies from Korczak’s institutions, including notes gleaned from children’s accounts Wspomnienia z maleńkości dzieci Naszego Domu w Pruszkowie [Recollections from the Children of Our Home in Pruszków], children’s texts (Mały Przegląd [Little Review]) and programme and literary texts by Janusz Korczak/Henryk Goldszmit and Maria (Maryna) Falska, who collaborated with him. In the anthropological perspective of new childhood studies I ponder the radicalism of Korczak’s projects involving child labour in light of the time, their perspective on child labour, and childhood itself. In what sense did they have modern origins? And in what sense did they transcend modernity – along with its concepts of childhood and child development?
在本文中,我考虑了科尔扎克关于儿童劳动的两个相互补充的概念,作为建立其能动性和自主性的手段。首先是劳动即发展的概念。第二种是作为劳动的发展。我分析了来自Korczak机构的证词,包括从儿童账户Wspomnienia z maleńkości dzieci Naszego Domu w Pruszkowie [Pruszków中我们家的孩子们的回忆]收集的笔记,儿童文本(Mały Przegląd [Little Review]),以及Janusz Korczak/Henryk Goldszmit和Maria (Maryna) Falska的节目和文学文本,他们与Korczak合作。从新的儿童研究的人类学角度来看,我思考了Korczak在涉及童工的项目中的激进主义,根据时间,他们对童工的看法,以及童年本身。在什么意义上它们有现代起源?他们在什么意义上超越了现代性——以及它的童年和儿童发展概念?