RHD molecular analysis—from discovery to next generation sequencing

Annals of blood Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.21037/aob-22-41
Tracey E. Madgett, Wajnat A. Tounsi, A. J. Halawani, N. Avent
{"title":"RHD molecular analysis—from discovery to next generation sequencing","authors":"Tracey E. Madgett, Wajnat A. Tounsi, A. J. Halawani, N. Avent","doi":"10.21037/aob-22-41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This review traces the evolution of RHD genotyping from the very early days of the discovery of Rh polypeptides in 1982, and the pioneering work of the late 1980s and early 1990s that made the whole approach of RH genotyping possible. This work is often overlooked in contemporary Rh literature with citations of reviews being used which often do not give the complete background story. We have attempted to rectify this here. This review focuses primarily on RHD genotyping, primarily because of space constraints not to include RHCE but also because RHD is of greater clinical significance. In Europe many countries offer routine non-invasive prenatal RHD screening to direct the use of prophylactic anti-D to mothers that require it-namely are carrying D-positive fetuses. The genotyping approach is empirical (and wisely so) and any potential variant identified in this process is treated as D-positive. In such cases although sometimes unnecessary administration of prophylactic anti-D may be given, it only reflects the situation that predated mass scale non-invasive testing, and many countries not offering RHD screening. The complexity of the RHD gene and the known plethora of D variants (partial, weak D-elute and multiple genetic mechanisms generating the D-negative phenotype) are explored but only inasmuch as the technology to detect them is discussed. By far the most powerful means of accurate RHD genotyping, so called gold standard testing is next-generation sequencing although our discussion is tempered by several caveats mainly involving the rapid bioinformatic determination of a D variant from its resultant sequence. We stress however that next generation sequencing (NGS) offers the substantial advantage over other conventional RHD genotyping strategies in that novel variants can be identified whereas other methods require that the variant has been previously described so as to direct sequence specific analysis.","PeriodicalId":72211,"journal":{"name":"Annals of blood","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of blood","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/aob-22-41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: This review traces the evolution of RHD genotyping from the very early days of the discovery of Rh polypeptides in 1982, and the pioneering work of the late 1980s and early 1990s that made the whole approach of RH genotyping possible. This work is often overlooked in contemporary Rh literature with citations of reviews being used which often do not give the complete background story. We have attempted to rectify this here. This review focuses primarily on RHD genotyping, primarily because of space constraints not to include RHCE but also because RHD is of greater clinical significance. In Europe many countries offer routine non-invasive prenatal RHD screening to direct the use of prophylactic anti-D to mothers that require it-namely are carrying D-positive fetuses. The genotyping approach is empirical (and wisely so) and any potential variant identified in this process is treated as D-positive. In such cases although sometimes unnecessary administration of prophylactic anti-D may be given, it only reflects the situation that predated mass scale non-invasive testing, and many countries not offering RHD screening. The complexity of the RHD gene and the known plethora of D variants (partial, weak D-elute and multiple genetic mechanisms generating the D-negative phenotype) are explored but only inasmuch as the technology to detect them is discussed. By far the most powerful means of accurate RHD genotyping, so called gold standard testing is next-generation sequencing although our discussion is tempered by several caveats mainly involving the rapid bioinformatic determination of a D variant from its resultant sequence. We stress however that next generation sequencing (NGS) offers the substantial advantage over other conventional RHD genotyping strategies in that novel variants can be identified whereas other methods require that the variant has been previously described so as to direct sequence specific analysis.
RHD 分子分析--从发现到新一代测序
本文回顾了Rh基因分型的发展历程,从1982年Rh多肽的发现到20世纪80年代末和90年代初的开创性工作,使Rh基因分型的整个方法成为可能。在当代Rh文献中,这项工作经常被忽视,引用的评论往往没有给出完整的背景故事。我们试图在这里纠正这一点。这篇综述主要集中在RHD基因分型上,主要是因为篇幅限制没有包括RHCE,也因为RHD具有更大的临床意义。在欧洲,许多国家提供常规的非侵入性产前RHD筛查,以指导需要预防性抗- d的母亲使用它,即携带d阳性胎儿的母亲。基因分型方法是经验性的(也是明智的),在此过程中发现的任何潜在变异都被视为d阳性。在这种情况下,虽然有时可能会给予不必要的预防性抗- d,但它只反映了大规模非侵入性检测之前的情况,而且许多国家不提供RHD筛查。探讨了RHD基因的复杂性和已知的过多的D变体(部分,弱D洗脱和产生D阴性表型的多种遗传机制),但仅限于讨论检测它们的技术。到目前为止,准确的RHD基因分型最强大的手段,即所谓的金标准测试是下一代测序,尽管我们的讨论受到几个注意事项的影响,主要涉及从结果序列中快速确定D变体的生物信息学。然而,我们强调,与其他传统的RHD基因分型策略相比,下一代测序(NGS)提供了实质性的优势,因为可以识别新的变异,而其他方法要求变异之前已经被描述过,以便指导序列特异性分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信