{"title":"Exploring the Performance Dimensions of Indian Shadow Banks Through the CAMELS Framework","authors":"Nandita Bhattacharjee, A. P. Pati","doi":"10.1177/22785337231201499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The role of shadow banks, otherwise known as nonbanking finance companies (NBFCs), in any financial system is well recognized. Since their failure has the potential spillover effect on other institutions creating vulnerability in the entire financial system, identifying key areas that require improvement will enable the firm to work at institutional level to prevent the same. Also this exercise provides crucial input to the regulator to initiate appropriate and timely policy interventions. In this article, the performance is explored by considering the relevant parameters of 100 systemically important nondeposit-taking NBFCs in India by using the CAMELS framework. As very few NBFCs are listed in the stock market, a comparative analysis is made to identify distinct characteristics of listed and nonlisted firms. From the analysis, antecedent profitability and management competencies emerged as main performance drivers across the firms. Further, the result shows that listed firms engaged in income diversification and disbursing credit by relying on internal sources able to reduce the risk and enhance their performance. But, in the case of nonlisted firms generating revenue only through their core financing activities is key to their financial health. At the firm level, emphasis on improving the competencies through capacity building that will help improve the quality of assets and revenue generation is suggested. Simultaneously, the regulator also needs to keep a strong vigil on the activities of nonlisted firms.","PeriodicalId":37330,"journal":{"name":"Business Perspectives and Research","volume":"45 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Perspectives and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22785337231201499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The role of shadow banks, otherwise known as nonbanking finance companies (NBFCs), in any financial system is well recognized. Since their failure has the potential spillover effect on other institutions creating vulnerability in the entire financial system, identifying key areas that require improvement will enable the firm to work at institutional level to prevent the same. Also this exercise provides crucial input to the regulator to initiate appropriate and timely policy interventions. In this article, the performance is explored by considering the relevant parameters of 100 systemically important nondeposit-taking NBFCs in India by using the CAMELS framework. As very few NBFCs are listed in the stock market, a comparative analysis is made to identify distinct characteristics of listed and nonlisted firms. From the analysis, antecedent profitability and management competencies emerged as main performance drivers across the firms. Further, the result shows that listed firms engaged in income diversification and disbursing credit by relying on internal sources able to reduce the risk and enhance their performance. But, in the case of nonlisted firms generating revenue only through their core financing activities is key to their financial health. At the firm level, emphasis on improving the competencies through capacity building that will help improve the quality of assets and revenue generation is suggested. Simultaneously, the regulator also needs to keep a strong vigil on the activities of nonlisted firms.
期刊介绍:
Business Perspectives and Research (BPR) aims to publish conceptual, empirical and applied research. The empirical research published in BPR focuses on testing, extending and building management theory. The goal is to expand and enhance the understanding of business and management through empirical investigation and theoretical analysis. BPR is also a platform for insightful and theoretically strong conceptual and review papers which would contribute to the body of knowledge. BPR seeks to advance the understanding of for-profit and not-for-profit organizations through empirical and conceptual work. It also publishes critical review of newly released books under Book Review section. The aim is to popularize and encourage discussion on ideas expressed in newly released books connected to management and allied disciplines. BPR also periodically publishes management cases grounded in theory, and communications in the form of research notes or comments from researchers and practitioners on published papers for critiquing and/or extending thinking on the area under consideration. The overarching aim of Business Perspectives and Research is to encourage original/innovative thinking through a scientific approach.