Real-Life Effectiveness and Tolerability of Brivaracetam in Focal to Bilateral and Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Elena Fonseca, Ariadna Gifreu, Javier Abril Jaramillo, Luis Redondo Vergé, Manuel Quintana, Sofía Lallana, Samuel López-Maza, Laura Abraira, Daniel Campos-Fernández, Estevo Santamarina, Juan Rodríguez Uranga, Manuel Toledo
{"title":"Real-Life Effectiveness and Tolerability of Brivaracetam in Focal to Bilateral and Primary Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures","authors":"Elena Fonseca,&nbsp;Ariadna Gifreu,&nbsp;Javier Abril Jaramillo,&nbsp;Luis Redondo Vergé,&nbsp;Manuel Quintana,&nbsp;Sofía Lallana,&nbsp;Samuel López-Maza,&nbsp;Laura Abraira,&nbsp;Daniel Campos-Fernández,&nbsp;Estevo Santamarina,&nbsp;Juan Rodríguez Uranga,&nbsp;Manuel Toledo","doi":"10.1155/2023/6636730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><i>Purpose</i>. Brivaracetam (BRV), an antiseizure medication indicated for focal-onset seizures, has shown efficacy in the treatment of focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS). We aimed to determine the effectiveness and safety of BRV in patients with FBTCS and generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS). <i>Methods</i>. We performed a multicenter, retrospective, longitudinal study in adult patients with epilepsy who experienced at least one FBTCS or GTCS before starting BRV (baseline visit). Data were collected from consecutive outpatient visits over a 4-year period. All patients had been followed for at least 3 months before the baseline visit and completed a minimum follow-up of 3 months after starting BRV. Response (≥50% reduction in FBTCS/GTCS frequency) and retention rates, as well as seizure freedom and presence of adverse events at 3, 6, and 12 months, were recorded as outcome measures. <i>Results</i>. 114 patients were included (mean age 36.3 ± 18.0 years, 52% male, 36.6% genetic generalized epilepsy); 94 had a 12-month follow-up period. At 12 months’ follow-up, the response rate was 83%, and 73.4% of patients were FBTCS/GTCS-free. Retention was 79% at 12 months. Adverse events occurred in 29.8% of patients, the most common being drowsiness (14.9%). No significant differences were found in response rates between FBTCS and GTCS. Drug resistance was independently associated with lower response and seizure freedom rates at follow-up. The absence of a titration period predicted seizure freedom and response at 3 months. <i>Conclusions</i>. BRV is an effective and well-tolerated treatment in patients with focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures and generalized tonic-clonic seizures.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":6939,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica","volume":"2023 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2023/6636730","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2023/6636730","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose. Brivaracetam (BRV), an antiseizure medication indicated for focal-onset seizures, has shown efficacy in the treatment of focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS). We aimed to determine the effectiveness and safety of BRV in patients with FBTCS and generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS). Methods. We performed a multicenter, retrospective, longitudinal study in adult patients with epilepsy who experienced at least one FBTCS or GTCS before starting BRV (baseline visit). Data were collected from consecutive outpatient visits over a 4-year period. All patients had been followed for at least 3 months before the baseline visit and completed a minimum follow-up of 3 months after starting BRV. Response (≥50% reduction in FBTCS/GTCS frequency) and retention rates, as well as seizure freedom and presence of adverse events at 3, 6, and 12 months, were recorded as outcome measures. Results. 114 patients were included (mean age 36.3 ± 18.0 years, 52% male, 36.6% genetic generalized epilepsy); 94 had a 12-month follow-up period. At 12 months’ follow-up, the response rate was 83%, and 73.4% of patients were FBTCS/GTCS-free. Retention was 79% at 12 months. Adverse events occurred in 29.8% of patients, the most common being drowsiness (14.9%). No significant differences were found in response rates between FBTCS and GTCS. Drug resistance was independently associated with lower response and seizure freedom rates at follow-up. The absence of a titration period predicted seizure freedom and response at 3 months. Conclusions. BRV is an effective and well-tolerated treatment in patients with focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures and generalized tonic-clonic seizures.

Abstract Image

Brivaracetam 对局灶至双侧和原发性全身强直-阵挛发作的实际疗效和耐受性
目的。布伐西坦(BRV)是一种用于局灶性癫痫发作的抗癫痫药物,已显示出治疗局灶至双侧强直-阵挛性癫痫发作(FBTCS)的有效性。我们的目的是确定BRV在FBTCS和全身性强直-阵挛性癫痫(GTCS)患者中的有效性和安全性。方法。我们进行了一项多中心、回顾性、纵向研究,研究对象是在开始BRV(基线就诊)之前至少经历过一次FBTCS或GTCS的成年癫痫患者。数据收集自4年期间的连续门诊就诊。所有患者在基线访问前至少随访3个月,并在开始BRV治疗后完成至少3个月的随访。反应(FBTCS/GTCS频率降低≥50%)和保持率,以及3、6和12个月的癫痫发作自由度和不良事件的存在,被记录为结果指标。结果:114例患者(平均年龄36.3±18.0岁,男性52%,遗传性全身性癫痫36.6%);其中94人随访12个月。随访12个月,有效率为83%,73.4%的患者无FBTCS/ gtcs。12个月时的留存率为79%。29.8%的患者发生不良事件,最常见的是嗜睡(14.9%)。FBTCS和GTCS的有效率无显著差异。在随访中,耐药性与较低的反应率和癫痫发作自由率独立相关。没有滴定期预示3个月时癫痫发作自由和反应。结论。BRV对于局灶性至双侧强直阵挛性发作和全身性强直阵挛性发作患者是一种有效且耐受性良好的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
161
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Neurologica Scandinavica aims to publish manuscripts of a high scientific quality representing original clinical, diagnostic or experimental work in neuroscience. The journal''s scope is to act as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science or practice of this subject area. Papers in English will be welcomed, especially those which bring new knowledge and observations from the application of therapies or techniques in the combating of a broad spectrum of neurological disease and neurodegenerative disorders. Relevant articles on the basic neurosciences will be published where they extend present understanding of such disorders. Priority will be given to review of topical subjects. Papers requiring rapid publication because of their significance and timeliness will be included as ''Clinical commentaries'' not exceeding two printed pages, as will ''Clinical commentaries'' of sufficient general interest. Debate within the speciality is encouraged in the form of ''Letters to the editor''. All submitted manuscripts falling within the overall scope of the journal will be assessed by suitably qualified referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信