Joachim Starup-Hansen, Simon Williams, Alexandra Valetopoulou, Danyal Z. Khan, H. Layard Horsfall, Jigishaa Moudgil-Joshi, Oliver Burton, Hala Kanona, Shakeel Saeed, William Muirhead, Hani J. Marcus, Patrick Grover
{"title":"Skull base repair following resection of vestibular schwannoma: a systematic review (Part 1: The Retrosigmoid Approach)","authors":"Joachim Starup-Hansen, Simon Williams, Alexandra Valetopoulou, Danyal Z. Khan, H. Layard Horsfall, Jigishaa Moudgil-Joshi, Oliver Burton, Hala Kanona, Shakeel Saeed, William Muirhead, Hani J. Marcus, Patrick Grover","doi":"10.1055/a-2222-0184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Despite advances in skull-base reconstruction techniques, CSF leaks remain a common complication following retrosigmoid (RS) vestibular schwannoma (VS) surgery. We aimed to review and classify the available strategies used to prevent CSF leaks following RS VS surgery.\n\nMethods: A systematic review, including studies of adults undergoing RS VS surgery since 2000, was conducted. Repair protocols were synthesised into a narrative summary, and a taxonomic classification of techniques and materials was produced. Additionally, the advantages, disadvantages, and associated CSF leak rates of different repair protocols were described.\n\nResults: All 42 studies were case series, of which 34 were retrospective, and eight were prospective. Repair strategies included heterogeneous combinations of autografts, xenografts, and synthetic materials. A repair taxonomy was produced considering seven distinct stages to CSF leak prevention, including intraoperative approaches to the dura, internal auditory canal (IAC), air cells, RS bony defect, extra-cranial soft tissue, post-operative dressings, and CSF diversion. Notably, there was significant heterogeneity among institutions, particularly in the dural and IAC stages. The median postoperative incidence of CSF leaks was 6.3% (IQR 1.3%-8.44%).\n\nConclusions: The intra-operative strategies used to prevent CSF leaks during RS VS surgery vary significantly between and within institutions. As a result of this heterogeneity and inconsistent reporting of CSF leak predictive factors, a meaningful comparative analysis of repair protocols was not feasible. Instead, we propose the development of a prospective multi-centre service evaluation designed to accurately capture a comprehensive dataset of potential CSF risk factors, including all stages of the operative repair protocol.","PeriodicalId":16513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base","volume":"17 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2222-0184","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Despite advances in skull-base reconstruction techniques, CSF leaks remain a common complication following retrosigmoid (RS) vestibular schwannoma (VS) surgery. We aimed to review and classify the available strategies used to prevent CSF leaks following RS VS surgery.
Methods: A systematic review, including studies of adults undergoing RS VS surgery since 2000, was conducted. Repair protocols were synthesised into a narrative summary, and a taxonomic classification of techniques and materials was produced. Additionally, the advantages, disadvantages, and associated CSF leak rates of different repair protocols were described.
Results: All 42 studies were case series, of which 34 were retrospective, and eight were prospective. Repair strategies included heterogeneous combinations of autografts, xenografts, and synthetic materials. A repair taxonomy was produced considering seven distinct stages to CSF leak prevention, including intraoperative approaches to the dura, internal auditory canal (IAC), air cells, RS bony defect, extra-cranial soft tissue, post-operative dressings, and CSF diversion. Notably, there was significant heterogeneity among institutions, particularly in the dural and IAC stages. The median postoperative incidence of CSF leaks was 6.3% (IQR 1.3%-8.44%).
Conclusions: The intra-operative strategies used to prevent CSF leaks during RS VS surgery vary significantly between and within institutions. As a result of this heterogeneity and inconsistent reporting of CSF leak predictive factors, a meaningful comparative analysis of repair protocols was not feasible. Instead, we propose the development of a prospective multi-centre service evaluation designed to accurately capture a comprehensive dataset of potential CSF risk factors, including all stages of the operative repair protocol.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base (JNLS B) is a major publication from the world''s leading publisher in neurosurgery. JNLS B currently serves as the official organ of several national and international neurosurgery and skull base societies.
JNLS B is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles, and technical notes covering all aspects of neurological surgery. The focus of JNLS B includes microsurgery as well as the latest minimally invasive techniques, such as stereotactic-guided surgery, endoscopy, and endovascular procedures. JNLS B is devoted to the techniques and procedures of skull base surgery.