Accessibility difference in education-related websites from developing and developed countries

Utkarsha Singh, Jeevithashree Divya Venkatesh, Pradipta Biswas
{"title":"Accessibility difference in education-related websites from developing and developed countries","authors":"Utkarsha Singh, Jeevithashree Divya Venkatesh, Pradipta Biswas","doi":"10.52953/sbbu5539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, websites have become the key source of information for most people. There are several websites related to education, healthcare, government, e-commerce, and so on. These websites are used by a large population to access required information. Web content must meet the accessibility guidelines for websites to be accessible to all users, including people with different ranges of abilities across the globe. Thus, accessibility of the web is the prime facet of every website. This paper focuses on identifying accessibility differences in education boards or similar websites anchoring higher-level schools' leaving examinations. We have considered evaluating the accessibility of landing pages of 13 educational websites from a developing and developed group of countries. Six Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) tools from the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) were considered for evaluating each website. We have tabulated the results of each tool, highlighted the different accessibility issues for each website, and provided alternate suggestions that web developers can consider for resolve any issues. From the results we noted that the developing group of countries reported the maximum number of accessibility issues when compared to the developed group of countries. Selected webpages of developing and developed countries identified text contrast failures, and non-text contrast failures respectively. The education board websites of India and Japan were identified as having the maximum number of accessibility issues when compared to other selected websites.","PeriodicalId":274720,"journal":{"name":"ITU Journal on Future and Evolving Technologies","volume":"20 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ITU Journal on Future and Evolving Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52953/sbbu5539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, websites have become the key source of information for most people. There are several websites related to education, healthcare, government, e-commerce, and so on. These websites are used by a large population to access required information. Web content must meet the accessibility guidelines for websites to be accessible to all users, including people with different ranges of abilities across the globe. Thus, accessibility of the web is the prime facet of every website. This paper focuses on identifying accessibility differences in education boards or similar websites anchoring higher-level schools' leaving examinations. We have considered evaluating the accessibility of landing pages of 13 educational websites from a developing and developed group of countries. Six Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) tools from the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) were considered for evaluating each website. We have tabulated the results of each tool, highlighted the different accessibility issues for each website, and provided alternate suggestions that web developers can consider for resolve any issues. From the results we noted that the developing group of countries reported the maximum number of accessibility issues when compared to the developed group of countries. Selected webpages of developing and developed countries identified text contrast failures, and non-text contrast failures respectively. The education board websites of India and Japan were identified as having the maximum number of accessibility issues when compared to other selected websites.
发展中国家和发达国家教育相关网站无障碍程度的差异
近年来,网站已成为大多数人获取信息的主要来源。有几个网站与教育、医疗保健、政府、电子商务等相关。大量的人使用这些网站来获取所需的信息。Web内容必须满足网站的可访问性准则,以便所有用户都可以访问,包括全球不同能力范围的用户。因此,网络的可访问性是每个网站的主要方面。本文的重点是确定教育委员会或类似网站锚定高等学校毕业考试的可访问性差异。我们考虑评估来自发展中国家和发达国家的13个教育网站登陆页面的可访问性。来自万维网联盟(W3C)的六个Web内容可访问性指南(WCAG)工具被用于评估每个网站。我们将每个工具的结果制成表格,突出显示了每个网站的不同可访问性问题,并提供了可供web开发人员考虑的替代建议,以解决任何问题。从结果中我们注意到,与发达国家集团相比,发展中国家集团报告的无障碍问题最多。所选的发展中国家和发达国家的网页分别发现了文字对比失败和非文字对比失败。与其他选定的网站相比,印度和日本的教育委员会网站被认为存在最多的无障碍问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信