Postcolonial Theory and its application to the Post-Soviet States

Oksana Telenko, Oleksandra Kurbet
{"title":"Postcolonial Theory and its application to the Post-Soviet States","authors":"Oksana Telenko, Oleksandra Kurbet","doi":"10.15407/ingedu2023.56.255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to reveal the constraints of traditional postcolonial theory, particularly in its application in the post-Soviet space, and to argue the need to study the post-Soviet space through the prism of this theory, considering the colonial nature of the Soviet Union. It focuses on analysing the limitations of postcolonial theory concerning the so-called «Second World» and singling out distinctive attributes of the Russian imperial regime and its enduring aftermath. The authors had studied constraints within the postcolonial theory, in particular, the centrality of racist-related experience and narratives regarding «Second World». These limitations pave the way for a broader understanding of post-Soviet states' complex historical narratives. We analyse the expansionist ambitions of the Russian Empire (as well as its successor, the Soviet Union) both Eastward and Westward and its colonial practices imposed upon indigenous populations in newly acquired territories. This analysis showcases how Russian colonialism endured even after the collapse of the empire, finding a new life in Bolshevik ideology. In particular, the article provides data that testify USSR’s economic colonialism toward Ukraine. It is shown that due to autonomy development after Bolshevik revolution, Baltic states managed to implement robust institutional and economic reforms before the Soviet Union re-annexed their territories. In stark contrast, other territories, including Belarus, Ukraine, Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan, were swiftly absorbed by the Bolshevik regime following the demise of the imperial government. This dichotomy sheds light on the intricate process of decolonisation, demonstrating that true independence for some former Russian colonies only materialised after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The authors suggest that adopting a quasi-colonial lens to view the Soviet Regime provides profound insights into the challenges impeding the development of post-Soviet states. This paper offers a comprehensive understanding of the postcolonial dynamics in the post-Soviet states. It sheds light on not just the historical intricacies but also the contemporary challenges these nations face, thus contributing to a richer scholarly discourse on postcolonialism and its evolving relevance in the modern world.","PeriodicalId":244406,"journal":{"name":"Ìstorìâ narodnogo gospodarstva ta ekonomìčnoï dumki Ukraïni","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ìstorìâ narodnogo gospodarstva ta ekonomìčnoï dumki Ukraïni","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/ingedu2023.56.255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to reveal the constraints of traditional postcolonial theory, particularly in its application in the post-Soviet space, and to argue the need to study the post-Soviet space through the prism of this theory, considering the colonial nature of the Soviet Union. It focuses on analysing the limitations of postcolonial theory concerning the so-called «Second World» and singling out distinctive attributes of the Russian imperial regime and its enduring aftermath. The authors had studied constraints within the postcolonial theory, in particular, the centrality of racist-related experience and narratives regarding «Second World». These limitations pave the way for a broader understanding of post-Soviet states' complex historical narratives. We analyse the expansionist ambitions of the Russian Empire (as well as its successor, the Soviet Union) both Eastward and Westward and its colonial practices imposed upon indigenous populations in newly acquired territories. This analysis showcases how Russian colonialism endured even after the collapse of the empire, finding a new life in Bolshevik ideology. In particular, the article provides data that testify USSR’s economic colonialism toward Ukraine. It is shown that due to autonomy development after Bolshevik revolution, Baltic states managed to implement robust institutional and economic reforms before the Soviet Union re-annexed their territories. In stark contrast, other territories, including Belarus, Ukraine, Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan, were swiftly absorbed by the Bolshevik regime following the demise of the imperial government. This dichotomy sheds light on the intricate process of decolonisation, demonstrating that true independence for some former Russian colonies only materialised after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The authors suggest that adopting a quasi-colonial lens to view the Soviet Regime provides profound insights into the challenges impeding the development of post-Soviet states. This paper offers a comprehensive understanding of the postcolonial dynamics in the post-Soviet states. It sheds light on not just the historical intricacies but also the contemporary challenges these nations face, thus contributing to a richer scholarly discourse on postcolonialism and its evolving relevance in the modern world.
后殖民理论及其在后苏联国家的应用
本文旨在揭示传统后殖民理论的局限性,特别是其在后苏联空间中的应用,并认为有必要通过这一理论的棱镜来研究后苏联空间,考虑到苏联的殖民性质。它侧重于分析关于所谓“第二世界”的后殖民理论的局限性,并挑出俄罗斯帝国政权的独特属性及其持久的后果。作者研究了后殖民理论中的制约因素,特别是与种族主义有关的经验和关于“第二世界”的叙述的中心地位。这些限制为更广泛地理解后苏联国家复杂的历史叙述铺平了道路。我们分析了俄罗斯帝国(以及它的继承者苏联)向东和向西的扩张主义野心,以及它在新获得的领土上对土著居民施加的殖民做法。这一分析表明,即使在帝国崩溃后,俄罗斯殖民主义仍然存在,并在布尔什维克意识形态中找到了新的生命。文章特别提供了证明苏联对乌克兰的经济殖民主义的数据。研究表明,由于布尔什维克革命后的自治发展,波罗的海国家在苏联重新吞并其领土之前成功地实施了强有力的制度和经济改革。与此形成鲜明对比的是,其他领土,包括白俄罗斯、乌克兰、格鲁吉亚、亚美尼亚和阿塞拜疆,在帝国政府灭亡后迅速被布尔什维克政权吞并。这种二分法揭示了复杂的非殖民化过程,表明一些前俄罗斯殖民地的真正独立是在苏联解体后才实现的。作者认为,采用准殖民的视角来看待苏联政权,可以深刻地洞察阻碍后苏联国家发展的挑战。本文对后苏联国家的后殖民动态提供了一个全面的理解。它不仅揭示了历史的复杂性,也揭示了这些国家面临的当代挑战,从而有助于丰富后殖民主义及其在现代世界中不断发展的相关性的学术论述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信