Social representations of European history by the European youth: A cross-country comparison

IF 1.8 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
P. Bouchat, Rosa Cabecinhas, Laurent Licata, Maxence Charton, X. Chryssochoou, Sylvain Delouvée, H. Erb, Léo Facca, Christine Flassbeck, Valérie Haas, N. Kalampalikis, Renata Franc, Silvia Mari, Tomislav M. Pavlović, N. Petrović, M. Raudsepp, Alberto Sá, Inari Sakki, Maciek Sekerdej, Julien Taranczewski, N. Telle, J. Valentim, Aude Wenzel, Anna Wnuk, Denis J. Hilton
{"title":"Social representations of European history by the European youth: A cross-country comparison","authors":"P. Bouchat, Rosa Cabecinhas, Laurent Licata, Maxence Charton, X. Chryssochoou, Sylvain Delouvée, H. Erb, Léo Facca, Christine Flassbeck, Valérie Haas, N. Kalampalikis, Renata Franc, Silvia Mari, Tomislav M. Pavlović, N. Petrović, M. Raudsepp, Alberto Sá, Inari Sakki, Maciek Sekerdej, Julien Taranczewski, N. Telle, J. Valentim, Aude Wenzel, Anna Wnuk, Denis J. Hilton","doi":"10.5964/jspp.9805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present manuscript examines the way young Europeans represent Europe’s history. A study conducted in 11 European countries (N = 1406 students in social sciences) shows that the characters considered most important in the history of Europe are mostly men linked either to WW2, authoritarianism, or conquests and empires. Although these appear later in the rankings and despite some imbalance between countries, Europe’s history is also associated with religious figures, artists, scientists, and philosophers. These results show that the representations of the history of Europe currently shared by young Europeans correspond, in part, to historical narratives based on a specific set of experiences, events, and values supposedly common to the peoples of Europe that were promoted by European elites throughout the integration process. Further, these results suggest that beyond the negative narrative of war and the crimes of totalitarianism, the history of Europe is also embodied by positive characters transcending national boundaries and associated with a set of key elements of the EU identity: democracy, tolerance, solidarity, humanism, and the Enlightenment. Finally, we also highlight the near-total absence of characters unambiguously related to colonization and, especially, decolonization, and a strong overall under-representation of women.","PeriodicalId":16973,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social and Political Psychology","volume":"75 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social and Political Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.9805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present manuscript examines the way young Europeans represent Europe’s history. A study conducted in 11 European countries (N = 1406 students in social sciences) shows that the characters considered most important in the history of Europe are mostly men linked either to WW2, authoritarianism, or conquests and empires. Although these appear later in the rankings and despite some imbalance between countries, Europe’s history is also associated with religious figures, artists, scientists, and philosophers. These results show that the representations of the history of Europe currently shared by young Europeans correspond, in part, to historical narratives based on a specific set of experiences, events, and values supposedly common to the peoples of Europe that were promoted by European elites throughout the integration process. Further, these results suggest that beyond the negative narrative of war and the crimes of totalitarianism, the history of Europe is also embodied by positive characters transcending national boundaries and associated with a set of key elements of the EU identity: democracy, tolerance, solidarity, humanism, and the Enlightenment. Finally, we also highlight the near-total absence of characters unambiguously related to colonization and, especially, decolonization, and a strong overall under-representation of women.
欧洲青年对欧洲历史的社会表述:跨国比较
这份手稿考察了年轻的欧洲人代表欧洲历史的方式。一项对11个欧洲国家(1406名社会科学专业的学生)进行的研究表明,欧洲历史上最重要的人物大多是与二战、威权主义或征服和帝国有关的男性。尽管这些在排名中排名靠后,而且国家之间也存在一些不平衡,但欧洲的历史也与宗教人物、艺术家、科学家和哲学家联系在一起。这些结果表明,目前欧洲年轻人所分享的欧洲历史表征,在一定程度上与基于一组特定的经历、事件和价值观的历史叙述相对应,这些经历、事件和价值观被认为是欧洲人民共同的,在整个一体化过程中被欧洲精英所推动。此外,这些结果表明,除了战争和极权主义罪行的负面叙述之外,欧洲历史还体现了超越国界的积极特征,并与欧盟身份的一系列关键要素有关:民主、宽容、团结、人道主义和启蒙运动。最后,我们还强调了几乎完全没有与殖民,特别是非殖民化明确相关的角色,以及女性的整体代表性不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Social and Political Psychology
Journal of Social and Political Psychology Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
43
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Social and Political Psychology (JSPP) is a peer-reviewed open-access journal (without author fees), published online. It publishes articles at the intersection of social and political psychology that substantially advance the understanding of social problems, their reduction, and the promotion of social justice. It also welcomes work that focuses on socio-political issues from related fields of psychology (e.g., peace psychology, community psychology, cultural psychology, environmental psychology, media psychology, economic psychology) and encourages submissions with interdisciplinary perspectives. JSPP is comprehensive and integrative in its approach. It publishes high-quality work from different epistemological, methodological, theoretical, and cultural perspectives and from different regions across the globe. It provides a forum for innovation, questioning of assumptions, and controversy and debate. JSPP aims to give creative impetuses for academic scholarship and for applications in education, policymaking, professional practice, and advocacy and social action. It intends to transcend the methodological and meta-theoretical divisions and paradigm clashes that characterize the field of social and political psychology, and to counterbalance the current overreliance on the hypothetico-deductive model of science, quantitative methodology, and individualistic explanations by also publishing work following alternative traditions (e.g., qualitative and mixed-methods research, participatory action research, critical psychology, social representations, narrative, and discursive approaches). Because it is published online, JSPP can avoid a bias against research that requires more space to be presented adequately.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信