A Comparison of Post-Stroke Seizure Rates in Patients Receiving IV Thrombolytic, Mechanical Thrombectomy, and Conventional Treatment Following Acute Ischemic Stroke

Aydan Topal, Z. Öztekin
{"title":"A Comparison of Post-Stroke Seizure Rates in Patients Receiving IV Thrombolytic, Mechanical Thrombectomy, and Conventional Treatment Following Acute Ischemic Stroke","authors":"Aydan Topal, Z. Öztekin","doi":"10.36472/msd.v10i12.1098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The incidence of epileptic seizures after a stroke falls within a range of 2.3-43%. Varying opinions exist in the literature concerning the association between thrombolytic therapy, endovascular interventions, and the development of epileptic seizures post-stroke.\nMaterial and Methods: Seizure rates were compared based on the treatment method (thrombolytic therapy, endovascular intervention, or conventional therapy) in patients experiencing acute ischemic stroke within a two-year period in the neurology and neurology intensive care unit. Patients were categorized into three groups: the first group received IV thrombolytic therapy, the second group underwent mechanical thrombectomy, and the third group received conventional therapy. The occurrence of epileptic seizures from hospitalization to discharge was compared.\nResults: IV thrombolytics were administered to 1.5% of patients, mechanical thrombectomy to 3.6%, and 94.9% received medical treatment. Epileptic seizures were observed in 0.9% of patients. No statistically significant relationship was found between the development of epileptic seizures and the treatment method for ischemic stroke. Furthermore, no statistically significant correlation was identified between the development of epileptic seizures and the modified Rankin score at discharge.\nConclusion: Our findings align with existing studies. In conclusion, this retrospective study aimed to assess how the treatment method applied in acute ischemic stroke might influence the background of epileptic seizures.","PeriodicalId":18486,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science and Discovery","volume":"28 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science and Discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36472/msd.v10i12.1098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The incidence of epileptic seizures after a stroke falls within a range of 2.3-43%. Varying opinions exist in the literature concerning the association between thrombolytic therapy, endovascular interventions, and the development of epileptic seizures post-stroke. Material and Methods: Seizure rates were compared based on the treatment method (thrombolytic therapy, endovascular intervention, or conventional therapy) in patients experiencing acute ischemic stroke within a two-year period in the neurology and neurology intensive care unit. Patients were categorized into three groups: the first group received IV thrombolytic therapy, the second group underwent mechanical thrombectomy, and the third group received conventional therapy. The occurrence of epileptic seizures from hospitalization to discharge was compared. Results: IV thrombolytics were administered to 1.5% of patients, mechanical thrombectomy to 3.6%, and 94.9% received medical treatment. Epileptic seizures were observed in 0.9% of patients. No statistically significant relationship was found between the development of epileptic seizures and the treatment method for ischemic stroke. Furthermore, no statistically significant correlation was identified between the development of epileptic seizures and the modified Rankin score at discharge. Conclusion: Our findings align with existing studies. In conclusion, this retrospective study aimed to assess how the treatment method applied in acute ischemic stroke might influence the background of epileptic seizures.
接受静脉溶栓、机械取栓和常规治疗的急性缺血性脑卒中患者卒中后癫痫发作率的比较
目的:脑卒中后癫痫发作的发生率在2.3-43%之间。关于溶栓治疗、血管内干预和中风后癫痫发作之间的关系,文献中存在不同的观点。材料和方法:比较神经内科和神经内科重症监护病房两年内急性缺血性脑卒中患者癫痫发作率的不同治疗方法(溶栓治疗、血管内介入治疗或常规治疗)。将患者分为三组,第一组采用静脉溶栓治疗,第二组采用机械取栓,第三组采用常规治疗。比较两组患者住院至出院期间癫痫发作的发生率。结果:静脉溶栓率为1.5%,机械取栓率为3.6%,内科治疗率为94.9%。0.9%的患者出现癫痫发作。缺血性脑卒中的治疗方法与癫痫发作的发生无统计学意义。此外,癫痫发作的发生与出院时的修正Rankin评分之间没有统计学上的显著相关性。结论:我们的发现与现有研究一致。总之,本回顾性研究旨在评估急性缺血性脑卒中治疗方法对癫痫发作背景的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信