What Are the Barriers to Telerehabilitation in the Treatment of Musculoskeletal Diseases?

Q3 Medicine
Jose Bassan Franco, L. Maximino, L. L. B. Secchi, Bianca Caseiro Antonelli, W. Blasca
{"title":"What Are the Barriers to Telerehabilitation in the Treatment of Musculoskeletal Diseases?","authors":"Jose Bassan Franco, L. Maximino, L. L. B. Secchi, Bianca Caseiro Antonelli, W. Blasca","doi":"10.1159/000534762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Musculoskeletal-related chronic pain is one of the most disabling in the world, with knee osteoarthrosis (OA) being one of the main causes of functional limitation and chronic pain among people over 45 years of age. In view of this, the expansion of telehealth services, including telerehabilitation, allows less restricted access to health services, reducing expenses and saving time. Purpose: The aim of the study was to verify the barriers to the implementation of telerehabilitation in the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal diseases compared to face-to-face rehabilitation. Data Source: The data were obtained from PubMed, Scopus, the Virtual Health Library (VHL), Cochrane, and the Web of Science databases. Methods: This systematic review followed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to answer the PICOT question, “What are the barriers to implementing a telerehabilitation program for older people with knee osteoarthritis?”. The risk of bias was analyzed using the Review Manager program (RevMan). A search for articles was conducted and included only randomized clinical trials with older people with knee OA, selected by two blinded authors, according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, without publication time restriction, in the PROSPERO registry CRD42022316488. Results: The barriers to telerehabilitation have been overcome with the diversification of means of communication, the various possible ways of monitoring these patients from a distance, and the scheduling of face-to-face assessments and reassessments. The results presented in this review indicate that the barriers to implementing treatment protocols have been overcome, leading to clinical results which showed that there were no differences between the telerehabilitation and face-to-face groups for the clinical condition investigated. Conclusion: The barriers to telerehabilitation, which were more related to Internet access, telecommunication devices, personal relationships, and adequate monitoring of the exercise protocol, were overcome by diversifying the means of communication and delivering the exercise protocol for the implementation of telerehabilitation.","PeriodicalId":37244,"journal":{"name":"Portuguese Journal of Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Portuguese Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000534762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Musculoskeletal-related chronic pain is one of the most disabling in the world, with knee osteoarthrosis (OA) being one of the main causes of functional limitation and chronic pain among people over 45 years of age. In view of this, the expansion of telehealth services, including telerehabilitation, allows less restricted access to health services, reducing expenses and saving time. Purpose: The aim of the study was to verify the barriers to the implementation of telerehabilitation in the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal diseases compared to face-to-face rehabilitation. Data Source: The data were obtained from PubMed, Scopus, the Virtual Health Library (VHL), Cochrane, and the Web of Science databases. Methods: This systematic review followed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to answer the PICOT question, “What are the barriers to implementing a telerehabilitation program for older people with knee osteoarthritis?”. The risk of bias was analyzed using the Review Manager program (RevMan). A search for articles was conducted and included only randomized clinical trials with older people with knee OA, selected by two blinded authors, according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, without publication time restriction, in the PROSPERO registry CRD42022316488. Results: The barriers to telerehabilitation have been overcome with the diversification of means of communication, the various possible ways of monitoring these patients from a distance, and the scheduling of face-to-face assessments and reassessments. The results presented in this review indicate that the barriers to implementing treatment protocols have been overcome, leading to clinical results which showed that there were no differences between the telerehabilitation and face-to-face groups for the clinical condition investigated. Conclusion: The barriers to telerehabilitation, which were more related to Internet access, telecommunication devices, personal relationships, and adequate monitoring of the exercise protocol, were overcome by diversifying the means of communication and delivering the exercise protocol for the implementation of telerehabilitation.
远程康复治疗肌肉骨骼疾病有哪些障碍?
肌肉骨骼相关的慢性疼痛是世界上最致残的疼痛之一,膝关节骨关节病(OA)是45岁以上人群功能限制和慢性疼痛的主要原因之一。有鉴于此,扩大远程保健服务,包括远程康复,可以减少获得保健服务的限制,从而减少费用和节省时间。目的:本研究的目的是验证在慢性肌肉骨骼疾病治疗中实施远程康复的障碍与面对面康复的比较。数据来源:数据来自PubMed、Scopus、虚拟健康图书馆(VHL)、Cochrane和Web of Science数据库。方法:本系统评价遵循PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目)指南来回答PICOT问题,“对老年膝关节骨关节炎患者实施远程康复计划的障碍是什么?”使用Review Manager程序(RevMan)分析偏倚风险。对文献进行检索,仅纳入由两位盲法作者根据纳入和排除标准选择的老年膝关节OA患者的随机临床试验,无发表时间限制,在PROSPERO注册表CRD42022316488中。结果:通信手段的多样化、远程监测方式的多样化以及面对面评估和再评估的安排,克服了远程康复的障碍。本综述的结果表明,实施治疗方案的障碍已经被克服,导致临床结果表明,远程康复组和面对面组之间的临床状况没有差异。结论:远程康复的障碍主要与网络接入、通信设备、人际关系、运动方案的充分监控有关,通过多样化的通信手段和运动方案的传递,可以克服远程康复实施的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Portuguese Journal of Public Health
Portuguese Journal of Public Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
55 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信