Identifying ecological and evolutionary research targets and risks in climate change studies to break barriers to broad inference

Sarah J. Love, Joseph D. Edwards, Caitlin N. Barnes, Tyler W. d’Entremont, Ashlynn M. Hord, Alivia G. Nytko, Nadejda B. Sero, Shannon L. J. Bayliss, Stephanie N. Kivlin, Joseph K. Bailey
{"title":"Identifying ecological and evolutionary research targets and risks in climate change studies to break barriers to broad inference","authors":"Sarah J. Love, Joseph D. Edwards, Caitlin N. Barnes, Tyler W. d’Entremont, Ashlynn M. Hord, Alivia G. Nytko, Nadejda B. Sero, Shannon L. J. Bayliss, Stephanie N. Kivlin, Joseph K. Bailey","doi":"10.1371/journal.pclm.0000320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding the responses of plants, microbes, and their interactions to long-term climate change is essential to identifying the traits, genes, and functions of organisms that maintain ecosystem stability and function of the biosphere. However, many studies investigating organismal responses to climate change are limited in their scope along several key ecological, evolutionary, and environmental axes, creating barriers to broader inference. Broad inference, or the ability to apply and validate findings across these axes, is a vital component of achieving climate preparedness in the future. Breaking barriers to broad inference requires accurate cross-ecosystem interpretability and the identification of reliable frameworks for how these responses will manifest. Current approaches have generated a valuable, yet sometimes contradictory or context dependent, understanding of responses to climate change factors from the organismal- to ecosystem-level. In this synthesis, we use plants, soil microbial communities, and their interactions as examples to identify five major barriers to broad inference and resultant target research areas. We also explain risks associated with disregarding these barriers to broad inference and potential approaches to overcoming them. Developing and funding experimental frameworks that integrate basic ecological and evolutionary principles and are designed to capture broad inference across levels of organization is necessary to further our understanding of climate change on large scales.","PeriodicalId":74463,"journal":{"name":"PLOS climate","volume":"47 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS climate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the responses of plants, microbes, and their interactions to long-term climate change is essential to identifying the traits, genes, and functions of organisms that maintain ecosystem stability and function of the biosphere. However, many studies investigating organismal responses to climate change are limited in their scope along several key ecological, evolutionary, and environmental axes, creating barriers to broader inference. Broad inference, or the ability to apply and validate findings across these axes, is a vital component of achieving climate preparedness in the future. Breaking barriers to broad inference requires accurate cross-ecosystem interpretability and the identification of reliable frameworks for how these responses will manifest. Current approaches have generated a valuable, yet sometimes contradictory or context dependent, understanding of responses to climate change factors from the organismal- to ecosystem-level. In this synthesis, we use plants, soil microbial communities, and their interactions as examples to identify five major barriers to broad inference and resultant target research areas. We also explain risks associated with disregarding these barriers to broad inference and potential approaches to overcoming them. Developing and funding experimental frameworks that integrate basic ecological and evolutionary principles and are designed to capture broad inference across levels of organization is necessary to further our understanding of climate change on large scales.
确定气候变化研究中的生态和进化研究目标与风险,打破广泛推论的障碍
了解植物、微生物及其相互作用对长期气候变化的响应,对于识别维持生态系统稳定和生物圈功能的生物的特征、基因和功能至关重要。然而,许多调查生物对气候变化反应的研究在几个关键的生态、进化和环境轴上的范围受到限制,这为更广泛的推断创造了障碍。广泛的推断,或在这些轴上应用和验证发现的能力,是在未来实现气候准备的重要组成部分。打破广泛推断的障碍需要准确的跨生态系统可解释性,并确定这些反应将如何表现的可靠框架。目前的方法对从有机体到生态系统对气候变化因子的响应产生了有价值的理解,但有时是相互矛盾的或依赖于环境的。在这一综合中,我们以植物、土壤微生物群落及其相互作用为例,确定了广泛推断和最终目标研究领域的五大障碍。我们还解释了与忽视这些障碍进行广泛推断和克服它们的潜在方法相关的风险。开发和资助实验框架,整合基本的生态和进化原则,旨在捕捉跨组织层面的广泛推论,这对我们进一步了解大尺度的气候变化是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信