Comparison of the Effectiveness of Single-Loop and Double-Loop Debriefing Techniques

Chun-Ti Yu, Fei-Hsiu Hsiao
{"title":"Comparison of the Effectiveness of Single-Loop and Double-Loop Debriefing Techniques","authors":"Chun-Ti Yu, Fei-Hsiu Hsiao","doi":"10.3928/00220124-20231130-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n The goal of this study is to compare the quality between single-loop and double-loop debriefing techniques from the perspectives of new nurses, preceptors, and senior nurses. Single-loop debriefing techniques were used in traditional nursing education. In recent years, double-loop debriefing techniques have been used in nursing education.\n \n \n \n This study adopted a prospective observational design, and the sample included three groups, new nurses, preceptors, and senior nurses, each with 53 participants. The Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH) instrument was used to measure the quality of different debriefing techniques.\n \n \n \n The DASH scores for double-loop debriefing techniques were significantly higher than the scores for single-loop debriefing techniques among the three groups. The scores for new nurses were higher than those for the senior nurses and preceptors.\n \n \n \n \n The results indicated that double-loop debriefing techniques are more effective than single-loop debriefing techniques. Double-loop debriefing techniques can improve teaching satisfaction.\n \n [\n J Contin Educ Nurs.\n 202x;5x(x):xx–xx.]\n \n \n","PeriodicalId":119872,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing","volume":"53 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20231130-25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The goal of this study is to compare the quality between single-loop and double-loop debriefing techniques from the perspectives of new nurses, preceptors, and senior nurses. Single-loop debriefing techniques were used in traditional nursing education. In recent years, double-loop debriefing techniques have been used in nursing education. This study adopted a prospective observational design, and the sample included three groups, new nurses, preceptors, and senior nurses, each with 53 participants. The Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH) instrument was used to measure the quality of different debriefing techniques. The DASH scores for double-loop debriefing techniques were significantly higher than the scores for single-loop debriefing techniques among the three groups. The scores for new nurses were higher than those for the senior nurses and preceptors. The results indicated that double-loop debriefing techniques are more effective than single-loop debriefing techniques. Double-loop debriefing techniques can improve teaching satisfaction. [ J Contin Educ Nurs. 202x;5x(x):xx–xx.]
单环和双环汇报技术的效果比较
本研究的目的是从新护士、导师长和资深护士的角度比较单环和双环述职技巧的质量。传统护理教育采用单回路述职技术。近年来,双循环述职技术已被应用于护理教育中。本研究采用前瞻性观察设计,样本分为新护士、辅导员和老年护士三组,每组53人。使用医疗保健模拟述情评估(DASH)工具来衡量不同述情技术的质量。在三组中,双循环述职技术的DASH得分显著高于单循环述职技术的得分。新护士的得分高于老护士和辅导员。结果表明,双循环述职技术比单循环述职技术更有效。双循环述职可以提高教学满意度。[J] .中华再教育护理杂志,2009;5 (x): xx-xx。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信