Multibody Dynamics Modeling of a Continuous Rubber Track System. Part 2—Experimental Evaluation of Load Prediction

IF 0.6 Q4 TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Olivier Duhamel, Antoine Faivre, Jean-Sébastien Plante
{"title":"Multibody Dynamics Modeling of a Continuous Rubber Track System. Part\n 2—Experimental Evaluation of Load Prediction","authors":"Olivier Duhamel, Antoine Faivre, Jean-Sébastien Plante","doi":"10.4271/02-17-01-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vehicles equipped with rubber track systems feature a high level of performance\n but are challenging to design due to the complex components involved and the\n large number of degrees of freedom, thus raising the need to develop validated\n numerical simulation tools.\n\n \nIn this article, a multibody dynamics (MBD) model of a continuous rubber track\n system developed in Part 1 is compared with extensive experimental data to\n evaluate the model accuracy over a wide range of operating conditions (tractor\n speed and rear axle load). The experiment consists of crossing an instrumented\n bump-shaped obstacle with a tractor equipped with a pair of rubber track systems\n on the rear axle. Experimental responses are synchronized with simulation\n results using a cross-correlation approach.\n\n \nThe vertical and longitudinal maximum forces predicted by the model,\n respectively, show average relative errors of 34% and 39% compared to\n experimental data (1–16 km/h). In both cases, the average relative error is\n lower for tractor speed from 1 to 7 km/h, namely 20% and 35%. The model and\n experimental amplitudes spectra of the force signals are compared using the\n coefficient of determination r2. In the 1 to 7 km/h\n tractor speed range, the average vertical and longitudinal coefficients of\n determination are, respectively, 0.83 and 0.42. The coefficients, respectively,\n reduce to 0.27 and 0.14 for speeds over 7 km/h.\n\n \nIn summary, the model can predict the maximum vertical and longitudinal forces in\n addition to the amplitude spectrum of those signals for operating conditions up\n to 7 km/h, regardless of the rear axle load, with accuracy acceptable for many\n applications, such as load case determination for preliminary structural design.\n Several factors affecting the accuracy of the model at higher tractor speed are\n identified for future work including suspension creeping, suspension compression\n characterization at high strain rates, and temperature dependence of material\n properties.","PeriodicalId":45281,"journal":{"name":"SAE International Journal of Commercial Vehicles","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAE International Journal of Commercial Vehicles","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/02-17-01-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vehicles equipped with rubber track systems feature a high level of performance but are challenging to design due to the complex components involved and the large number of degrees of freedom, thus raising the need to develop validated numerical simulation tools. In this article, a multibody dynamics (MBD) model of a continuous rubber track system developed in Part 1 is compared with extensive experimental data to evaluate the model accuracy over a wide range of operating conditions (tractor speed and rear axle load). The experiment consists of crossing an instrumented bump-shaped obstacle with a tractor equipped with a pair of rubber track systems on the rear axle. Experimental responses are synchronized with simulation results using a cross-correlation approach. The vertical and longitudinal maximum forces predicted by the model, respectively, show average relative errors of 34% and 39% compared to experimental data (1–16 km/h). In both cases, the average relative error is lower for tractor speed from 1 to 7 km/h, namely 20% and 35%. The model and experimental amplitudes spectra of the force signals are compared using the coefficient of determination r2. In the 1 to 7 km/h tractor speed range, the average vertical and longitudinal coefficients of determination are, respectively, 0.83 and 0.42. The coefficients, respectively, reduce to 0.27 and 0.14 for speeds over 7 km/h. In summary, the model can predict the maximum vertical and longitudinal forces in addition to the amplitude spectrum of those signals for operating conditions up to 7 km/h, regardless of the rear axle load, with accuracy acceptable for many applications, such as load case determination for preliminary structural design. Several factors affecting the accuracy of the model at higher tractor speed are identified for future work including suspension creeping, suspension compression characterization at high strain rates, and temperature dependence of material properties.
连续橡胶履带系统的多体动力学建模。第 2 部分--载荷预测的实验评估
配备橡胶履带系统的车辆具有高水平的性能,但由于涉及复杂的部件和大量的自由度,因此设计具有挑战性,因此需要开发经过验证的数值模拟工具。在本文中,将第1部分中开发的连续橡胶履带系统的多体动力学(MBD)模型与大量实验数据进行比较,以评估模型在广泛操作条件(拖拉机速度和后轴载荷)下的准确性。实验包括驾驶一辆在后轴上装有一对橡胶履带系统的拖拉机穿越一个仪表化的凹凸状障碍物。实验响应采用互相关方法与仿真结果同步。模型预测的垂直和纵向最大力与实验数据(1 ~ 16 km/h)的平均相对误差分别为34%和39%。在这两种情况下,拖拉机速度为1 ~ 7 km/h时,平均相对误差较低,分别为20%和35%。利用决定系数r2对模型和实验的力信号振幅谱进行了比较。在1 ~ 7 km/h拖拉机速度范围内,平均纵向决定系数为0.83,纵向决定系数为0.42。速度超过7公里/小时时,系数分别降至0.27和0.14。总之,该模型可以预测最大的垂直和纵向力,以及这些信号的振幅谱,在高达7公里/小时的运行条件下,无论后轴载荷如何,精度都可以接受许多应用,例如初步结构设计的载荷情况确定。在未来的工作中,研究人员确定了影响模型在更高拖拉机速度下准确性的几个因素,包括悬架爬行、高应变速率下的悬架压缩特性,以及材料性能对温度的依赖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SAE International Journal of Commercial Vehicles
SAE International Journal of Commercial Vehicles TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信